100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
LSAT PRACTICE QUESTIONS Latest Update Actual Exam from Credible Sources with 110 Questions and Verified Correct Answers Golden Ticket to Guaranteed A+ Verified by Professor CA$29.17   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. LSAT PRACTICE
  4.  
  5. LSAT PRACTICE

Exam (elaborations)

LSAT PRACTICE QUESTIONS Latest Update Actual Exam from Credible Sources with 110 Questions and Verified Correct Answers Golden Ticket to Guaranteed A+ Verified by Professor
 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • LSAT PRACTICE
  • Institution
  • LSAT PRACTICE

LSAT PRACTICE QUESTIONS Latest Update Actual Exam from Credible Sources with 110 Questions and Verified Correct Answers Golden Ticket to Guaranteed A+ Verified by Professor

Preview 4 out of 58  pages

Document information

  • October 10, 2024
  • 58
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • lsat practice questions latest update ac

Written for

  • LSAT PRACTICE
  • LSAT PRACTICE

Seller

avatar-seller
Tutordiligent

Reviews received

Content preview

LSAT PRACTICE QUESTIONS Latest Update
2024-2025 Actual Exam from Credible Sources
with 110 Questions and Verified Correct Answers
Golden Ticket to Guaranteed A+ Verified by
Professor

LOGICAL REASONING:


DENIAL TEST




Naturalist: The recent claims that the Tasmanian tiger is not extinct are false. The
Tasmanian tiger's natural habitat was taken over by sheep farming decades ago,
resulting in the animal's systematic elimination from the area. Since then naturalists
working in the region have discovered no hard evidence of its survival, such as
carcasses or tracks. In spite of alleged sightings of the animal, the Tasmanian tiger no
longer exists.


Which one of the following is an assumption on which the naturalist's argument
depends?


A) Sheep farming drove the last Tasmanian tigers to starvation by chasing them from
their natural habitat.


B)Some scavengers in Tasmania are capable of destroying tiger carcasses without a
trace.


C)Every naturalist working in the Tasmanian tiger's natural habitat has looked
systematically for evidence of the tiger's survival.

,D)The Tasmanian tiger did not move and a - CORRECT ANSWER: D)The Tasmanian
tiger did not move and adapt to a different region in response to the loss of habitat.


LOGICAL REASONING:


DENIAL TEST


On a certain day, nine scheduled flights on Swift Airlines were canceled. Ordinarily, a
cancellation is due to mechanical problems with the airplane scheduled for a certain
flight. However, since it is unlikely that Swift would have the mechanical problems with
more than one or two scheduled flights on a single day, some of the nine cancellations
were probably due to something else.


The argument depends on which one of the following assumptions?


(A) More than one or two airplanes were scheduled for the nine canceled flights.
(B) Swift Airlines has fewer mechanical problems than do other airlines of the same
size.
(C) Each of the canceled flights would have been longer than the average flight on Swift
Airlines.
(D) Swift Airlines had never before canceled more than one or two scheduled flights on
a single day.
(E) All of the airplanes scheduled for the canceled flights are base - CORRECT
ANSWER: (A) More than one or two airplanes were scheduled for the nine canceled
flights.


LOGICAL REASONING:


IDENTIFYING CENTRAL ASSUMPTION

,All material bodies are divisible into parts, and everything divisible is imperfect. It follows
rgar akk material bodies are imperfect.It likewise follows that the spirit is not a material
body.


The final conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?


a) Everything divisible is a material body.
b) Nothing imperfect is indivisible.
c) The spirit is divisible.
d) The spirit is perfect.
e) The spirit is either indivisible or imperfect. - CORRECT ANSWER: d) The spirit is
perfect.


LOGICAL REASONING:


IDENTIFYING CENTRAL ASSUMPTION


No chordates are tracheophytes, and all members of Pteropsida are tracheophytes. So
no members of Pteropsida belong to the family Hominidae.


The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?


(a) All members of the family Hominidae are tracheophytes
(b) All members of the family Hominidae are chordates
(c) All tracheophytes are members of Pteropsida
(d) No members of the family Hominidae are chordates
(e) No chordates are members of Pteropsida - CORRECT ANSWER: (b) All members of
the family Hominidae are chordates


LOGICAL REASONING:

, IDENTIFYING CENTRAL ASSUMPTION


Obviously, we cannot in any real sense mistreat plants. Plants do not have nervous
systems, and having a nervous system is necessary to experience pain.
The conclusion above follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?


(A) Any organism that can experience pain can be mistreated.
(B) Only organisms that have nervous systems can experience pain.
(C) Any organism that has a nervous system can experience pain.
(D) Only organisms that can experience pain can be mistreated.
(E) Any organism that has a nervous system can be mistreated. - CORRECT ANSWER:
(D) Only organisms that can experience pain can be mistreated.


LOGICAL REASONING:


WRONG CHOICE ANSWERS


Art historian: Great works of art have often elicited outrage when first presented; in
Europe, Stravinsky's Rite of Spring prompted a riot, and Manet's Dejeuner sur l'herbe
elicited outrage and derision. So, since it is clear that art is often shocking, we should
not hesitate to use public funds for supporting works of art that many people find
shocking.


Which of the following is an assumption, that is required for the Art historian to draw his
conclusion properly?


1. Most art is shocking
2. Stravinsky and Manet received public funding for their art
3. Art used to be more shocking than it currently is
4. Public fund should support art

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Tutordiligent. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$29.17. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82956 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
CA$29.17
  • (0)
  Add to cart