100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary Annotated Bibliograpghy BUSI 429.docx BUSI-429 Annotated Bibliography Liberty University Healthcare Economics and Decision Making 1. German, R. (2013). Prospective healthcare decision-maki £6.13
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Maryland - University College
  4.  
  5. UMGC

Summary

Summary Annotated Bibliograpghy BUSI 429.docx BUSI-429 Annotated Bibliography Liberty University Healthcare Economics and Decision Making 1. German, R. (2013). Prospective healthcare decision-maki
 0 purchase
  • Module
  • UMGC
  • Institution
  • University Of Maryland - University College

Annotated Bibliograpghy BUSI BUSI-429 Annotated Bibliography Liberty University Healthcare Economics and Decision Making 1. German, R. (2013). Prospective healthcare decision-making by combined system dynamics, discrete-event and ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

Document information

  • May 17, 2021
  • 5
  • 2020/2021
  • Summary

Subjects

  • annotated bibliograpghy busi 429docx busi 429 annotated bibliography liberty university healthcare economics and decision making 1

Written for

  • University Of Maryland - University College
  • UMGC
All documents for this subject (241)

Seller

avatar-seller
helperatsof1

Reviews received

Content preview

BUSI-429

Annotated Bibliography



Liberty University




Healthcare Economics and Decision Making


1. German, R. (2013). Prospective healthcare decision-making by combined system
dynamics, discrete-event and agent-based simulation. Retrieved April 12, 2021,
from
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6721426

Prospective Health Technology Assessment allows early decision making for
innovative health care technologies. The main idea is to combine available domain
knowledge with advanced simulation techniques in order to predict the effects of
medical products and to find bottlenecks and weaknesses within the health system. In
our recent publications a hybrid simulation approach with System Dynamics and
Agent-Based Modeling has been presented. Hospital workflows have been modeled
by state charts within agent behavioral models and have to be instantiated each time an
agent is entering a hospital.



2. Brousselle, A., & Lessard, C. (2011, February 03). Economic evaluation to inform
health care decision-making: Promise, pitfalls and a proposal for an alternative path.
Retrieved April 11, 2021, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953611000505

We document the increasing gap between economic evaluation and health care
decision-making. As the field has expanded, methodologies have become increasingly
sophisticated. Deciphering health economic evaluations constitutes one of the barriers
to its use. New ways have to be found to bring economic evaluation closer to the reality
of decision-making. A combined approach of cost-consequence, budget impact and
marginal analysis could be explored.


3. Taranu, I. (2016). Data Mining in Healthcare: Decision making and precision.
Retrieved
April 11, 2021.

The trend of application of data mining in healthcare today is increased because the
health sector is rich with information and data mining has become a necessity.

, Healthcare organizations generate and collect large volumes of information to a daily
basis. Use of information technology enables automation of data mining and
knowledge that help bring some interesting patterns which means eliminating manual
tasks and easy data extraction directly from electronic records.


4. Thokala, P., Devlin, N., Marsh, K., Baltussen, R., Boysen, M., Kalo, Z., . . . Ijzerman,
M. (2016, January 08). Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision
making-an Introduction: Report 1 of the Ispor Mcda Emerging good practices Task
Force. Retrieved April 11, 2021, from
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301515051359

Health care decisions are complex and involve confronting trade-offs between
multiple, often conflicting, objectives. Using structured, explicit approaches to
decisions involving multiple criteria can improve the quality of decision making and
a set of techniques, known under the collective heading multiple criteria decision
analysis (MCDA), are useful for this purpose.


5. Jansen, J., Fleurence, R., Devine, B., Itzler, R., Barrett, A., Hawkins, N., . . .
Cappelleri, J. (2011, June 12). Interpreting indirect Treatment comparisons and
NETWORK meta- analysis for Health-Care decision Making: Report of the ISPOR
Task force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons good RESEARCH Practices: Part 1.
Retrieved April 11, 2021,
from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098301511014045

Evidence-based health-care decision making requires comparisons of all relevant
competing interventions. In the absence of randomized, controlled trials involving a
direct comparison of all treatments of interest, indirect treatment comparisons and
network meta-analysis provide useful evidence for judiciously selecting the best
choice(s) of treatment. Mixed treatment comparisons, a special case of network
meta- analysis, combine direct and indirect evidence for particular pairwise
comparisons, thereby synthesizing a greater share of the available evidence than a
traditional meta- analysis.


6. Howick, J., & Search for more articles by this author. (2011, December 01). Exposing
the Vanities-and a QUALIFIED Defense-of Mechanistic reasoning in health care
decision making. Retrieved April 11, 2021, from
https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/662561

Philosophers of science have insisted that evidence of underlying mechanisms is
required to support claims about the effects of medical interventions. Yet evidence
about mechanisms does not feature on dominant evidence-based medicine
“hierarchies.” After arguing that only inferences from mechanisms (“mechanistic
reasoning”)—not mechanisms themselves—count as evidence, I argue for a middle
ground. Mechanistic reasoning is not required to establish causation when we have
high-quality controlled studies; moreover, mechanistic reasoning is more problematic

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller helperatsof1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £6.13. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

68175 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling
£6.13
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added