Noel Coward: at the time that this play came out, was the most popular playwright in the
English-speaking world.
● Idea for the play came to him in a dream…?
● Play written in four days in Shanghai
● Comes to us from the glorious and luxurious world that the characters inhabit.
Described as being tenuous, brittle, and delightfully daring.
● Interesting question between dysfunctionality and compatibility.
● Doubling parallelism and exchange tightly structures ACT 1: two couples, two balconies,
two sets of people that will produce drama.
Sibyl is much more retrograde in terms of her views with sexuality – she wants to be pale and
meek and girly (as opposed to Amanda)
● Makes us think about these things on the register of fashion…
Judith Butler: gender is something that is enacted, but we should be wary of biological
essentialism.
● Amanda wants a straightforward guy (Victor) and Elyot wants an innocent girl (Sibyl) –
their non-normativeness pushes Amanda and Elyot together.
Marriage relationships and how they do/don’t accommodate gender deviance.
● Amanda is the one that gets the lines that speak most directly to that material – the actor
playing Amanda has to carry it a lot!
Intersection between public/private; escapism, temporary/permanent, etc.
● Thin boundaries separates you from your past marriage and past life.
● When Amanda and Elyot run away, they’re still married to the two people – but, it’s
somehow less outrageous because they used to be married.
Surface/Depth
Noel Coward: Plays consist of lots of “small talk” and things in-behind.
● How does the play use “small talk” to signal something more complicated?
● What do Amanda and Elyot talk about concerning flippancy? Sometimes flippancy can
disclose something else…
Worms popping out of the eye sockets as a direct reference and silent illusion to Barbell?
● Both engaging in a mutually informing fantasy that they don’t have mutually strong
feelings about things – facade? Disclosing or badly attempting to conceal something.
● Communicating in a kind of code?
● Ironic relationship between the intensity of the intimacy and the superficiality of the
actual relation?
● Depth represented by shallowness?
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller heathersham1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £6.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.