100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary of defence of intoxication - Criminal law £3.49   Add to cart

Summary

Summary of defence of intoxication - Criminal law

 8 views  0 purchase
  • Institution
  • OCR

A summary sheet including the defence of intoxication

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • June 7, 2023
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (145)
avatar-seller
scarlettbuckle
Mental capacity defence. It isn’t allowed as an absolute defence in all
circumstances. As a matter of public policy, there is a need to discourage
antisocial behaviour caused by drink/drugs. Technically not a defence, just to
argue D didn’t have the MR. Leading case of Majewski sets out the rules.
Draws a distinction on whether the intoxication was voluntary or involuntary.
Also matters whether D has committed a specific intent or basic intent crime.
Specific intent - only intention will do for MR. Basic intent - Recklessness is
enough for MR.
Involuntary intoxication:
D was spiked, under duress, prescriptions that have unexpected effects,
soporific or sedative drugs that have the opposite effect (Hardie). It will not
apply where D has underestimated the effect of the drugs they have taken
(Allen). Can be a defence to both specific intent and basic intent, provided D
has not formed MR. Kingston - intoxication was involuntary but D still
formed MR to abuse the boy, so had no defence. Hardie - D took wife’s valium
and set fire to the wardrobe, not voluntary as D was not reckless.
Voluntary intoxication:
No defence to basic intent crimes, becoming intoxicated is a reckless course of
action in itself (Majewski). It can be a defence to specific intent crimes but not
if D had formed the MR (Gallagher). If there is a fallback offence for the
specific intent offence that D is charged with, then intoxication will only
provide a partial defence (Lipman). Richardson and Irwin - if they hadn't
been drinking would they have realised the risk of injury? If not they may
have a defence and be found not guilty. (court of appeal suggested this as an
alternative approach, used to say if the outcome would have been different if
we take this approach).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller scarlettbuckle. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62491 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£3.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart