100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Summary Criminal Law - Theft, Fraud, Robbery, and Burglary (Notes & Exam Guidance) £4.99   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Law (ULaw)
  4.  
  5. Criminal Law

Summary

Summary Criminal Law - Theft, Fraud, Robbery, and Burglary (Notes & Exam Guidance)

2 reviews
 32 views  0 purchase

These notes cover most of the topics taught on the postgraduate conversion courses in the UK (the GDL and the PGDL). They can also cover many introductory papers taught on UK undergraduate Law degrees (LLBs). These notes include guidance on exam structure and technique where relevant. Compared t...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 12  pages

Document information

  • July 19, 2023
  • 12
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (29)

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: zarahsultan • 10 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: akatiesutton • 1 year ago

Seller

avatar-seller
lawnotes08

Reviews received

Content preview

Criminal Law - Theft, Fraud, Robbery, and Burglary

Theft - s.1 Theft Act 1968

N.B. all 5 elements below must be present at the same time

- MR (dishonesty and intention to permanently deprive) must occur when AR
(appropriation of property belonging to another) occurs - DPP v Ray

AR: appropriating property belonging to another
- Appropriating
- S.3(1) TA 1968 - ‘Any assumption by a person of the rights of an
owner...this includes, where he has come by the property (innocently or
not) without stealing it, any later assumption of a right to it by keeping or
dealing with it as owner.’ - DPP v Gomez
- Morris - only have to assume one of the rights of an owner for
appropriation
- Lawrence - whether the owner consented to the act is irrelevant
- Appropriation includes the giving of a gift (Hinks)

- Limitations of appropriation:
- ‘Appropriation’ must connote a physical act from D, not a more
remote action that triggered a payment - Briggs (D persuading Vs
to transfer to vendors of a new house but actually transferring
money to D. This was fraud instead).
- Cannot appropriate property more than once - Atakpu
- Facts:
- Ds found in Dover driving cars stolen abroad using
false documents
- Issue:
- Appropriation cannot occur more than once
- Held:
- Theft occurred when cars hired, as this is when they
were appropriated
- Could not be charged with theft again as property
cannot be appropriated twice
- AR (appropriation) missing, convictions quashed
- Obiter - appropriation CAN be continuous, and it is
up to the jury to decide using common sense when
appropriation ends

, - s.3(2) TA 1968 - Statutory exception - genuine purchasers acting in
good faith
- D acquires property ‘for value’
- Must pay for property (doesn't have to be with cash)
- AND D acting ‘in good faith’
- No doubts about the legality of the transaction, and
believed the seller was acting entirely properly.

- Property
- s.4(1) TA 1968 - ‘included money and all other property, real or personal,
including things in action and other intangible property’
- Money
- Cash - any currency
- Real property
- Land and things attached to it, only in the following
circumstances - s.4(2) TA 1968:
- When D is trustee or personal representative, has
power of attorney, liquidator of a company, and sells
land belonging to another and appropriates land or
anything forming part of it in breach of the confidence
bestowed on them
- D not in possession of land and appropriates part of it
by severing it or causing it to be severed
- D in possession of land under a tenancy, and
appropriates whole/part if any fixture or structure fixed
to the land
- E.g. when a tenant leaves, they take the
greenhouse (structure) or shelving (fixture)
- Wild plants and flowers (s.4(3) TA 1968)
- Only count as property for purposes of s.1(1) TA 1968
stealing if done so for a commercial purpose (sale,
reward)
- Wild creatures (s.4(4) TA 1968)
- Can only be stolen if usually kept under the
possession of another (e.g. in a zoo) or has been
reduced into one’s possession (e.g. trapped/hunted)
- Personal property
- All tangible objects that don’t fall under ‘real property’,
including cars, clothes, and prohibited drugs unlawfully in
complainant's possession (R v Smith, Plummer and Haines)
- Things in action

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lawnotes08. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.99
  • (2)
  Add to cart