100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Philosophy of Religion A Level AQA ) (Solved Questions 100% VERIFIED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS) £8.39   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Philosophy of Religion A Level AQA ) (Solved Questions 100% VERIFIED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS)

 0 view  0 purchase

a posteriori ANS:from observation Inductive ANS:based on probability Palsy's three observations ANS:Complexity, purpose and regularity Natural Theology, Paley quote ANS:"That designer must have been a person and that person is God." Paley's illustrations to support his argument ANS:the eye, fis...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • October 11, 2023
  • 7
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (1)
avatar-seller
johnlynnk262
Philosophy of Religion A Level AQA

a posteriori ANS:from observation

Inductive ANS:based on probability

Palsy's three observations ANS:Complexity, purpose and regularity

Natural Theology, Paley quote ANS:"That designer must have been a person and that person is God."

Paley's illustrations to support his argument ANS:the eye, fish and their gills and regularity of universe

Hume's rejections of the idea of design ANS:mechanistic analogies are inappropriate, the apparent order
could be due to chance

Hume's criticisms of the designer ANS:mechanistic analogy is anthropomorphic, not necessarily God of
christian theism , problem of evil

Value of design argument for religious faith ANS:rationally and empirically based, consistent with biblical
teaching, fits Price's argument of 'belief in' and 'belief that'

No value of design argument for religious faith ANS:Fideists dont need rationality, doesn't address
problem of evil

Anthropic Principle ANS:universe is created for humans

Design argument as proof ANS:most things in life are based on inductive arguments, laws of nature
require explanation

Design argument as insufficient proof ANS:as an inductive argument cannot offer absolute proof, his
observations can be explained naturally e.g rotations due to gravity

Prices view on religious faith ANS:should include belief in and belief that

Fedeism ANS:view that religion is a matter of pure faith

Belief that ANS:acceptance of propositions

belief in ANS:attitude of commitment and trust

Pope John Paul II on Faith and reason ANS:Faith and reason are like two wings on which the human
spotify rises to the contemplation of truth

a priori ANS:from theory with no experience of world

, deductive ANS:reasoning from general to specific

What type of argument is the design argument? ANS:a posteriori and inductive

What type of argument is the Ontological argument ANS:a priori and deductive

analytic statement ANS:based on logic and true by definition

Predicate ANS:information about the subject

Anselm's definition of God ANS:that which nothing greater can be conceived

Necessary truth in ontological argument ANS:God exists

Proslogium 2 ANS:God exists in mind and reality since nothing is greater than existing in both

Proslogium 3 ANS:God is a necessary being since it is greater to be a necessary being than a contingent
one

Contingent being ANS:may or may not exist, dependent on something else

Psalm 14:1 ANS:The fool says in his heart, "There is no God."

Gaunilo's "on behalf of the fool" ANS:lost perfect island criticism

Anselm's response to Gaunilo ANS:islands are contingent god is not

Kant's criticisms of Ontological argument ANS:existence is not a predicate, something cannot be defined
into existence

Kant's view of existence ANS:existence is synthetic not analytic

Barth's view of Anselm ANS:Anselm had a religious experience

Strengths of Ontological argument ANS:deductive so not based on probability, independent of human
observation, if there is a God Anselm's definition makes sense

Weaknesses of Ontological argument ANS:Kant's challenges suggest do not work,

Ontological argument as proof ANS:deductive means it isnt merely on probability, faith-based
acceptance,some say intended as assurance

Ontological argument as insufficient proof ANS:proves if God exists he exists necessarily, confirmation
not proof

Value of ontological argument for faith ANS:works as confirmation, shows preheld beliefs as rational,
reasoned 'belief that' supports 'belief in'

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller johnlynnk262. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £8.39. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75619 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£8.39
  • (0)
  Add to cart