100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A Critical Evaulation of the Overturning of Roe v Wade £7.49   Add to cart

Essay

A Critical Evaulation of the Overturning of Roe v Wade

 0 view  0 purchase

This essay critically evaluates the overturning of Roe v Wade from a gendered perspective. It looks at both sides of the overturning including the representation of women and fetus. how it disproportionately affects women of colour and also looks at the argument of conservative women on abortion

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • December 9, 2023
  • 8
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
avatar-seller
aylasyed
32798512


Critical evaluation of Roe v. Wade



Roe v. Wade was a legal case in 1973 which meant that the criminalisation of abortion ‘violated a

woman’s constitutional right of privacy’ (Britannica, 2023). Roe v. Wade marked a historic moment in

America, as it allowed women the choice to have a safe abortion. However, in 2022 this was

overturned, meaning one had ‘no constitutional right to abort’ (Britannica, 2023). The overturning

was particularly controversial as it was a draft written by Justice Samuel Alito and leaked, marking

the first time a draft was ‘disclosed publicly while a case was still pending’ (Gerstein and Ward,

2022). At the core of Roe v. Wade is the debate between pro-life and pro-choice. Those that are

pro-life argue for the life of the baby and that the baby has a ‘right to life’ while pro-choice highlights

the right for women to make their own choices for their own bodies. This debate and the overturning

of Roe v. Wade allows us to critically analyse gender in two forms: those who campaigned for the

abortion ban and those impacted by the change. For example, pro-choice argues for the representation

of women's choice and pro-life represents the unborn fetus. Intersectional feminists argue that

abortion disproportionately impacts women of colour (WoC) (Cohen, 2008) whereas pro-life

republican women are introducing a new angle to feminism.



With the US having an abortion rate of 19.8 (per 1000 women) (Statista, 2022) Roe v. Wade and its

overturning can be argued to represent a multitude of people. Pitkin (1967) talks about the different

concepts of representation, for example, formalistic, descriptive, substantive and symbolic

representation. However, substantive representation “will "act for" and pursue the interests of women

as a group” (Rosenthal, 1995: 601) this particularly resonates with Roe v. Wade from two

perspectives. Firstly, Roe v Wade saw seven of nine supreme court judges, that were all men, pass the

bill to make abortion constitutional (Garrett, 2022) this saw them substantively represent the interest

of women’s safety and right to have a choice on their own body. On a larger scale, this meant that

women that were pregnant either too young, harassed, financially unprepared or simply were not

ready to have a child were able to make a choice and safely abort the baby. The Supreme court acted

, 32798512


in the interest of the women. However, the overturning of Roe v Wade introduces our second

perspective of the Bill. The Supreme Court saw a six to three ruling with the only three ruling against

the bill being the liberal members of the court (González and Alberti, 2019). This meant that

individual states have access to ban abortion in all or some instances (Sun, 2022). The question begs,

who does this represent? As figure one displays the US has been evenly divided on the topic of

abortion for many years, therefore, the establishment and overturning of Roe v. Wade arguably only

substantively represented half the US population of those affected by the law. However, as figure 1

shows, there was a significant change in 2022 after the overturning that showed 55 per cent of the US

population consider themselves pro-choice. Therefore, it can be argued that the overturning does not

accurately and substanitvely represent the group of women in the US that should be represented.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller aylasyed. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62890 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£7.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart