100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Notes on Nature of Human Rights £4.49   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Birkbeck, University Of London (BBK)
  4.  
  5. Law LLB
  6.  
  7. International Protection of Human Rights (LA2029)

Essay

Notes on Nature of Human Rights
 167 views  1 purchase

A well-written structured note on any essay question about Nature of Human Rights (A must exam question) . You can easily score a merit on the given topic by revising these notes and doing a few past paper question in light of these notes.

Preview 1 out of 7  pages

Document information

  • August 17, 2019
  • 7
  • 2018/2019
  • Essay
  • -
  • Merit

Subjects

  • iphr
  • international protection of human rights

Written for

All documents for this subject (1)

Seller

avatar-seller
myr4

Available practice questions

Nature of Human Rights

Flashcards 4 Flashcards
£4.49 0 sales
Flashcards 4 Flashcards
£4.49 0 sales

Some examples from this set of practice questions

1.

Definition of Human Rights- Layman definition

Answer: \"rights one enjoys simply by virtue of being human\"

2.

Merits of Layman definition of HR

Answer: It does not necessarily make the rights legally enforceable or fundamental. Unless a positive legal source states that they are fundamental, human rights fall short of legal claims and enforceability.

Content preview

IPHR - Nature of Human Rights

(Contention and Confusion over meaning HR)

(The statement under consideration primarily revolves around):

The nature of human rights a controversial aspect of human rights law. It is given that human
rights are cultivated by historical social, and cultural developments with their most prominent
codification being the International Bill of Rights which consists of the UDHR, the ICCPR, and the
ICESCR. The statement addresses the disputed nature of these rights, particularly as to their
universality, a debate which arose in the Vienna Conference 1993. This essay will seek to address
the validity of this debate considering its consequences for human rights development as a whole.

Definition of HR

To begin with, it is imperative to note that the very definition of human rights has been
contested. While a layman might define human rights as rights one enjoys simply by virtue of
being human, this does not necessarily make them legally enforceable or fundamental. Unless a
positive legal source states that they are fundamental, human rights fall short of legal claims and
can perhaps be thought of, as Donnelly puts it, political claims providing a moral standard,
illustrating ultimately a distinction between the fundamental legal nature and political nature of
human rights in the international law.

UDHR-Universalism

The UDHR propagates the theory of universalism which comprises of three main themes. Firstly,
human rights exist objectively, they exist for each individual, regardless of their culture, religion,
ideology, morality, economic development etc. Secondly, they pre-exist laws; they are enforced
and ensured by, not derive from positive law. Lastly, they are inalienable (preamble).This is
because all human beings are born free and equal (Art 1 UDHR, USDI 1776, FDRM 1789). Since
rights exist by virtue of humanity, they cannot be taken away/forfeited/denounced without
endangering the same. While (there were and are contention as to definition of human, basis
and moral, legal or political nature of rights but) this was a much needed proclamation to try
and posit a universal value after the catastrophes of the Second World War, which saw horrific
systematic abuses of human rights.

Relativism

However, it was not whole wholeheartedly welcomed by all. The other side of the debate is
Cultural Relativism, which put simply claims that there are no universal human values or
practices or even needs (and hence insists on ‘more culturally variable understandings of human
rights). This became evident during the Vienna Conference 1993, the 45th anniversary of the
UDHR which was attended by 171 states and certain NGOs. Dissenting states, namely China,
Malaysia, Singapore, Cuba, and the former USSR, challenged the universality of human rights
with two major contentions. Firstly ,as regard to content and priorities, , the UDHR only caters to

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller myr4. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.49  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart