100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
DD310 ‘Mad or Bad’ TMA 02 - Critically discuss the role of the socio-cultural issues of race, gender, age, and class in the case study.$24.44
Add to cart
DD310 ‘Mad or Bad’ EMA - Write a report that evaluates the specific challenges and issues that might be faced by a prison planning to implement a therapeutic service
DD310 ‘Mad or Bad’ TMA 03 - Sexual Assault in Adults
All for this textbook (7)
Written for
The Open University (OU)
The Open University
Mad or bad a critical approach to counselling and forensic psychology (DD310)
All documents for this subject (5)
18
reviews
By: gl1 • 1 year ago
By: lizayasinzadeh • 1 year ago
By: katiepackman • 1 year ago
By: ashleighstewart1 • 1 year ago
By: ambergodden • 1 year ago
By: lizlongmuir • 2 year ago
By: tb573473 • 2 year ago
Show more reviews
Seller
Follow
Farbiie
Reviews received
Content preview
DD310
TMA 02
Critically discuss the role of the socio-cultural issues of race, gender, age, and class in the
case study.
Socio-cultural factors, including race, class, age and gender are some of society’s existing
systems that influence our choices and identity. While some of these factors are
dichotomous as you are either rich or poor; young or old, others like race or gender are not
so straightforward. As a result, a person’s agency, identity and mental health are shaped by
each socio-cultural factor and its intersection. For example, a large number of people from
Black Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups experience more disadvantage both in the
mental health and criminal justice sectors due to several aspects of inequality, which they
experience from several socio-cultural factors (Sewell, 2017, p. 69). This essay will critically
apply the relevance of race, gender, age and class in Ronald’s case study and how each
socio-cultural factor intersect with one another.
Within the criminal justice system (CJS), Black people are highly over-represented (Sewell,
2017). The 2013/14 statistics in England and Wales on ethnicity and race revealed that 13%
of Black people were remanded in custody, despite accounting for 3% of the population; stop
and searches were more likely to be carried on Black people than other groups; and Black
people were three times more likely to be arrested and prosecuted than White/Chinese and
other groups (Ministry of Justice, 2015c, cited in Sewell, 2017, p. 74).
Additionally, institutional racism, (resulting from the stereotypes that BAME people are
considered more threatening and prone to violence) influences all stages of ethnic
inequalities in the CJS, specifically in ways BAME people are targeted by the police and how
they are treated within the CJS (Sewell, 2017, p. 75). These ethnic inequalities within the
CJS are echoed in Ronald’s case-study(e.g.) target of stop and searches; six-months
detention and training order; and six years prison sentence; and thus, demonstrates the
relevance of race for Ronald, and the strong stereotypical relationship between race and
criminality (Sewell, 2017, p. 74).
One-way ethnic inequality is reinforced within the CJS is the different likelihood of ethnic
groups’ encounter with Taser use by the police (The Open University, 2018). For example,
Black people are three times more likely to be involved in a Taser incident than White people
(Home Office, 2013). In 2010-14 in England and Wales, the likelihood of Black people being
tasered was 18 per 10,000 populations, whereas Asian people was 3 per 10,000 and White
people, 6 per 10,000 (Home Office, 2013). Although it is unclear whether these figures
reflect discrimination by police officers or that some ethnic groups are much more likely to be
in situations where a Taser might be used (Home Office, 2013) (i.e. Black people being
targeted by the police). Nonetheless it mirrors the over-representation of Black people and
the ethnic inequalities they experience within the CJS. Therefore, race shapes how Ronald
is seen and treated as a Black person within the CJS; and how he also sees himself.
Furthermore, Taylor et al., (1973, cited in Holman, 2017, p. 116) strongly argues that
working-class crime is over-represented in the CJS due to the way policing is organised,
class bias in the court and the cost of legal defence. Class therefore highlights the
association between several socio-economical inequalities, criminality and harsh treatments
within the CJS (Sewell, 2017, p. 68). Class is the differences in people’s occupation, levels
of income, education (Holman, 2017, p. 110), social connection (‘who you know’), and
cultural knowledge and understanding (cultural capital) (Bourdieu, 2002, cited in Holman,
2017, p. 110), which then influences one’s identity.
As a working class, Ronald has no class-related power or resources and this limitation is
reinforced by his six years prison sentence on his self-defence case. For example, a judge
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Farbiie. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $24.44. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
