100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary EU law - steps necessary in answering (exam) question, including brief summaries $9.54   Add to cart

Summary

Summary EU law - steps necessary in answering (exam) question, including brief summaries

 33 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This document provides a step-by-step model for answering (exam) questions. It contains relevant case law, provisions, and explanations.

Preview 2 out of 19  pages

  • June 26, 2021
  • 19
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Ch 1: introduction EU
Ch 2: development of EU
Ch 3: EU’s political institutions
Lecture 1
-

Lecture 2
 Principle of conferral: EU has competence to act
 Principle of subsidiarity: action of MS insufficient to achieve certain purpose
o Subsidiarity test (when shall the Union act?) p. 112
 Principle not applicable in areas of Union’s exclusive competences, so
there must be no action in areas where the Union enjoys exclusive
competence (art. 2(1) and 3 TFEU list of exclusive competences)
 The objective of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved
by MS
 By reason of scale or effects of the proposed action, the objective can
be better achieved at Union level, in other words, the Union action
would provide added value over action by MS acting individually
 Principle of proportionality: action of EU must be limited to what is necessary to
achieve objectives of treaties. Content and form of action must be in keeping with
aim pursued
o Trailers: regulation is suitable to reach the goal proposed. Measures must be
necessary in the sense that less restrictive measures aren’t available or
wouldn’t be effective

 Protocol NO. 2 on the Application of the Principle of Subsidiarity and Proportionality

Ch 5: legislation in EU. (3 principles)
Ch 6: effect of EU law in national legal systems (direct and indirect effect)

, Ch 6
Tutorial 1: Direct Effect
 Direct effect Treaty provisions (Van Gend en Loos), transposition not necessary
o (primary law)  individual vs. MS (vertical) OR (horizontal) p. 16 notes p. 147
and further
 TEST  to produce direct effect, provision must include an obligation for MS that is:
o 1. Clear
o 2. Unconditional (MS has no reservation)
o 3. Implementation measures not required

 Regulations direct effect (horizontal and vertical) p. 151 & notes p. 22
o Provisions precise and clear
o No implementation required

 Can directives have a direct effect? YES (Van Duyn v Home Office) and (Becker) p. 17
notes 
o vertical direct effect!! (no horizontal direct effect, directives binding on MS
(Marshall)
 TEST  individuals can invoke provisions included in a Directive against a MS when
(Becker):
o 1. Subject matter/provision sufficiently precise and unconditional
o 2. Deadline expired and no (correct) implementation measures at national
level
o 3. Provisions define right which individuals are able to assert against the State
(aka vertical application)
o (confer rights to individuals? P. 83 notes)
 Van Duyn
o 1. Rule of behavior is clear
o 2. Deadline to implement Directive is expired (Ratti)
o 3. MS did not implement the Directive….
o 4. … or partially/incorrectly implemented (Becker)

 Directives can have direct effect against State, even when it’s acting as employer (in
its private function) (Foster) (zie summary van vera)
An MS which has not adopted the implementing measures required by
 Estoppel argument (Marshall, Becker, Ratti) directive within prescribed period may not plead, as against individuals, its
own failure to perform the obligation which the directive entails (Ratti)

 Indirect effect EU law: EU law sources, which don’t have direct effect, can still be
indirectly invoked within a national legal system (Von Colson).
o Duty of consistent interpretation/indirect effect: duty of all national bodies
to interpret all national law in light of and in conformity with EU law
o Duty of sincere cooperation (art. 4(3) TFEU)

Principle of primacy: EU law prevails over national law p. 83 notes (Costa) (Simmenthal)
1. ‘sui generis’ legal order
2. MS permanent limitation of sovereignty
3. EU law same effect in all legal order
4. National judges disapply national norms and apply EU law

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fleurdonders. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.54. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76669 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.54
  • (0)
  Add to cart