100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
NR508_Week_2_Discussion-REVIEWED BY EXPERTS $13.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

NR508_Week_2_Discussion-REVIEWED BY EXPERTS

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Claudia is a 36-year-old mother of two G2P2, she recently delivered her last child 9 months ago, and has been using condoms for birth control for the last 7 months. Today she is requesting a more reliable birth control, she is not sure of her current pregnancy plans, however, she does not wish to...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 110  pages

  • July 6, 2021
  • 110
  • 2020/2021
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
Week 2: Discussion

53 53 unread replies. 74 74 replies.




Claudia is a 36-year-old mother of two G2P2, she recently delivered her last child 9 months ago, and has
been using condoms for birth control for the last 7 months. Today she is requesting a more reliable birth
control, she is not sure of her current pregnancy plans, however, she does not wish to discuss
sterilization. No religious contraindications for treatment. Previous methods include condoms, and oral
contraceptive pills. She thought about an IUD but is concerned her husband may feel it during intimacy.



PMH: positive for mild hypertension with first pregnancy, seasonal allergies.



Surgeries: Left inguinal hernia and tonsillectomy.



Family history: Mother HTN and Father colon CA both deceased



Social History: Denies tobacco use, wine one to two glasses a week, denies recreational drugs, exercises
twice a week.



Drug allergies-Sulfa causes a rash. Current medications-MVI with Fe, Calcium chews, prn Allegra for
allergies. Height 67 inches, weight 157 pounds, BP 110/75, P 70, R 16. PAP collected today, breast exam
WNL, urine pregnancy negative.



Physical exam is normal.



What are your treatment goals for Claudia today?

What are two possible contraceptive methods for Claudia? Please give brief rationale for each.

Pick one method and list five (5) patient-centered teaching points for the method you chose today.

,What would your contraceptive choice be if Claudia smoked 10-15 cigarettes per day? Explain your
answer.

Search entries or author

Search entries or author

Filter replies by unread

Reply Reply to Week 2: Discussion

Collapse SubdiscussionPatrick Ryan

Patrick Ryan

Jan 7, 2019 Jan 7 at 9:26am

Class,



This week, we will discuss Claudia, a 26-year-old who presents for contraceptive needs. Please read her
case study outlined above, and discuss in detail. Remember to always use evidence-based resources in
your responses.



Dr Ryan



Reply Reply to Comment

Collapse SubdiscussionJason Kissick

Jason Kissick

Jan 13, 2019 Jan 13 at 2:29pm

Dr. Ryan and classmates,



My treatment goal for Claudia is to address her desire to use a more reliable birth control. I would
educate Claudia on the different forms of contraception, and answer any questions she has so she can
choose the best option for her and her husband. According to Woo and Robinson, the treatment goals
for pharmacological contraception are “to use the safest, best-tolerated, and most effective method that
the patient desires” (2016).

, The first step in choosing the right contraceptive for Claudia is to eliminate the methods that are
contraindicated due to her age, weight, or health, as well as the methods that have been already ruled-
out by personal preference. Starting with personal preference, an intrauterine device (IUD) will not be
discussed because her husband has voiced concerns about feeling it during intimacy. Secondly, condoms
will not be discussed because Claudia and her husband have used those for seven months and are
looking for a more reliable form of birth control. Since body mass index (BMI) is used for selecting an
appropriate birth control, Claudia’s BMI will need to be calculated. In addition, her home medications
will have to be cross-checked for any possible reactions to birth control.



Claudia has a normal BMI of 24.6, is a non-smoker, has a medical history of gestational
hypertension and seasonal allergies, and takes over-the-counter allergy medication and vitamins.
Furthermore, Claudia and her husband are uncertain of their pregnancy plans. After considering all of
the available information, two viable forms of contraception for Claudia and are oral contraceptives and
a diaphragm.



Given Claudia’s health history and the fact she is a non-smoker, I would recommend a combined
oral contraceptives (COC). In fact, COCs are most common form of birth control used in the United States
(Marlene, 2013). Secondly, combined oral contraceptives are safe for Claudia to use if she is still
breastfeeding. According to United States Medical Eligibility Criteria (US MEC) for contraceptive use,
COCs are a classification-2 for woman over the age of 35, who have a history of gestational hypertension
(Centers for Disease Control and prevention, 2017). The CDC defines the US MEC classification-2 as “A
condition for which the advantages of using the method generally outweigh the theoretical or proven
risks” (2017).



There are two types of combined or contraceptives (COCs), monophasic and multiphasic.
Monophasic COCs are the most commonly prescribed oral contraceptive in the United States (Marlene,
2013). Monophasic birth control pills have the same amount of estrogen and progestin in each pill. An
advantage with monophasic pills are woman experience less side effects that are associated with
fluctuating hormone levels. Multiphasic birth control pills have different levels of estrogen and progestin
in each pack. The purpose of multiphasic birth control is to limit a female’s exposure to hormones while
still suppressing ovulation (Allen, Evans, & Sutton, 2016).



The second method of contraception I would recommend to Claudia is a diaphragm. Like
condoms, diaphragms are a barrier contraceptive. However, when combined with a spermicide,
diaphragms are more effective then condoms (Allen, 2004). A contraceptive diaphragm is a circular

, dome made of thin, soft silicone that can be inserted into the vagina before sex. The diaphragm covers
the cervix which prevents sperm from being able travel to the fallopian tube and fertilize an egg.



The method I chose for Claudia was the combined oral contraceptive, Ethinyl
Estradiol/Norgestimate. The brand name for this birth control is Ortho Tri-Cyclen. The first patient-
centered teaching point of using Ortho Tri-Cyclen is to explain the mechanism of action, which is
ovulation suppression and thickening of cervical mucous which prevents sperm penetration. The second
patient-centered teaching point is because Claudia has never been on any hormonal contraception, she
will need to start taking the pills on the first day of her menstrual cycle or the first Sunday after start of
menstrual cycle. Thirdly, if Claudia began smoking or started having migraines, she would need to stop
taking Ortho Tri-Cyclen because those are contraindications. The fourth teaching point would be possible
side effects, which include nausea, vomiting, cramping, bloating, and breast tenderness. The last
teaching point is Claudia will need to use an alternate contraceptive method while taking an antibiotic
(Ortho Tr-Cyclen, 2018).



The combination of high dosages of estrogen and smoking have a synergistic effect which
increases the risks of a myocardial infarction and/or a stroke (Ethinyl Estradiol/Norgestimate, 2019).
Therefore, if Claudia is over the age 35 and smokes more than 10 cigarettes a day, she will need to be
switched to norethindrone, which is a progestogen-only pill. The mechanism of action is the same as
Ortho Tri-Cyclen. However, the biggest difference in these contraceptives is progestogen-only pills have
to be taken at the same time every day or could be ineffective (Norethindrone, 2018).



References



Allen, C., Evans, G., & Sutton, E. L. (2016). Pharmacologic Therapies in Women’s Health.



Contraception and Menopause Treatment. Medical Clinics of North America, 100, 763–



doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2016.03.008

Allen, R. E. (2004). Diaphragm fitting. American Family Physician, 69(1), 97-100. Retrieved



From https://www.aafp.org/afp/2004/0101/p97.html

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Themanehoppe. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $13.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81849 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$13.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart