100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
IRIO International Law Lectures $7.02   Add to cart

Class notes

IRIO International Law Lectures

 26 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Table of contents Lecture 1: The actors on the legal stage Lecture 2: International law-making - treaties and CIL Lecture 3: The Scope of Legal Authority: Jurisdiction of States / Immunities Lecture 4: Do Human Rights matter? Lecture 5: Holding actors into account Lecture 6: Settling Dispu...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 42  pages

  • August 14, 2021
  • 42
  • 2021/2022
  • Class notes
  • Dr. wolf
  • All classes
avatar-seller
International Law Lectures 2020/2021

Table of contents

Lecture 1: The actors on the legal stage .............................................................. 2
Lecture 2: International law making - treaties and CIL ....................................... 4
Lecture 3: The Scope of Legal Authority: Jurisdiction of States / Immunities .. 11
Lecture 4: Do Human Rights matter? ............................................................... 20
Lecture 5: Holding actors into account ............................................................. 24
Lecture 6: Settling Disputes Peacefully under International Law ..................... 30
Lecture 7: Limits to using force under international law .................................. 36




1

,Lecture 1: The actors on the legal stage

Palestine

- A part of Palestine (Gaza strip) is occupied by Israel and because of that it is not
recognized as a sovereign state under the international law
- It is an observer state within the UN right now
- Why is it good to be a state? = Article 4 of the UN Charter, only peace-loving states
can become members of the UN

Recognition (general)

- Of states and of governments (mainly focused on recognition of states)
- Declaratory (fulfilment Montevideo convention criteria are enough to be a state = this
theory prevails) and constitutive (the fulfilment of those criteria is not enough to be a
state = this one still plays a role) theories
- Should human rights be also added to the criteria?
- Democracy – human rights?
- Collective non-recognition (Rhodesia; TRN Cyprus; Bantustans) – Annexation
Crimea?
- Collective recognition?

- through membership of the United Nations

- as party to international conventions (ICC Statute)

- or to other organizations (ICC)

- Criteria for admission (Art. 4.1 Charter)
- Some (historic) flexibility – e.g. India/Belarus/Congo

Effects of recognition

- In international law

§ Mainly political

§ No direct effect on status of the entity claiming to be a state; recognition as
evidence of acceptance of the facts

- In internal law

§ Dependent on the internal law, e.g. the capacity to sue or to be sued before a
domestic court, immunities

- Practical effects for Palestine of confirmation of statehood
- Sovereign equality and territorial integrity
- immunities/use of force/non-intervention/treaties/ICJ/ICC

2

, - Rights and duties and capacity to bring claims!
- International legal personality (Reparations for Injuries case) = state has rights and
obligations after this

Conclusion on the Status of Palestine

- A State according to the ‘objective’ criteria
- However, limited internal and international capacity due to occupation, but recognised
as a State by 138 states, though not yet full UN member.
- Continues to be an occupied territory

- That status defines the obligations of the occupying power and the rights
of the people living in the territory, not the status of the entity

- Determining its status requires interpretation of facts and law: know the relevant
legal arguments

Rights of Peoples: self-determination

- External self-determination

§ Applicable to colonial peoples and peoples living in other Non-Self-Governing
Territories, or under alien domination
§ Art. 1(2), 55 and Chapter XI UN Charter
§ GA Res. 1514 (1960)
§ Common art. 1 UN to the 1966 Conventions on Human Rights
§ GA. Res. 2625 (1970)
§ Western Sahara case; East Timor case (right erga omnes); Wall Opinion
§ Recent Chagos Advisory Opinion by ICJ

- Palestinian people: the right to self-determination is firmly established (Wall case,
para 88, 118, 122, 156); see also recent General Assembly resolution adopted in
December 2020 (A/RES/75/172)
- Uti possidetis

- Former Yugoslavia; Badinter Commission

- Internal self-determination of peoples

- The right to participate in public life of the state concerned and to enjoy
social/cultural/linguistic or other group rights (minorities v. people)
- But who are peoples? = usually minorities

- Self-determination of indigenous peoples

- UN Declaration on Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) 2007
(A/RES/61/295)


3

, - Territorial integrity vs. Secession
- Secession of Quebec case
- Kosovo: can the creation of an independent state be based on the right to
selfdetermination?
- ICJ advisory opinion on Kosovo (July 2010): No answer
- Catalonia, Scotland, Crimea
- secession should happen with the approval of the mother land

Other participants in international law

- International organisations
§ See Advis. Opinion – Reparation for Injuries
- Individuals (lecture 4)
§ Rights, duties and capacity
- human rights
- International criminal law
- Corporations
§ Investment protection (ISDS)
§ Subject to international legal norms
§ Mechanisms to hold corporations internationally accountable?
- Human Rights Council A/HRC/RES/17/4 and A/HRC/17/31
- Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (protect, respect and remedy)
- NGOs



Lecture 2: International law making - treaties and CIL
- How to determine what are legally binding obligations under international law?
- What makes this complex? – what are main theoretical approaches?

Law or Politics?

- How to determine what are legally binding obligations?
§ Art. 38.1 Statute of the ICJ
- More complex law-making in a more complex society, other actors besides states
adopt different norms that have legal impact in international law. Even though it is not
the same impact as international treaties do have but still
- There needs to be a discussion regarding creation of treaties:
§ More decision-making in international organizations
- Role of values and principles
§ Creation of treaty regimes
- The way are treaties created also matters
§ Majority decision-making
§ Normative hierarchy (jus cogens, obligations erga omnes) – what these
roles play in international law


4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller dotrug. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.02. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.02  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart