100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
AC 1.3 Explain the consequences of unreported crime Unit 1 Criminology $4.80   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

AC 1.3 Explain the consequences of unreported crime Unit 1 Criminology

1 review
 1633 views  6 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

AC 1.3 Explain the consequences of unreported crime Unit 1 Criminology WJEC Changing awareness of crime

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • November 23, 2021
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: eviewhotton2 • 2 year ago

reply-writer-avatar

By: studyinqpeachy • 2 year ago

thank you so much for the review!

avatar-seller
1.3 Explain the consequences of unreported crime

There are many consequences of crimes going unreported. Some consequences of
unreported crime include: the ripple effect, decriminalisation, police prioritisation, unrecorded
crime, cultural change, legal change and procedural change.

Ripple effect
The ripple effect is when unreported cases lead to not only the primary victims being
affected, but secondary victims being affected, such as the community or as society as a
whole. Secondary victims are often not involved with the crime, and are unaware that the
crime is going on until it reaches them, which may be via news, word of mouth, newspaper,
social media, etc. An example of the ripple effect is evident in the case of domestic abuse.
Not only are the primary victims, mostly women, affected by domestic abuse, but also the
secondary victims, likely to be the local communities, affected by the shock of domestic
abuse. Secondary victims may likely be shocked that the crime has been committed. One
negative consequence of the ripple effect is that it may cause a fear amongst the secondary
victims of the case, as they may fear the crime repeating, or happening to themselves.
Another negative consequence of the ripple effect is a lack of trust within the community
being formed, and this may cause secondary victims to be wary of each other, as well as the
police.

Decriminalisation
Decriminalisation is when some crimes go widespread amongst society, even though the law
is still in place. This eventually leads to the decriminalisation of a crime due to many people
committing the crime and its on-going nature amongst society. If the crime that is widespread
keeps on going unreported, it may eventually no longer be seen as a crime and is morally
acceptable within society. An example of this would be that in 1967, two men were legally
allowed to be in a relationship without fear of being arrested. This proved that a crime being
more widespread could lead to the decriminalisation of a crime. A positive consequence of
decriminalisation is the fact that it may lead to some crimes being made legal which are
morally right and benefit a lot of people in society (e.g same sex marriage). However, a
negative consequence of decriminalisation is the fact that some people may not be
supportive of the decriminalisation of a crime, which may lead to rebellion or protests
amongst the community. Another consequence of decriminalisation is that it could lead to the
cirm increasing due to more people doing it (e.g the push to decriminalize the use of
cannabis for medical purposes).

Police prioritisation
Police prioritisation means that the police will give protisies to certain crimes over other
crimes. There are several reasons for this happening. The first reason is a lack of resources
or limited amount of resources, meaning that police units will often have to budget according
to which crimes they will investigate. A second reason is the acknowledgement of the local
population, meaning that some crimes may need to be tackled due to the amount of public
attention they are receiving. A third reason is the media, meaning that police may focus on a
crime which is deemed as new-worthy to draw attention to the crime (e.g the case of Jimmy
Savel). A forth reason is the home office, meaning that there may be certain proirityies which
the home office set for police to investigate (e.g human trafficking). A positive consequence
of police prioritisation is that crimes which follow similar trends or of high rates of offending

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller studyinqpeachy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.80. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79223 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.80  6x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart