100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Conflict of Laws Summary + Weekly Questions (week 6-12) $27.68   Add to cart

Summary

Conflict of Laws Summary + Weekly Questions (week 6-12)

1 review
 47 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

The summary contains the weekly topics which are discussed throughout the course and the weekly guiding questions with the relevant 7 steps and answers. The document provides an overview of how to analyse PIL Questions in the Exam and contains the following topics: 1) Jurisdiction I: intro & choice...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 80  pages

  • June 19, 2022
  • 80
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: alexblockie2022 • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
Weeks PIL Question Case examples Instruments

Week 6 Jurisdiction ● 2 companies Brussels I-bis
with CoC Regulation
Clause

Week 7 Jurisdiction Brussels I-bis
Regulation

Week 8 Jurisdiction Brussels I-bis
Regulation

Week 9 Recognition and ● Brussels I-bis
Enforcement Regulation
● The Hague
Choice of
Court
Convention

Week 10 Choice of Law: ● Rome I
Contract ● CISG
→ Applicable Law

Week 11 Choice of Law:
Contract
→ Applicable Law

Week 12 Choice of Law: Tort ● Rome II
→ Applicable Law ● The Hague
Traffic
Accidents
Convention
● The Hague
Product
Liability
Convention




Week 6 - Jurisdiction I: intro & choice of court
Brussels I-bis Regulation

Scope


Substantive scope: Art. 1
● Art 1(1): Civil and commercial matters

, ○ contract law
○ tort law,
○ company and property law
○ → autonomous concept at EU level (no distinction between MS what
the definition entails) e.g. compensation for war crime by a state
would be still in a public law matter
● Art 1(2): Excluded: family law and law of persons, bankruptcy, social security, arbitration

● LTU v. Eurocontrol: objectives of convention / regulation and general principles in all MS
(thus contract with public authority that acts in exercise of its powers excluded)



Temporal Scope Art 66 and 81
● 10.01. 2015 is the relevant date
● If the proceedings started after that date
● It does not matter when the tort took or contract took place
● Date when the proceedings started not when the contract was concluded
● Art 81 & 66 → when the proceeding started
● Jurisdiction: when proceeding started
● Applicable Law: when the contract was concluded



Geographical scope: main rule Art.4-6
● = which criteria apply to limit the application of this instrument
● Art 4: Main rule: Defendant has to be domiciled in EU-MS (see Art. 62 and 63)
○ How to know the domicile:
● Article 62: if the defendant is a natural person → refers to national law
● Article 63: if the defendant is a legal person (business with legal personality)unified for
EU; applicable to find out the domicile
○ 3 different places where the legal person can have the domicile Art 63(1)
■ Statutory seat Art 63(1)(a) or
■ Central administration Art 63(1)(b) or
■ Principle place of business Art 63(1)(c)
- → met if one of them is in the EU
- If companies have different places in Art 63, then multiple domicile
- Art 63: defendant’s domicile is in _
- Domicile is not sufficient when there is a CoC Clause or weaker party is
involved etc → different geographical scope in Art 25,...


Main rule Art 4 Step 4
Alternative jurisdiction rules Art 7-9 Step 4
Special rules (e.g. for consumers, Art 10-23 Step 3
employment, insurance)

,Exclusive jurisdiction rules Art 24 Step 1
Forum clause Art 25 Step 2
Tacit submission Art 26 Step 5
→ not in a chronological
Lis pendens Art 29-34 order
Provisional/protective Art 35


○ 4 different Articles to apply an alternative geographical scope to Article 4

Exception to main rule in Art 4-6 / alternative geographical scope

a. Is Art 24 applicable? Immovable Property?
b. Is Art 25 applicable? CoC Clause?


1. Exceptions to main rule Art 24 and Art 25 → regardless of domicile of the
parties

, Article 24: Exclusive Jurisdiction - Property
(→ one court has the power to adjudicate a case to the exclusion of all other courts; no other court
than listed)
➔ regardless of the parties’ domicile

● Article 24: 5 different individual grounds of exclusive jurisdiction
Different Geographical Scope to main rule
● Art 24(1): Court of the country where the immovable property is located will have
exclusive jurisdiction to deal with matters regarding this immovable property.
○ Immovable property needs to be located in MS of EU
○ If so → the regulation is geographically applicable and the courts of
the country where the property is located, will have exclusive
jurisdiction to deal with those matters
○ → country that has the closest connection where the property is
located
○ Parties cannot agree that another court has jurisdiction
○ This court determines whether it has jurisdiction acc to Art 24(1) and exclusion
of all other court in EU

⇥Limited to rights In rem: rights that bind everyone erga omnes;
⇥e.g. selling house - contractual rights and personal right → not part
of Art 24


● Art 24(1) Exception
○ However, in proceedings which have as their object tenancies of immovable
property concluded for temporary private use for a maximum period of six
consecutive months, the courts of the Member State in which the defendant is
domiciled shall also have jurisdiction, provided that the tenant is a natural
person and that the landlord and the tenant are domiciled in the same Member
State;
○ → court where the immovable is located + court where the defendant
is domiciled
○ if both claimant and defendant have a common HR in same country, then
another court of a MS (courts where the defendant is domiciled) should have
exclusive jurisdiction alongside the country where the property is located if the
dispute relates to a short term tenancy of less than 6 months
● Art 24(2)
○ In case of validity, nullity, dissolution companies:
■ Courts of place of seat of company (deal according to national law)
● Art 24 (4)
○ In case of registration or validity; IP rights, trade marks patent, place deposit or
registration,...
■ GAT v. Luk: applies regardless whether validity is raised by way of an
action or as a plea of objection (defence) (!)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sabecke. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $27.68. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$27.68  1x  sold
  • (1)
  Add to cart