Class notes
Fraud Lecture Notes
- Course
- Institution
Criminal law, Fraud Lecture Notes
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
laceybright
Content preview
R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053 - old law on dishonesty (Theft/Fraud), replaced with Ivey.Fraud
Prior to the Fraud Act 2006
“We are not to indict one for making a fool of another” Holt CJ in Jones (1703) 91
Eng Rep 330
Deception of individuals were not recognised under the old law.
Old law only punished certain frauds - one’s that threatened the public.
Common law: conspiracy to defraud.
Theft Act 1968: deception offences = result crimes (prosecution had to establish that
someone gained something from the offence).
e.g., obtaining property/services by deception
Fraud = conduct crime - can be committed regardless of consequence.
No one definition of fraud, three types of fraud, however.
Fraud Act 2006 s.1 - took all deception sections from Theft Act.
Someone commits fraud by -
false representation (s.2)
failing to disclose information (s.3)
abuse of position (s.4)
MENS REA FOR ALL FRAUD OFFENCES IS THE SAME - DISHONESTY AND INTENTION TO MAKE
GAIN/CAUSE LOSS/EXPOSE RISK OF LOSS
Fraud Act 2006, s.2(1) - FALSE REPRESENTATION
Actus reus - false representation
Mens rea - knowing that the representation is/might be false, dishonesty, intention to make
gain/cause loss/expose to risk of loss
D is guilty of fraud if he dishonestly makes a false representation to V knowing that the
representation is false, with intention to make gain, cause loss or expose V to a risk of loss.
What is a representation?
- Any representation as to fact or law, including state of mind (e.g., where D says she
will pay for the goods on delivery when she has no such intention): Fraud Act 2006,
s.2(3)
- Representations to machines (where D submits a representation to a device to
respond with/without human intervention e.g., automated call centres): s.2(5)
- Any method of representation (e.g., written, spoken etc): Idrees v DPP (2011) EWCH
624 (Admin) - D arranged through another person to impersonate him and pass his
driving theory test on his behalf.
- Express (obvious lie e.g., selling a ‘real’ diamond, is actually glass) or implied (not
obvious lie e.g., you imply that you will pay for a bill at a restaurant): s.2(4)
False Representation:
Fraud Act 2006, s.2(2): untrue (e.g., ‘my car has had no problems’ when it has) or misleading
(e.g., ‘my car runs really well’ at the moment is unsaid).
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller laceybright. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.63. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
76462 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now