Can Analytic Philosophy be Systematic, and Ought it to Be?
● Systematic:
○ primarily means demonstrating a system of thought etc; a positive or
normative theory
○ also means adhering to an accepted methodology
● Can analytic philosophy be systematic (in the first sense)?
○ yes, according to many American analytic philosophers such as Quine,
■ analytic philosophy is ‘at least cognate with the natural
sciences’
○ no, according to the later Wittgenstein and Austin
■ sciences aim to establish truths, whereas philosophy
aims to clarify conceptual confusion; to replace a distorted vision with an
undistorted one; to untangle
● ‘to possess a concept is to be the master
of a certain fragment of language’, hence if we are to do philosophy, we
must understand language
○ e.g. we must make
explicit the implicit rules and principles of language
● philosophy does not tell us anything
about what ‘is to be seen’ (what exists?); once the tangle is unpicked, the
philosopher’s work is done
● Austin rejects system through a total reliance on the actual uses of words
○ if we study uses of words well enough without paying attention to ‘the
problems’, they will solve themselves
○ this is an unattractive viewpoint these days (1975)
● Brief history of analytic philosophy
○ analytic philosophy is a cluster of schools, less disparate now (1975) than
it once was. There are three primary reasons for this:
■ 1. acceptance of the primacy and importance of Frege as
the first analytic philosopher
■ 2. American philosophers now big in Britain
■ 3. the focus of philosophy has moved from linguistic
philosophy - which assumed understanding of language and used it as a means
(e.g. Austin?) - to philosophy of language: the attempt to generate a theory of
language
● Frege shifted the starting point in philosophy from epistemology to logic and language
○ it is only through the analysis of language that we can analyse thought
■ thoughts, as opposed to other mental objects, appear to
be wholly communicable
■ we can only clearly understand thought thought through
language - attempting to penetrate to the naked essence of the thought will lead to
confusion between the thought and the subjective accompaniments of thinking
■ in other words, pure, clear thought is necessarily filtered
through language. If we are to understand thought, we must necessarily
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller patrickfleming. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.64. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.