100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
WGU C963 Court Cases; complete updated solution guide_2022 $7.99
Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

WGU C963 Court Cases; complete updated solution guide_2022

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

WGU C963 Court Cases; complete updated solution guide_2022

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • August 26, 2022
  • 4
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
WGU C963 Court Cases; complete updated solution
guide_2022
Marbury v. Madison Correct Answer: This case involved the Judiciary Act of
1789. The Supreme Court declared that the law conflicted with the U.S.
Constitution, and the case established the principle of judicial review wherein the
Supreme Court has the power to declare laws passed by Congress and signed by
the president to be unconstitutional.

Dred Scott v. Sanford Correct Answer: Supreme Court case that decided US
Congress did not have the power to prohibit slavery in federal territories and
slaves, as private property, could not be taken away without due process - basically
slaves would remain slaves in non-slave states and slaves could not sue because
they were not citizens

Plessy v. Ferguson Correct Answer: a 1896 Supreme Court decision which
legalized state ordered segregation so long as the facilities for blacks and whites
were equal

United States v. Miller Correct Answer: 1939; ruled that the National Firearms
Act of 1934 was constitutional, allowing federal govt to ban interstate shipping of
some unregistered guns (because it was unrelated to state militias)

Korematsu v. US Correct Answer: 1944 Supreme Court case where the Supreme
Court upheld the order providing for the relocation of Japanese Americans. It was
not until 1988 that Congress formally apologized and agreed to pay $20,000 2 each
survivor

Brown v Board ofEducation of Topeka (1954) Correct Answer: Supreme Court
ruling that overturned the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case of 1896.
"Separate but equal" is Unconstitutional in the field of public education

Mapp v. Ohio Correct Answer: Established the exclusionary rule was applicable to
the states (evidence seized illegally cannot be used in court)

Gideon v. Wainwright Correct Answer: A person who cannot afford an attorney
may have one appointed by the government

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Classroom. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50843 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.99
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added