100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
A* Essay on why relations broke down between Charles I and Parliament during the Civil War of 1640-49 $7.12
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. PEARSON (PEARSON)
  4.  
  5. History 2015
  6.  
  7. Unit 1C - Britain, 1625-1701: conflict, revolution and settlement

Exam (elaborations)

A* Essay on why relations broke down between Charles I and Parliament during the Civil War of 1640-49
 1 purchase
  • Course
  • Unit 1C - Britain, 1625-1701: conflict, revolution and settlement
  • Institution
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)

This Level 5 answer (as certified by an official examiner) breaks down the reasons for relations to break down between Charles I and Parliament during the Civil War, resulting in the execution of the King in 1649.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

Document information

  • October 18, 2022
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

  • history
  • a level
  • stuart
  • conflict
  • religion
  • catholicism
  • protestantism

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • PEARSON (PEARSON)
  • History 2015
  • Unit 1C - Britain, 1625-1701: conflict, revolution and settlement
All documents for this subject (114)

Seller

avatar-seller
hyltonharvey

Reviews received

Content preview

How accurate is it to say that the actions of parliament were the main reason for the failure of
Charles I and his opponents to reach a negotiated settlement in the years 1640–49?

From the beginning of 1640, efforts were shown by parliament to reach a negotiated
settlement with the King. Having ruled without a parliament for 11 years of tyranny, Charles
still failed to show any desire to negotiate, dissolving the Short Parliament after just 3 weeks
in 1640. While the parliament grew increasingly intolerant of the King's attempts to
continue the war and his refusal to give up any of his royal prerogatives, this intolerance
was justified by the actions of the King who did not seek a settlement at any point. In
examining the reasons for the failure to reach a settlement in the years 1640-49, it is
necessary to consider the reasons for the outbreak of civil war, since Charles proved
unwilling to negotiate once war had begun. It is also necessary to consider the peace
treaties which were offered to Charles and the reasons why they were not accepted.
Ultimately, Charles rejection of the Heads of the Proposals and his refusal to negotiate at his
trial showed that his obstinance was key to the failure to reach a negotiated settlement.

Charles' refusal to negotiate in a way that sought a settlement at any point in this decade
makes him primarily responsible for the failure to reach a negotiated settlement, as he
proves that he would be unwilling to accept even the most generous of peace settlements
from parliament. Charles rejection of the Newcastle Propositions in 1646, in which it was
demanded that he relinquished 20 years of militia control to parliament and abolished the
episcopacy, is somewhat justified, since Charles was very clear on his prioritisation of the
powers of the episcopacy during the personal rule. However, Charles' rejection of the Heads
of Proposals, in 1647, highlights the stubborn, irrational nature of this King. Only demanding
10 years of militia control and limitations on the powers of bishops, the NMA's attempt at a
peace treaty was widely considered to be fair. The King's rejection of this peace treaty
strongly suggests that the King, rather than parliament, was to blame for the failure to reach
a negotiated settlement, since the King was unwilling to accept any peace treaty, but the
parliament tried to offer a chance. Furthermore, the King only finally accepted a negotiation
with the Scots in 1648 to continue the war, agreeing to establish Presbyterianism in
England. This shows that the King was only willing to make a treaty which would continue
the war, stopping at nothing and abandoning the religious objections which had inspired
him to reject the parliament and NMA's attempts at peace. Hence, the King was more
responsible than parliament for the failure to reach a negotiated settlement as the King
showed he was unwilling to negotiate for a settlement, only to continue fighting to impose
his will. Finally, the King's failure to plead his case at the trial for his execution exemplifies
his stubborn nature perfectly. By refusing to acknowledge the validity of the court at his
trial, the King showed that he was unwilling to negotiate under any circumstances and
sacrificed any last opportunity for a negotiated settlement.

Parliament played a role in the failure of the King and his opponents to reach a negotiated
settlement in the 1640s since parliament's offers of a peace treaty consistently overstepped
the mark, leaving little room to negotiate. The most important role of the parliament in
failing to reach a negotiated settlement was in continuing the war, in which the King refused
to acknowledge defeat or compromise. However, even though the parliament triggered the
King's actions, they do not justify his actions, leaving the King primarily at fault. While the
parliament did issue the highly contentious Grand Remonstrance of November 1641, this

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hyltonharvey. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.12. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69052 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$7.12  1x  sold
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added