100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Practical 1 - Omics $7.08   Add to cart

Case

Practical 1 - Omics

 24 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Case of 5 pages for the course EPI4925 Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology at UM (Practical 1 - Omics)

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • November 4, 2022
  • 5
  • 2021/2022
  • Case
  • Matty weijenberg
  • 7-8
avatar-seller
Practical I – Biomarkers: from single markers to omics


QUESTIONS

1. What is the research question of the study by Chen et al, 2015? Does this study focus on
prediction or on understanding? Explain.

The aim of the study is to identify important metabolites to distinguish a normal metabolic state
from an abnormal obesity metabolome.
 Explore the differences between the MHO and MAO groups

The focus of the study is understanding, because they want to find metabolomes that identify
potential metabolic pathways that may regulate the different metabolic characteristics of obesity.

 Etiologic research
o Understand mechanisms
o Aim to establish causality

 But also prediction

2. Does this study examine a biomarker of exposure, susceptibility, or (intermediate) endpoint?
Explain.

The biomarker is an endpoint, because the biomarker reflect the type of obesity, namely
metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) or metabolic abnormal obesity (MAO) group. So with the use of
metabolites one distinguish MHO and MAO.

 Also an exposure and susceptibility marker

3. Are the metabolomics measurements performed targeted or untargeted? Explain the difference.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches?

Both a targeted and untargeted analysis was employed in this study.

Target measurement = used to estimate the importance of each metabolite within a specific
pathway.
- Hypothesis driven
- The metabolites you want to investigate are already identified (specific)
- Aim = absolute quantification of specific metabolites in biological samples
- Limited number of metabolites

Advantages:
- Used when you want to investigate a specific metabolite

Disadvantages:
- Require a priori knowledge of metabolites of interest
- Do not achieve global coverage

Untargeted measurement = quantify the global metabolic profile of a sample
- Hypothesis-generation

, Practical I – Biomarkers: from single markers to omics


- Collect and analyse all detectable metabolites in a sample
- You do not know the identification of the metabolites
- Compare differences (peaks) in metabolic profiles across different (sub)populations
- As many metabolites as possible
- Relatively easy automated high-throughput

Advantages:
- Reveal novel compound and chemical unknowns
- Leading to new insights in disease mechanisms or treatment

Disadvantages:
- You do not know the identity of the metabolites

Library = database that contains information to identify metabolites

4. Was the sample collection, handling, storage and analysis suitable for measuring
(metabol)omics data? Why (not)? Which issues should be taken into account?

What should be mentioned in the method section:
- Sample collection = blood samples after 8 hours of fasting
o Not mentioned time between sample collection and endpoint
- Storage = stored at -80 degrees of Celsius
o Not mentioned timing etc.
- Extraction = at 40 degrees of Celsius

The sample collection, handling, storage and analysis seems suitable for measuring omics data,
however limited information is mentioned.

Issues to take into account:
- Transport
- Laboratory errors
- Storage effects
- Freeze-thaw cycles
- Batch effects

 You need a quality control sample

5. Did the authors use univariate and/or multivariate statistical methods for analyzing their data?
What are the differences and/or advantages of both approaches?

Therefore the author use univariate statistical methods, because there is only one outcome  MAO
= yes/no  logistic regression

However, it is a multivariate methods, because they are looking at all the metabolites together
- PLSDA
- Principal component analysis
- Repeated measures ANOVA
 Complex data driven explorative

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller zoeverschueren. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.08. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75323 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.08
  • (0)
  Add to cart