1. Explain the Kalam Argument from temporal causation
2. Outline Aquinas’ 1st way
3. Explain Aquinas’ cosmological argument from a first cause
4. Explain Descartes’ cosmological argument
5. Outline Aquinas’ cosmological argument from contingency
6. Explain Leibniz’s cosmological argument based on the principle of sufficient reason
7. Explain Hume’s objection to the causal principle
8. Describe the fallacy of composition and explain how Russell criticizes Aquinas’ 3rd way with
reference to it
9. Outline the criticism against all cosmological arguments from contingency that a necessary being
is impossible
10. How does the possibility of an infinite series apply as a criticism against the Kalam Argument?
1. All cosmological arguments essentially claim that the existence of the
universe must have had a beginning, and they conclude that the cause
must have been God. The Kalam Argument begins by pointing out that all
phenomena in the universe are temporal- they precede and follow other
phenomena. The main point of the argument is the claim that an infinite
regress of temporal phenomena would be impossible. To back up this
claim, there are a number of paradoxes of infinity that could be regarded,
for example, the infinite hotel thought experiment. Since an infinite regress
is impossible, there must have been a beginning of the universe and
something that caused it. Since such a cause would have to be timeless
and immaterial, it must have been God. The conclusion then, is that God
exists.
2. Aquinas’ first way is his temporal cosmological argument, arguing for
God’s existence as the cause of the universe. He regards a first ‘mover’
but what he means by motion is actually change. He is referring to a
change from that which is potential to that which is actual. He states that
every mover must have been moved by something and only actual motion
can convert a potential motion to be actual also. If no mover exists then
there cannot be any succeeding motion. In order for there to be a chain of
movers and motion, there must have been a first mover since such a
sequence could not be limitless. In other words there cannot be an infinite
series of motion. Also, nothing is capable of moving itself. So there must
be an unmoved first mover, namely God. Hence, God exists.
3. Aquinas’ argument from a first cause is his atemporal form of
cosmological argument. He refers to causes, which are meant to sustain
their effects such as gravity would sustain orbits. Since we perceive a
series of causes and effects, and nothing can actually cause itself to exist,
there must be a cause at the start of the series. Without any causes there
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller tiawhymark. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.15. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.