100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
LAWS08130 Succession and Trust Law Tutorial 4-trusts $7.99   Add to cart

Other

LAWS08130 Succession and Trust Law Tutorial 4-trusts

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

LAWS08130 Succession and Trust Law Tutorial 4-trusts

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • December 26, 2022
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Other
  • Unknown
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Tutorial 4- trusts

Trust- ownership and management function is with the trustees- they make decisions of investment-
set of beneficiaries who enjoy the value of the trust patrimony- risk of trustees serving their own
interest- rules of trust law devised to avoid these problems e.g. avoid agency problems

1. a) 2 types of objections- objection to grant the lease itself- is this the type of act where the
trust has the power to make the decision- look at the trust deed, which could set out the
powers of the trustees- where the trust is silent then look at s4 of Trust (S) Act 1921- default
powers which can be countered by express provisions in the deed- the law allows them to
grant a lease- s4(1)(c)- decisions can be made- and second the execution of the lease i.e.
grant the lease- is the decision valid- requirements to make a valid decision- the decision has
to be made by a quorum i.e. by majority who are in existence not just the presence at the
meeting- so here 3/5- they need to consult all trustees (Yires case?)- thus 4 trustees need to
be consulted as Ursula died and which automatically removes the trustees- object on
consultation as Tony has not been consulted- the effect of this renders the decision invalid-
though he cannot be reached – so the rule would be waived (malcom v goldie) thus we
probably do not need to be consult Tony and all other trustees have been consulted- thus
consultation requirement is probably met- move to majority vote- 2 trustees agree to the
decision- potentially we have 4 trustees at the moment- Tony is still a trustee- thus 2 people
voting for the decision is not a majority- though we don’t know if Susan has resigned- if her
resignation is valid then we have 3 trustees and this would mean that we hav a quorum- So
the validity of the decision turns to the validity of Susan’s resignation- thus her resignation is
probably not valid- section 3(2) of the 1921 Act as she is a remunerated trustee and thus
cannot resign other than when the court lets them- even if we ignore s3(2) we have an issue
of whether the method of resignation (various ways in which a trustee can resign- specific
forms of writing section 19 of the 1921 Act- but this is not the only method due to the word
‘may resign’- some formality and signature is seemingly needed - rafique case- thus here
even she was not a remunerated trustee her method of resignation is not valid- probably
cannot verbally resign and there is no signature- the effect of her invalid resignation is that
we have 4 trustees and thus we don’t have a quorum and they cannot thus make a decision
as to the lease. Who needs to sign in order for the trust to execute a deed? Perhaps a
majority of them Harrold Engineering case- at common law it is sufficient for the majority of
the trustees to sign but they court above expressed disagreement to this but their
comments were obiter- section 7 of the 1921 Act allows majority in some circumstances as
well- but this section would not apply in this case as he is a beneficiary of the trust and this
section does not apply to beneficiaries- and thus we fall back on common law and having
said that Susan;’s resignation is not valid would mean that we also don’t have a majority
here.
b) section 4 (1) (g)- go to court- section 3(2) applies so we need to go to court to have her
removed as she is a remunerated trustee- this would lead to the decision becoming valid ot
grant the lease as we have a majority- also section 23 allows application to the court to
remove Tony if he was out of the UK for more than 6 months, which would lead to us having
3 trustees and thus we get a majority.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller UpperCrust. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart