100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
cognitive neuroscience week 1 summary $3.26   Add to cart

Summary

cognitive neuroscience week 1 summary

 42 views  2 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

howdyy, this summary is only week 1 (so chapter 1 & 3) of the Cognitive neuroscience - the biology of the mind by gazzaniga, ivry and mangun fifth edition :) also this may look like a lot - but its also typed in the cornell note taking style so it takes a more space than regular note taking! ...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

  • No
  • Chapter 1 & 3 (week 1 content)
  • January 16, 2023
  • 17
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
avatar-seller
A brief history :ch1

Willis Created drawings of the human brain that remained the most accurate representations for
200 years

Coined names for numerous brain regions

Set motion the ideas and knowledge base for cognitive neuroscience

Foreshadowed the notion that isolated brain damage (bio) could affect behaviour (psy)

name : cog neuro 1970’s by george a miller

Cognition - process of knowing (what arises from awareness, perception and reasoning)

Neuroscience - study of how the nervous system is organised and functions

Explains how the function of physical brain can yield thoughts ideas and beliefs of a mind

How was brain build Trial and error

Current brains Found 100,000 y ago

Primate brain 34-23 million yearts ago (oligocene epoch)

Greeks Theoretical leap to the view that we are separate from the world we occupy

Thales (monism) Posts that the flesh and blood brain produce thought cognitive neuroscience

Descartes (dualsim) Mind could influence the body and vice versa (decided pineal gland was it)

Most of modern c&n Whether mind is enabled by whole brain working in concert vs. specialised parts of the brain
science working at least partly independently

Gall Convinced that brain was the organ of the mind that innate faculties were localised in
specific regions of the cerebral cortex

35 or more specific functions; from cognitive basics (language and colour perception) to
ephemeral capacities (affection and moral sense)

→ each supported by specific brain regions
(technically not a scientist → wouldn’t disprove theories)


Anatomical personology/ Through palpating the skull
phrenology (Gall & → read personality
Spurzheim)

Florens and animals Destroyed the brains of certain animals

Found that removing cerebral hemispheres → no perception, motor and judgement
Removing cerebellum → uncoordinated and lost their equilibrium

BUT, couldn't find areas for advanced abilities (memory/cognition)

Aggregate field theory Flourens’ notion

All sensations, all perceptions and all volitions occupy the same seat in these (cerebral)
organs

Faculty of sensation, percept and evolution is essentially one faculty

Localisation fell out of favour

Topographic organisations Map of body was represented across particular cortical area
in the cerebral cortex
(jackson)

Jackson Rare to lose a function completely → multiple regions of the brain contribute to a given
behaviour

,Tan & Borca B-b–b = barely speak (But understands)

Tan developed aphasia (could understand but could only say tan)

Found syphilitic lesion in left hemisphere inferior frontal lobe (aka broca's area) → specific
aspect of language

Wernicke W=V=vocal
Could talk but made little sense
Also couldn't understand spoken / written language

Found lesion in more posterior region of the left hemisphere




BOTH Focal brian damage causes specific behavioural deficits

Korbian Brodman Cortical maps (1909)

Used tissue stans → visualise different cell types in different brain regions

→ cytoarchitectonics Aka cellular architecture
How cells differ between different brain regions

Other scientists proved that these brain areas indeed represent functionally distinct brain
regions

Golgi Developed one the most famous cell stains
The Black reaction
→ impregnated individual neurons w silver chromate
Permits visualisation of entire neuron
Believed that whole brain was syncytium

→ syncytium Gogli believed whole brain was this:
Continuous mass of tissue that shares a common cytoplasm

Ramon y Cajal First to identify the unitary nature of neurons and to articulate what came to be known as the
neuron doctrine

→ neuron doctrine Concept that the nervous system is made of individual cells
Also recognised that transmission of electrical information went in only one direction:
Dendrites down → axonal tip

Purkinje Described first nerves cell in the nervous system in 1873

Herman von helmholtz Electrical current in the cell was not a by-product of the cellular activity, but rather the
medium that was actually carrying information along the axon of the nerve cell.
First to suggest that invertebrates would be good models for studying vertebrate brain
mechanisms.

Synapse Junction between two neurons

Mind scientifically Knowledge of the parts (neurons and brian parts) must be understood in conjunction with
the whole (what the parts make when they come together; mind)

Experimental psych born Studying the mind by measuring behaviour

Rationalism Held that all knowledge could be gained through the use of reason alone
Truth was intellectual, no sensory
By thinking determine true beliefs ad reject beliefs were unsupportable
Replaced religion
(descartes, spinoza and leibniz)

=/= as logical thinking

Logic Relies on inductive reasoning, stats, probabilities

, Empiricism Idea that all knowledge comes from sensory experience
Blank slate
Direct sensory experience produces simple ideas and concepts
When simple ideas interact and become associated with another, complex ideas/concepts
created in the knowledge system

Psychological Believed that aggregate of a person’s experience determined the course of mental
Associationists development

Associationism Complex processes like memory could be measured and analysed
(ebbinghaus) Ebbinghaus one of the first to understand that mental processes that are internal could be
measured
Became psychological explanation for behaviour

Thorndike Response that followed a reward would be stamped into the organism as a habitual
response
Rewards = mechanism for establishing more adaptive response

Behaviourism (Watson) Psychology could be objective only if it is based on observable behaviour
Learning was the key to everything


Sensory information is Data on which preexisting mental structures act
merely

Montreal procedure Treating epilepsy
Surgically destroyed the seizure causing neurons
To find these neurons → simulated various parts w electrical probes and observed the
awake patient
From observations create maps of sensory and motor cortices of the brain

Hebb Cells that fire together, wire together
Brain active all the time

Miller Brain also is an information processor and breaking the bonds of behaviourism
→ cognitive revolution

Chomsky Sequential predictability follows from adherence to grammatical not probabilistic rules
→ associationism couldn't explain how children learned language



Inslata mista Cognitive neuroscience is a mixed salad of different disciplines

INSTRUMENTS OF
NEUROSCIENCE

Driving force of brain’s Electrical impulses, fluctuations in blood flow, shifts in utilisation of oxygen and glucose are
business the driving forces of the brain’s business

→ also parameters that are measured and analysed in various methods used to study how
mental activities are supposed by brain functions

Electroencephalography Noninvasive brain study
Electrical activity - but photographic recording

Blood flow Mosso: Recorded pulsations as blood flowed around & thur the cortex, increased locally =
inferred that blood follows function

Fulton: blood flow to the visual cortex varied w the attention paid to surrounding objects

Kety. could perfuse arterial blood w inert gas such as nitrous oxide, then gas would circulate
thru the brain and be absorbed independently of the brain’s metabolic activity (depending on
diffusion, solubility and perfusion)
→ more drastic measures




Vallebona: tomographic Technique in which a series of transverse sections are taken
radiography

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller navy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.26. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75759 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$3.26  2x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart