100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
WJEC Criminology Unit 3 Model Answers AC3.2 $4.67   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

WJEC Criminology Unit 3 Model Answers AC3.2

 258 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

If you are taking the unit 3 controlled assessment, these are the exact model answers I used which got me an A grade. These are well developed answers, without links to the brief (as that is relevant to your exam).

Preview 2 out of 9  pages

  • February 27, 2023
  • 9
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
AC3.2 Draw conclusions from information


JUST VERDICTS


 A just verdict is one that is deserved, lawful and proper. It is a verdict that does

justice to the facts of the case, finding the guilty, guilty and the innocent not guilty.



 For example, Colin Pitchfork murdered and raped 2 women but at the time not

enough evidence to take him to court. However, the development of DNA analysis

meant that eventually, they were able to use the analysis to be able to get a

conviction. Following DNA analysis, they found that his DNA was all over the victim's

body and clothing which makes the evidence irrefutable. This was a just verdict.



 However, sometimes there isn’t a just verdict. In the case of Stephen Lawrence,

when the police began investigating Lawrence’s case, they didn’t collect sufficient

evidence for the jury to believe that Gary Dobson and David Norris were guilty. They

were acquitted in the original trial. Very shortly after this, new evidence came to life

which was enough to be able to convict Dobson and Norris but that could not

happen due to the double jeopardy rule. Institutional racism led to a non-effective

investigation to convict in the original trial. Dobson and Norris had been free for 10

years before the double jeopardy law was abolished (2002) and only after that they

appeared in court once more for the murder of Lawrence. Hence, there was not a

just verdict produced by the court.

,  Similar in Billy Dunlop’s case it went all the way through to the end and he was found

non-guilty. He knew about the double jeopardy rule and had confessed after the

trial, that he murdered Julie Hogg, hence, he could not go to trial. Anne Ming (Hogg’s

mother) campaigned for the abolishment of the double jeopardy rule. Following the

removal of the double jeopardy law after a successful campaign, Dunlop was then

convicted but the initial verdict was not just.



 In other cases, Jury Equity may produce a just verdict. Jury equity is when an

individual is clearly of an offense, but the jury decides a person should be not guilty

due to the circumstances in which they committed the crime. For example, Alan

Blythe was convicted of possessing and supplying marijuana. He was caught

distributing marijuana and in court used the defence of ‘duress of circumstances’

claiming that he only done so for his wife who was terminally ill with cerebral palsy,

and it was the only thing that relieved her pain. Juries sometimes do this when they

believe the existing law, or the punishment is unfair.



 The jury can also produce a just verdict when there is jury nullification which is when

someone is clearly guilty, but the jury decides they are non-guilty due to their bias

towards the individual. An example of this is in the case of the Ku Klux Klan. In the US

there have been cases of all white members refusing to convict members of the Ku

Klux Klan.


SAFE VERDICTS

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller woah2807. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.67. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82871 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.67
  • (0)
  Add to cart