o Art. 102: abuse by undertaking with dominant position
o Entity engaging in economic activity (undertaking)? No, then not applicable
o Dominance definition [position of economic strength that allows the
undertaking to behave independently from its competitor] P.
48 (Hoffman la Roche / united brands). DOMINANCE ITSELF NOT ILLEGAL
Assessment of dominance (Michelin)
Distribution network
Technical knowledge
Extent of its products
Temporary losses (irrelevant)
Market share (not conclusive)
< 40%: no dominance
= 40%: depends on shares of competitors
o Small competitors, likely dominance
o Moderate market share competitors (25%), less likely
> 40%: depends on circumstances (Michelin)
o Abuse definition [conduct carried out by dominant undertaking that distorts
competition] P. 48 (hoffmann la roche)
Type of abuse
Exploitative (excessive prices/inferior quality)
o (AKKA/LAA) legal test, difference rates must be:
Significant
Persistent (to be regarded as appreciable)
Exclusionary (competitors upstream or downstream are
excluded from market due to conduct dominant undertaking)
o Refusal to supply (Oscar Bronner) illegal if (all
conditions have to be met!!!!:
Refusal likely eliminates all competition in
market
No objective justification for refusal
Service/good indispensable for rejected
company
Lack of alternatives
o Anticompetitive effect of dominant position must affect trade between MS (if
not, then national competition law applies, or else EU competition law
applies) p. 519 + Commission Notice (p. 179 case law pack)
Presumption: if market share of parties > 5% then cross-border effect
o Abuse of dominance objectively justified under efficiency grounds? P. 539.
Same logic of 101(3), but no legal provision
Undertaking can argue that abusive conduct is necessary for efficiency
and good for consumers Conduct is objectively necessary or that
abusive conduct is counterbalanced by objective economic
justifications - advantages in terms of efficiency that also benefit
consumers (technical and commercial grounds).
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fleurdonders. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $6.32. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.