Klinisch Redeneren en Evidence Based Practice 2 (2500KE2_22)
Case
Case study Klinisch Redeneren (psycho)geriatrie jaar 2 - dementie
41 views 4 purchases
Course
Klinisch Redeneren en Evidence Based Practice 2 (2500KE2_22)
Institution
Hogeschool Van Amsterdam (HvA)
Het onderwerp van deze case study is het onderzoeken wat de beste verpleegkundige interventie is bij thuiswonende ouderen met dementie en somberheid. Voor deze case study heb ik een 7,9 behaald.
Klinisch Redeneren en Evidence Based Practice 2 (2500KE2_22)
All documents for this subject (14)
Seller
Follow
jennyboorsma
Content preview
Case study: dementie en somberheid
Wat is de meest geschikte verpleegkundige interventie bij ouderen met dementie om somberheid te
verminderen?
Naam student:
Studentnummer:
Groep:
Naam examinator:
Naam studieonderdeel: Klinisch redeneren (Psycho)Geriatrie
Studiegidsnummer:
Datum van inleveren:
Aantal woorden: 2994
, Inhoud
1. Inleiding..........................................................................................................................................
Casus...................................................................................................................................................
2. Gevalsbeschrijving..........................................................................................................................
2.1. Voorgeschiedenis.........................................................................................................................
2.2. (Psycho)pathologie, pathofysiologie en beloop...........................................................................
2.3. Gevolgen voor het functioneren en dagelijks leven o.b.v. het ICF-model....................................
2.4. Verpleegkundig diagnosen...........................................................................................................
2.5. Betrokken disciplines...................................................................................................................
3. Gezondheidsprobleem....................................................................................................................
4. Methoden.......................................................................................................................................
4.1. Geraadpleegde databases............................................................................................................
4.2. Searchstring.................................................................................................................................
4.3. In- en exclusiecriteria...................................................................................................................
5. Verdieping.......................................................................................................................................
5.1. Opbrengst literatuurstudie..........................................................................................................
5.2. Prognostische variabelen, prognose van het gezondheidsprobleem...........................................
5.3. Hypothetische verpleegkundige interventies..............................................................................
6. Bespreking......................................................................................................................................
6.1. Uitwerking klinische redenering..................................................................................................
6.1.1. Effecten, bewijs, aangrijpingspunt, werkingsmechanisme, haalbaarheid en
aanvaardbaarheid per interventie..................................................................................................
7. Discussie, conclusie en aanbevelingen..........................................................................................
7.1. Discussie....................................................................................................................................
7.1.1. Rol van de verpleegkundige....................................................................................................
7.1.2. Sterke en zwakke punten case study......................................................................................
7.2. Conclusie....................................................................................................................................
7.3. Aanbevelingen...........................................................................................................................
8. Bronnenoverzicht..........................................................................................................................
2
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jennyboorsma. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.52. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
