Statutory harassment:
- Harassment related to a protected characteristic (EA 2010, s.26)
○ A person (A) harasses another (B) if
▪ A engages in unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic and
▪ The conduct has the purpose or effect of
□ Violating B's dignity or
□ Creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive
environment for B
'Related to' - Kettle v Ward [2006]
◊ Cleaner and manager did not get along - manager (male)
thought that the cleaner (female) was bunking off of work by
staying in the women's toilets
◊ Manager burst in and accused her of bunking off work - she told
him that he shouldn’t be in the women's toilets and he said that
he could go wherever he wanted - cleaner brought a claim of
harassment and lost
◊ Conduct was not because of sex
'Related to' - Third party harassment - Coleman v Attridge Law Case
C-303/06
◊ Woman returning to work after giving birth to a severely
disabled baby was harassed at work regarding her baby's
condition
◊ Brought a claim relating to harassment because of disability and
she won
'Related to' - Perceived harassment
'Related to' - Where nobody's protected ground was involved - English
v Sanderson Blinds [2009] ICR 543 (CA); Lee v Ashers Bakery [2018]
UKSC 49
'Conduct' - any type of conduct, verbal, emails, phone calls etc
'Purpose or effect' - Richmond Pharmacology v Dhaliwal (2009):
◊ 'a respondent may be held liable on the basis that the effect of
his conduct has been to produce proscribed consequences
[violating dignity or hostile environment] even if that was not
his purpose; and, conversely, that he may be liable if he acted
for the purposes of producing the proscribed consequences but
did not in fact do so…'
'Purpose or effect' - Sheffield CC v Norouzi (2011)
◊ Norouzi was of Iranian origin and co-workers made fun of his
accent intending to create banter
◊ In reality they were upsetting and violating Norouzi
◊ Though the purpose was not harmful there was an effect so
there could be liability
'Violating B's dignity or creating a hostile environment'
Assessing the effect of the conduct - s.26(4) EA 2010; 'In deciding
whether conduct has the effect [violation of dignity or hostile
environment] each of the following must be taken into account:
◊ The perception of B
◊ The other circumstances of the case
◊ Whether it is reasonable for the conduct to have that effect
- Sexual harassment (EA 2010, s.26(2))
○ A person harasses another if
▪ A engages in unwanted conduct of a sexual conduct and
Equality Law Page 1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller charlie01jones. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.30. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.