100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Theft - Criminal law OCR $4.57   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Theft - Criminal law OCR

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of theft for OCR, written by an A* student

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • June 7, 2023
  • 5
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
avatar-seller
S.1 theft act 1968:
s.1(1) “a person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property
belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of
it.”
s.1(2) “it is immaterial whether the appropriation is to make a gain or is made
for the thief’s own benefit.”
AR: appropriation of property belonging to another.
MR: dishonesty and with the intention of permanently depriving them.
(elements are s.2 and s.6)
S.2 - dishonesty (part of MR): no definition of dishonesty, it will either be
obvious from the evidence, the Ivey test from Ivey v Genting Casinos will be
applied, or s.2(1)(a), (b), or (c) may apply. Ivey v Genting casinos - 1. What
was the actual state of D’s knowledge and belief as to facts? 2. In the context
of (a), was D’s conduct dishonest according to the ordinary standards of a
reasonable and honest person. *This case modified the Ghosh test for
dishonesty and was confirmed by Barton and Booth (2020). s.2(1) theft act
says: 1. s.2(1)(a) - D believes they had a right in law to deprive on behalf of self
or 3rd person - Robinson. s.2(1)(b) - D believes the other person would
consented if they knew the circumstances - Holden. s.2(1)(c) - D believes the
person the property belongs to could not be discovered by taking reasonable
steps - Small. D’s belief only needs to be genuine, not reasonable - Holden.
s.2(2) - a person’s appropriation of property belonging to another may be
dishonest notwithstanding that he is willing to pay for the property.
S.3 - appropriates (part of AR): s.3(1) any assumption by a person of the rights
of an owner amounts to an appropriation. Appropriation may be damaging,
possessing, consuming, selling, lending, changing or using the property.

, Morris; Rule 1 - any assumption of the rights of the owner is enough to be
appropriated (only need one right to be assumed). Rule 2 - price switching is
an appropriation. Pitham and Hehl; property does not have to be taken to be
an appropriation. Lawrence; there can be an appropriation even with the
consent of the owner. Hinks; even when there’s no deception in obtaining the
consent of the owner and it’s a valid gift, this can be an appropriation of
property. Later appropriations - s.3(1) appropriation can occur after the
taking, if you later assume the right to something. Theft is complete at the
moment of appropriation.
S.4 - property (part of AR): issues with defining property; e.g. is sunlight
property, are body parts property, is information property. Generally,
property is something with monetary value. s.4(1) - money, real or personal
property, things in action and other intangible property. Types: money (notes
& coins), real property (lands & buildings), personal property (anything
moveable, big or small), things in action (have no physical presence but are
rights which can be enforced against another person in law e.g. bank
accounts, cheques, shares), other intangible property (no physical presence
e.g. export, quota, patent). s.4(3) - mushrooms, flowers or fruits growing wild
are not property unless it’s done for reward, sale or other commercial
purpose. Wild creatures taken from an estate are not theft, however an animal
taken from a zoo is theft as it is “ordinarily kept in captivity.” Oxford v Moss
- information isn’t property. Kelly and Lindsay - body parts aren’t property,
unless they have acquired different attributes due to the application of skill or
preservation techniques.
S.5 - belonging to another (part of AR): property belongs to whoever has
possession or control or a proprietary right or interest in the property. Turner

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller scarlettbuckle. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.57. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62555 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.57
  • (0)
  Add to cart