100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A summary of historians and their quotes for Russian History A-level $3.79
Add to cart

Summary

A summary of historians and their quotes for Russian History A-level

 14 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

A summary of historians and their quotes for Russian History A-level covering the rules of Alexander II, Alexander III, Nicholas II, Lenin, Stalin and Khrushchev.

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • June 19, 2023
  • 5
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Historians and quotes
E.H Carr
Soft on communism, admirer of Lenin and apologist for Stalin.

Seen as “soviet sympathiser “, and for accepting soviet sources and information at “face value”.


Robert Conquest -Liberal-conservative, anti-communist
He was viewed as anti-Soviet. Argued Marxism was a flawed ideology based on misleading
assumptions and that the October revolution was a coup d'état without widespread popular
support, and that soviet communism had totalitarianism at its core from the outside. – rejected
argument that Stalin deviated from Lenin’s legacy.




Orlando Figes -Liberal revisionist
Critical of Lenin, saying he led the groundwork for Stalinist totalitarianism, repression and genocide.
Tends to view revolutionary groups and parties as chaotic collectives of individuals, rather than
genuine mass movements.


Sheila Fitzpatrick – social revisionist
Thought October revolution more coup d'état than popular revolution.
Believed impetus for socialist revolution came from Lenin and his singlemindedness.


Christopher Hill – Marxist
Singles Lenin’s praises but also adapts a Stalinist perspective, criticising Trotsky while failing to
provide an accurate account of how Stalin manipulated his way into power.


Richard Pipes- western liberal-conservative
Negative towards communism, October evolution, Lenin and Bolsheviks.
Depicts Lenin as a usurper, political thief, who waited until the provisional government was at its
weakest then snatched its power illegitimately and without a broad supporter base.
Believed violence, terror inevitable in post 1917 Russia, partly due to socialism but mostly because
of Lenin and his followers.
Promotes Kornilov as leader (overlooks his own brutal links and antisemitic background).

, John Reed – socialist
-worked for left-wing magazine

-was in Russia just after Kornilov affair, at a time when the provisional government was in last
throes and a Bolshevik rev. predicted.
-sympathetic to Bolsheviks, and portrays Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoviev in favourable light.
- Reed’s book published in 1919 with a foreword included from Lenin, and Stalin later banned this
book, as heaped praise on Trotsky but didn’t mention him once.


Robert Service – Liberal
-post-revisionist and liberal.

-strongly critical of Lenin and other Bolshevik leaders, particularly the way they handled change and
crisis in post -1917.
- condemns the ideology of Marxism, that evolved into a “political religion.”


Dmitri Volkogonov- Soviet-revisionist or “soviet-liberal”

Son of a soviet official, part of the red army.
A typical hardliner, loyal to military, to soviet socialism and the state.


Preserving the autocracy

Topic Historian Quote
Tsars Figes In the mind of the ordinary peasant, the Tsar was not just a kingly ruler but a
god on earth.
Literacy Figes Literacy had a profound effect on the peasant mind and community. It
promotes abstract thought and enables the peasant to master new skills and
technologies.
Society Hill The revolution was made against the autocracy of the tsars, a type of
and government which we in England have not known since the 17th century.
autocracy There had been special reasons for the survival of such a regime in Russia. The
country was always too large and its communications too bad for it to be
efficiently administered from a single centre. Yet military defence in that
country of open flat plains demanded a highly centralised government under a
single leader, and the autocracy subsequently survived to give some
uniformity of administration for the medley of backward and illiterate peoples
who composed the vast empire.”
Economy Hill We can ask ourselves why Russia’s development was so delayed. The main
reason is that she failed to produce an independent middle class.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller shipovich05y. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.79. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

50990 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$3.79
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added