100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Microeconomics 1 Block 3 Market Failures Lecture Notes 20/21 $11.64   Add to cart

Class notes

Microeconomics 1 Block 3 Market Failures Lecture Notes 20/21

 2 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Microeconomics 1 Block 3 Market Failures Lecture Notes 20/21

Preview 3 out of 26  pages

  • June 19, 2023
  • 26
  • 2020/2021
  • Class notes
  • Peter wagner, dominic spengler
  • All classes
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
Micro Block 3: Market Failures

3.1 Monopoly

De nition

A market is a monopoly when there is a single rm o ering the good. Thus, the rm is facing the
full market demand, and consequently can easily manipulate the market price by changing its
output level.

Origins of monopolies

Whenever the total cost of producing any amount of output y is minimal when production is done
by one rm instead of several, we say that this rm is a natural monopoly. Natural monopolies
often occur in network industries.

Monopolies may occur due to control of a rare resource, input or patent; in this case, the rm can
be the only one to produce the good. Furthermore, the government can grant a rm monopoly
position on the market; often, post services are an institutional monopoly. Finally, predatory
behaviour can lead to monopolies as a rm can prevent other rms from entering the market by
using aggressive pricing strategies (e.g. selling at a very low price for some time, even if it means
incurring losses). It could also be the case that a few rms decide to collude and e ectively
behave as a monopoly.

Demand and inverse demand

The market (or aggregate) demand D(p) for some good is simply the sum of all individual demands
for that good. The amount y of good that can be sold on the market is therefore y = D(p). Recall
that we can invert the demand function to get the inverse demand function denote p(y). The
inverse demand function de nes the maximum price at which y units of a good can be sold.

Revenue function

The revenue function of the monopoly rm is denote r(y) = p(y)y. It de nes the revenue of the
monopoly for producing y units of a good, which can be sold at price p(y). Note that in perfect
competition revenue would be py, because p is given (the rm would be a price taker); in the
monopoly case, the rm can alter the market price by adjusting output.
1


fi fi fi fi fifi fifi fffi fi fi fi fifi ff fi

, Marginal revenue function

The marginal revenue function, MR(y) = r(y)/ y de nes the additional revenue the rm gets from
selling one additional unit of output. Marginal revenue can also be de ned by MR(y) = p(y) + [ p(y)/
y]y. Whenever the monopoly decides to increase its output by one unit, it has two e ects on the
revenue: selling one more unit of output gets the rm p(y), and also pushes the price down on all
the units it is selling.

Pro t maximisation

The monopoly’s pro t maximisation problem can be written maxy p(y)y - c(y) where c(y) is the total
cost function. The rst order condition for this problem is simply r(y)/ y - c(y)/ y = 0. This implies
that at the optimal choice of output y*, the marginal revenue should be equal to the marginal cost,
that is MR(y*) = MC(y*).




Figure 39: pro t maximisation

Note: In this gure, we show the optimal output choice for a monopoly with the cost curve c(y) = F
+ y + βy2 and facing the inverse demand pD = a - by. We chose F = 1, = 1, β = 0.5, a = 10 and b
= 1.

EXAMPLE The optimality condition MR = MC makes sense. Suppose the monopoly is choosing
to produce y units of output. Suppose that for this level of output, MR = 5 and MC = 4, so MR >
MC. Can y be pro t maximising? No. We see that if the monopoly was selling one more unit of
output, it would get £5 extra of revenue, and would have to pay only £4 to produce this extra unit.
Thus the pro t would increase, and so y cannot possibly pro t maximising. With this example, we
see that at the pro t maximising level of output, it must be that MR = MC. Graphically, we can
represent the optimal output choice of the monopoly as in gure 40.

EXAMPLE Consider the example from gure 40. The cost function is c(y) = 1 + y + 0.5y2, hence
the marginal cost MC(y) = 1 + y. The demand function is D(p) = 10 - p, from which we conclude
that the inverse demand function is p(y) = 10 - y. The revenue is thus r(y) = 10y - y2 and so the
marginal revenue is MR(y) = 10 - 2y. We know that the monopoly is choosing output such that
MR(y) = MC(y), that is 10 - 2y = 1 + y. Thus, the monopoly choose the optimal quantity of output
y* = 3, which he can sell for p* = 7.




2


𝝏 𝛼 fi fi fi fifififi fi𝝏 𝝏 fi fi fi 𝝏 fi𝝏 𝛼 𝝏 𝝏 fi ff 𝝏

, Figure 40: the monopolist behaviour

Note: In this gure, we show the optimal output choice for a monopoly with the cost curve c(y) = F
+ y + βy2 and facing the inverse demand pD = a - by. We chose F = 1, = 1, β = 0.5, a = 10 and b
= 1.

Marginal revenue and elasticity

The marginal revenue is MR(y) = p(y) + [ p(y)/ y]y = p(y)(1 + [y/p(y)][ p(y)/ y]). After some algebra,
we get that MR(y) = p(y)[1 + 1/ (y)] where (y) is the own-price elasticity of demand (y) = [ D(p)/ p]
[p/D(p)]. The own-price elasticity of demand measures the percentage change in demand after a
percentage change in the price of the good.

Usually, the own-price elasticity of demand is negative (since when the price increases, usually
demand decreases). Thus, we have (y) > 0. In addition, the monopoly won’t operate at output
levels where demand is too inelastic, i.e. when 0 > (y) > -1. The reason is that in this case, for
some level of output, the marginal revenue is negative, meaning that the rm can increase its
revenue by decreasing output. Since reducing output also decreases the cost, the rm will
increase its pro t. Thus, that level of output could not be optimal.

The optimal choice of output y* satis es p(y*)[1 + 1/ (y*)] = MC(y*). This is another way of writing
the MC = MR optimality condition. Rearranging the terms, we get p(y*) = [MC(y*)] / [1 + 1/ (y*)].
The optimal pricing strategy of the monopoly is to charge a markup over the marginal cost
(remember: (y) < -1).

Consider the example from gure 40. We saw that the monopoly will choose y* = 3 and sell at a
price p* = 7. Lets just check that the price it chose is consistent with the formulae above. The
elasticity of demand at y* is = -7/3. The marginal cost at y* is MC(y*) = 1 + 3 = 4. According to


3


𝛼

𝜖fi fi fi𝜖 𝜖 𝜖fi 𝝏 𝜖 𝝏 𝜖𝜖 𝝏 𝛼𝝏 fi fi𝜖 𝝏𝜖 𝝏

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ursulamoore33. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.64. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67866 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


$11.64
  • (0)
  Add to cart