(Industrial Safety and Health Management 6e Ray Asfahl, David Rieske)
(Solution Manual all Chapters)
Chapter 1
1.1. Some standards are frequently cited because these standards cover (1)
areas in which industries are having difficulty complying, or (2) areas in
which enforcement agencies are giving a great deal of attention, or both.
1.2. Many aspects about the standards might be useful. The text emphasizes
the importance of the "why" behind the standards that do exist.
1.3. No. It is an unattainable goal. Such a strategy fails to recognize the need
for discrimination among hazards to be corrected.
1.4. (1) Hazards that are physically infeasible to correct.
(2) Hazards that are physically feasible, but are economically infeasible, to
correct.
(3) Hazards that are physically feasible and economically feasible to
correct.
1.5. (1) Causes other more serious hazards to be overlooked while reacting to
less serious ones.
(2) Deteriorates credibility with top management.
1.6. A safety hazard is acute, causes or threatens to cause injuries, and is
usually more obvious than a health hazard.
A health hazard is chronic, causes or threatens to cause illness in the long
run, and is usually more subtle than a safety hazard.
1.7. Some example safety hazards:
unguarded belts, pulleys, gears, saws, and punch presses; fires;
explosions; open platforms; defective ladders; welding near open
flammable or combustible materials; overloaded or defective
cranes, hoists, or slings; ungrounded electrical equipment; exposed
live electrical conductors.
Some example health hazards:
coal dust, cotton dust, chronic loud noise, welding fumes, asbestos,
vinyl chloride, lead fumes, mercury, manganese, cadmium.
1.8. Some valid examples are spray paint, coal dust, benzene, and carbon
disulfide.
1.9. Some valid examples are noise, welding, and radiation.
1.10. Health hazards are usually more subtle than safety hazards; the industrial
hygienist must look for "unseen" hazards.
1.11. Safety hazards may appear more grave, but there are probably many
health hazard-related illnesses and deaths which are not documented.
1.12. Work training, statistics, job placement, industrial relations.
1.13. A comprehensive safety and health program involves engineering, and
, placement of the function within the personnel department may restrict
authority too much.
1.14. This places the Safety and Health Manager in an adversarial position with
enforcement officials.
1.15. CPSC concentrates on the responsibility of the manufacturers of the
machines and equipment, whereas OSHA concentrates on the
responsibility of the employer who places the equipment into use in the
workplace.
1.16. (NSC) National Safety Council
1.17. ANSI (American National Standards Institute)
Prepares voluntary standards for occupational safety and health among
other types of standards. OSHA adopted many ANSI standards early on,
invoking its temporary right to promulgate "national consensus standards."
1.18. OSHA is concerned with hazardous exposures to workers, i.e. worker
safety and health.
EPA is concerned with hazardous exposures to the public, particularly as
these hazards affect the earth, water, and atmosphere.
Many safety and health hazards inside the plant and outside are the
same, or are caused by the same chemical agents or physical factors.
Thus a firm's compliance with both EPA and OSHA regulations are often
the responsibility of the same individual.
1.19. 1-800-35-NIOSH; the agency that responds is, obviously, NIOSH, the
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
1.20. Passage of The Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, which
created the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).
1.21. Prior to passage of the OSHA law occupational health seemed remote
and not of a great deal of concern. Plant nurses were concerned with first
aid and physical examinations. After OSHA, occupational disease
prevention rose in importance.
1.22 The Bhopal, India disaster in which the release of methyl isocyanate gas
killed 2500 civilians. This incident showed that dangerous working
conditions do not just impact the workers, but everyone around a facility.
1.23 Reductions in energy consumption, for example, can lower a firm’s bottom
line energy cost while decreasing its impact on the environment.
1.24 The four environmental issues addresses were global warming, green
engineering, petroleum conservation, and tobacco smoke.
1.25 Green engineering is focused on the reduction of carbon fuels, which in
turn directly impact global warming.
,1.26 Systems Safety is considered essential in airlines, aerospace, and
hospitals. These are industries in which the failure of a system can be
catastrophic.
1.27 Systems Safety recognizes the benefit of such life-cycle planning and
design, and the System Safety Society is one of the
, CHAPTER 2 SOLUTIONS TO END-OF-CHAPTER EXERCISES
2.1. The achievement of worker safety lies principally in the hands of the
workers themselves and their direct supervisors; thus it is principally a line
function. Safety and health managers, however, are staff positions.
2.2. Acting as a facilitator in assisting, motivating, and advising the line
function in achieving worker safety and health.
2.3. They too often are such emotional crusaders for the cause that they lose
their credibility and with it their eligibility to be considered a "manager."
2.4. That safety must be achieved by line personnel facilitated by the staff
function.
2.5. Go to top management to re-determine its level of commitment to safety
and health.
2.6. The workers compensation system is a state, not federal system. The
system is nearly 100 years old; the first workers compensation laws were
introduced into state legislatures in 1909.
2.7. The ostensible purpose is to protect the worker by providing statutory
compensation levels to be paid by the employer for various injuries that
may be incurred by the worker.
An ulterior feature is immunity from additional liability for the employer,
except where "gross negligence" can be proven.
2.8. Management contends that some risk is inescapable in any line of work.
Therefore, their answer to the question is no. The worker bears some of
the risk in return for his/her pay for the job.
2.9. The employer or the employer's insurance carrier.
2.10. An industrial safety consultant employed by an insurance company. The
consultant's objective is to keep claims low among clients of his insurance
company.
2.11. A standardized recordkeeping system for industrial safety established by
the National Safety Council and later superseded by OSHA's system of
recordkeeping.
2.12. Differences in recordkeeping requirements for OSHA and its predecessor
Z16.1 system. Also other variations in conditions, such as employment
levels and recession cycles.
2.13. The "lost workdays" method would not reveal some very serious
accidents, especially fatalities, that do not cause a loss of a workday.
2.14. One that is work related and requires medical treatment.
