XII. a. Recap
- Ontological category of property
o Properties = features of objects
o Properties = tropes (= particulars/token-level entities) ; properties =
universals/type-level entities
- Problem of universals: question of type-level of tropes
o Response: sets of exactly resembling tropes
o Problem: criterion for analysing resemblance risk collapsing tropes into
universals by relying on principle of identity
XII. b. Armstrong’s two-category ontology
- Question: nature of thing instantiating properties
- Relation between property of object & object intuition of object instantiating
own property (i.e., apple instantiating own redness)
- Problem: double counting object’s properties object including properties &
instantiating properties (i.e., intrinsically red apple instantiating own property of
being red)
- Properties + thin particular substantiating properties (pin cushion analogy) =
constituents of object
- Object remaining once abstraction of all properties thin particular
- Substance = thin particular instantiating properties (i.e., apple’s redness)
- Thin particular having ≠ properties differing numerically ≠ qualitatively from any
other thin particular
- Thin particular = particularising entity
- Two-category ontology necessitating accepting ‘states of affairs’ in virtue of
truthmaker principle (= all truths having truthmaker(s))
- Thin particular S1 instantiating property P1 need for ontological glue for
truthmaking of thin particular S1 instantiating property P1
- Something needed for welding substance & property together
o ≠ sole existence of S1 & P1
o ≠ instantiation relationship (establishing instantiation relationship as third
constituent still need for gluing S1, P1 & instantiation relationship
together problem of Bradlian regress)
State of affair ‘S1 instantiating P1’ welding S1 & P1 together
XII. c. Problems with thin particulars
- Question entity lacking properties ontologically dubious
o Thin particular having property of instantiating properties (?) difference
property/capability (?)
- Problem 1: impossibility distinguishing thin particulars from each other in absence
of defining properties question possibility of characterising nature of thin
particular
- Problem 2: thin particulars = bare lacking capabilities lacking necessary
capability of having properties
- Problem 3: thin particulars lacking properties counter-intuitively totally causally
immune
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller emmalmartinelli. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $8.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.