100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
WJEC Criminology Unit 3 AC3.2 controlled assesment answer. $5.17
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. WJEC
  4.  
  5. Criminology
  6.  
  7. Crime Scene to Courtroom

Other

WJEC Criminology Unit 3 AC3.2 controlled assesment answer.
 0 purchase
  • Course
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
  • Institution
  • WJEC

This is the write-up I used in my unit 3 controlled assessment for AC2.5. I got full marks overall. The example in the brief still needs to be added in either to replace one of these or as well as them. This can follow a similar structure to these as long as the question in the exam is fully answer...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

Document information

  • August 18, 2023
  • 4
  • 2023/2024
  • Other
  • Unknown

Subjects

  • wjec
  • criminology
  • unit 3
  • ac32
  • conclusions

Written for

  • A/AS Level
  • WJEC
  • Criminology
  • Crime Scene to Courtroom
All documents for this subject (388)

Seller

avatar-seller
rosie1245

Reviews received

Content preview

AC3.2

ADD BRIEF – may replace one of these


Miscarriage of justice – Derek Bentley

A conviction is called a miscarriage of justice if a defendant’s innocence is later proven; this is usually
due to new evidence.

Derek Bentley (19) and his friend Christopher Craig (16) were attempting an armed robbery when
the police were called. The policeman who arrived at the scene detained Bentley, but Craig started
shooting. Back-up arrived and more shooting began, the police officers shooting at Craig and him
shooting back, leading to one officer being shot in the head and dying. Later, both Craig and Bentley
were charged with murder, despite Bentley never carrying, or firing, a gun. Craig was given 10 years
in prison, as he was under 18. However, Bentley, who allegedly had a mental age of 11, was
sentenced to be hanged. His sentence was carried out on the 28 th of January 1953, after an appeal he
made was denied. In 1998 his conviction was ruled ‘unsafe’, and it was overturned.

In this case there was strong evidence showing that Derek and Christopher had intent to commit an
armed robbery as they were caught at a warehouse - Derek with a knife and knuckle duster and
Christopher with a knife and gun. This strongly suggests they were in the process of committing a
crime. There was also some controversy over whether Derek was under arrest at the time of the
shooting as this would have provided a defence. This is because the officer had detained him but
hadn’t formally told him he was under arrest. During the crime, police claimed that Derek said: ‘let
him have it, Chris’, which was used against Derek at trial. However, there is no evidence that this
was said and, even if it was, this could have multiple meanings, making it unreliable as evidence.
Strong evidence in Derek’s favour is that he never shot or even touched a gun during the event. A
psychiatrist also gave evidence that Derek was illiterate and had low intelligence.

This case can be considered as a miscarriage of justice as the only evidence against Derek was
showing he had taken part in an attempted armed robbery. There was no evidence of him
contributing to the shooting as he never actually held the gun. Some people argue that he was
implicated due to the ‘joint enterprise’ law, but it could also be argued that Derek had no intention
of harming anyone and did not resist arrest. If the crime took place today, diminished responsibility
could also be argued due to his low mental age. Overall, the evidence suggests that the conviction
and hanging of Derek Bentley was a miscarriage of justice as it shows he held little culpability for the
crime. It can be argued that the sentence itself was also miscarriage of justice, even if his conviction
was fair, seeing as his friend who started the shooting got only 10 years imprisonment.

One of the obvious negative consequences of this miscarriage of justice is that Derek Bentley lost his
life. This will have not only affected him, but also his family and others who knew him. Another
consequence, which could be seen as positive or negative, is that this case contributed to the
abolition of the death penalty.



Just verdicts – Shauna Hoare

A verdict is labelled ‘just’ if it is considered to be appropriate for the offence. However, an appeal is
still possible.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rosie1245. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $5.17. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67479 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling
$5.17
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added