100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Were the Peace Treaties of 1919-23 Fair? $10.49   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Were the Peace Treaties of 1919-23 Fair?

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

This provides an indepth glance at the peace treaties of 1919-23 internationally as handled by the League of Nations as well as the general peace treaties that were signed following World War One. This document is a summarisation of all that needs to be covered and provides sources as well as q...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 15  pages

  • October 19, 2023
  • 15
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary
  • Secondary school
  • 1
avatar-seller
Were the peace treaties of 1919-23 fair?
AIMS OF THE BIG THREE: WILSON’S VIEWPOINT

HIGH HOPES FOR PEACE:

The peacemakers in 1919 had an impossible job but there was great optimism at the time. One of the main reasons for these
high hopes was the American president Woodrow Wilson. In 1918 he had made a speech outlining his fourteen points, the
guidelines for a just and lasting peace treaty to end conflict.

WILSON’S IDEALIST IDEAS:

 Don’t be too harsh on Germany. Wilson believed that Germany should be punished but also believed harsh
judgement would push them to later seek revenge. He feared that communism would take over Germany might
exploit their resentment.
 Strengthen democracy in defeated countries. Wilson believed that Democracy was key to peace to Europe.
 Give self-determination to small countries that had once been part of the European empires. He wanted the
different peoples of Eastern Europe to rule themselves rather than be part of Austria-Hungary’s empire.
 International co-operation. Wilson also believed that nations should co-operate to achieve world peace. This
would be achieved through a ‘League of Nations’, Wilson’s most important of the fourteen points

SOURCE 1




A cartoon published in 1919 in an Australian newspaper

FOURTEEN POINTS: SUMMARY
 No secret treaties  Independence for Belgium
 Free access to the seas in peacetime or wartime  France to regain Alsace – Lorraine
 Free trade between countries  Frontier between Austria and Italy to be adjusted
 All countries to work towards disarmament  Self-determination for the peoples of Eastern Europe
 Colonies to have a say in their own future  Serbia to have access to the sea

 German troops to leave Russia  Self-determination for the people in the Turkish empire

 League of Nations to be set up.  Poland to become an independent state with access to the
sea



THE PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE, 1919-20:

, - The conference took place in VERSAILLES
- Lasted 12 months
- THIRTY-TWO NATIONS were supposed to be represented, but no one from the defeated nations were invited.
- Five treaties were drawn up at the conference. The main treaty being the TREATY OF VERSAILLES, which dealt
with Germany. The other treaties dealt with Germany’s allies.
- The important decisions were made by Clemenceau, Lloyd George and Wilson, who were referred to as ‘THE BIG
THREE’
- The Big Three were supported by a huge army of diplomats and expert advisers, but their advice was often ignored.

DID EVERYONE SHARE WILSON’S VIEWPOINT?

When Wilson talked about lasting peace and justice other leaders had to agree with him. However, many were doubtful
about Wilson’s ideas for achieving a just and lasting peace. An example of this was ‘SELF–DETERMINATION’: it
would be very difficult to give the people of Eastern Europe the opportunity to rule themselves because they were scattered
across many countries. Some people were bound to end up being ruled by people from another group with different customs
and languages.

DID LLOYD GEORGE AGREE WITH WILSON?

In private Lloyd George praised Wilson and his ideas. However, in private Lloyd George was less positive about Wilson’s
ideas. He complained to one of his officials that Wilson came to Paris LIKE A MISSIONARY to rescue the European
savages with his little sermons and lectures.

He agreed with Wilson with many issues, particularly that Germany should be punished but NOT TOO HARSHLY. He
did not want to trigger Germany into seeking revenge later and possibly start another war. Like Wilson he was deeply
concerned that a harsh treaty may lead to a COMMUNIST REVOLUTION like the one in Russia in 1917.

Selfishly he wanted to maintain Britain’s TRADE PARTNERSHIP with Germany. Before the war, Germany had been
Britain’s second largest trade partner. British people may not like it, but the fact was that trade with Germany meant jobs in
Britain.

However, unlike Wilson Lloyd George had the needs of the British Empire in mind. He wanted Germany to LOSE ITS
NAVY AND ITS COLONIES because they threatened the British Empire.

SOURCE 2 SOURCE 3

We want a peace which will be just, but not vindictive. If I am elected, Germany is going to pay... I have
We want a stern peace because the occasion demands it, personally no doubt we will get everything that you can
but the severity must be designed, not for vengeance, but squeeze out of a lemon, and a bit more. I propose that
for justice. Above all, we want to protect the future every bit of property, movable and immovable, in Allied
against a repetition of the horrors of this war. and neutral countries, whether State property or private
property, should be surrendered by the Germans.
Lloyd George speaking to the House of Commons before
the Peace Conference. Government minister, December 1918

PRESSURES ON LLOYD GEORGE

Lloyd George faced huge public pressures at home for a harsh treaty. People in Britain were not sympathetic to Germany in
any way. They had suffered over 1 MILLION casualties in the fighting, as well as food shortages and other hardships at
home. They had been fed anti – German propaganda for four years. They had also seen how Germany had treated Russia in
1918 when Russia surrendered. Under the Treaty of Brest – Litovsk Germany had stripped Russia of 25 % of its population
and huge areas of Russia’s best agricultural land.

Lloyd George had won the 1918 elections in Britain by promising to ‘make Germany pay’, even though he realised the
dangers of this course of action. So Lloyd George had to balance these pressures at home with his desire not to leave
Germany wanting revenge.

DID CLEMENCEAU AGREE WITH WILSON?

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller parachaghalia. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79223 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart