Class notes
Notes video lectures Literature Review (AM_1251)
- Course
- Institution
This document contains detailed notes from all the video lectures provided for the course Literature Review, which are also exam material.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
yaralangeveld
Reviews received
Content preview
Video lecture 1: Types of literature reviewLiterature review = a synthesis of knowledge in the form of a classification, comparison and/or
evaluation of the current knowledge → need to think critically about (a) forming an argument or
a critical analysis you can back up with evidence and appropriate examples, (b) strengths and
weaknesses of existing research, and (c) why and how ideas and theories might be improved.
→ involves: substantive findings, issues and themes -> populations, interventions, outcomes ->
theoretical contributions -> methodological contributions -> open questions (avenues for
further investigation) -> contradictions.
Critical approach = the review must compare and contrast existing views → holistic perspective
on the topic → more than just an annotated bibliography.
- Analysis: select, differentiate and break up → dissecting data into parts to determine the
relationship between them → instead of primary data you collect in interviews or focus
groups, the data you use is the text in the publication.
- Synthesis: integrate, combine, formulate, reorganise → rearranging elements derived
from analysis to identify relationships → like a puzzle, because putting together different
pieces of research from multiple sources to form a new story → goes farther than just
summarising, also criticising, comparing and contrasting multiple sources → important
to make your own contribution.
- Comprehension: understand, distinguish, explain outcome of synthesis → interpreting
and distinguishing between different types of data, theory and argument to describe the
substance of an idea → what are the themes that emerge and how do they relate? →
integrate existing knowledge and explain what has been written.
- Knowledge: define, classify, describe, name → describing principles, uses and function of
rules, methods and events.
There must be a need for the review → LR must contribute to the existing knowledge base →
common mistake is to search for a research gap → this is for primary research, but for LR
research gaps can be relevant findings.
→ LR can create a new dimension or fresh perspective by: (a) contributing to the research agenda
(what should be investigated and why?), (b) finding out what works and what doesn’t work, (c)
providing a taxonomy, typology or new ways to classify research findings, (d) proposing new
ways of thinking about topics addressed (alternative model/conceptual framework).
SALSA framework = Search (questioning and finding), AppraisaL (assessing for quality), Synthesis
(integrating, making sense of patterns), Analysis (breaking up, looking for patterns).
Two general kinds of topics:
1. Mature topics = large corpus → need for a review, critique and potential
reconceptualization → ambiguities, contradictions and gaps in the knowledge base.
2. New/emerging topics = small corpus → initial or preliminary conceptualisation (i.e. new
model, framework) → synthesis of the literature to date.
Types of LR:
Narrative review = undefined methods of searching, critiquing and synthesising literature →
broad aim (FEX. gain a broad understanding) → no well structure, but following leads → selection
of studies is purposive by reviewer → performed based on the reviewer’s opinion → no
methodological part is written.
Critical review = critical evaluate quality, results in hypothesis or model → identify most
significant items in the field.
, Integrative review = broadest type of review, includes experimental and non-experimental
research, may combine theoretical and empirical data → comprehensive search to identify
maximum primary sources → purposive sampling.
Mapping review = map and categorize existing literature to plan further reviews and/or
research by identifying gaps → determined by time/scope constraints.
Mixed methods = combination of review approaches → FEX. combining quantitative with
qualitative research → sensitive search or combining quantitative and qualitative strategies.
Overview = summary of literature that attempts to survey data and describe its characteristics
→ may include comprehensive searching.
Scoping review = assessment of potential size and scope of available research literature →
identify nature and extent of research evidence (usually including ongoing research) →
determined by time/scope constraints.
State-of-the art review = addresses more current matters, may offer new perspectives on issues
or point out areas for further research.
Systematic review = explicit, rigorous method of searching, critiquing and synthesising
literature → narrow focus, specific review focus → strict protocol to include as much studies in
the review as possible → follow predetermined criteria for including and excluding studies →
methodological part for transparency and reproductivity → key phases:
1. Mapping the field through a scoping review → what are knowledge gaps, preparing review
plan → method and protocol, defining questions and keywords, setting up inclusion and
exclusion criteria.
2. Comprehensive search → search using keywords and document search results in a table
→ maybe need to revise inclusion and exclusion criteria or research question.
3. Quality assessment → read the full paper and apply quality assessment, using the
hierarchy of research → decide which papers are in and out of the review.
4. Data extraction → write relevant data down in an extraction sheet.
5. Synthesis → synthesis data from individual articles into one.
6. Write up → balanced, impartial and comprehensive
report, using a format, while enabling other researchers to
replicate the review.
→ hierarchy of research (picture left) = hierarchy of study types
→ systematic review is at the top.
Meta-analysis = combines the results of quantitative studies →
comprehensive searching.
Key dimensions on which reviews differ: picture right →
- configurative = interpret and
understand a topic, arranging info and developing rather than applying
concepts → generate theory (seeking concepts).
- aggregative = collecting empirical data to describe and test definite
concepts, follow a logic, because they are adding up to make empirical
statements → test theory (seeking evidence to inform decision making).
Systematic review vs. systematic approach: systematic review follow strict
protocol → systematic approach = identify, critically appraise and synthesize
relevant studies to answer a predefined question → comprehensive searching
strategy, developing inclusion and exclusion criteria → critical appraisal to ensure that only high
quality papers are included → the findings of all the papers are then pulled together and
combined using a systematic approach.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller yaralangeveld. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.52. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
73918 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now