100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Private Acquisitions Revision Notes 2017 - Distinction $19.59   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Private Acquisitions Revision Notes 2017 - Distinction

20 reviews
 1675 views  54 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

I completed the LPC (Legal Practice Course) at BPP University in 2017 with a 90% distinction. hese detailed and condensed notes cover the entire Private Acquisitions module. I have covered every SGS and included a template of amended clauses in a Share Purchase Agreement. My friends at other univer...

[Show more]
Last document update: 6 year ago

Preview 2 out of 17  pages

  • December 27, 2017
  • December 27, 2017
  • 17
  • 2016/2017
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Unknown

20  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: kai_ali • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: dereksaf • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: triplechoc228 • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: heha73 • 4 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: komalali9 • 5 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: elizabethkostovaa • 5 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: spyrosspyrakos0 • 5 year ago

Show more reviews  
avatar-seller
AUCTION SALES • Seller:
o Best possible price
CONTRACTUAL CONSENTS: E.g. suppliers, lenders
DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998
o Committed Buyers, not fishing/leaking confidential info
SHARE/ASSET SALE • DPA 1998 If data controller processes personal data on identifiable data subjects = fair processing principle
• Share sale *Company name > business of X Documents o 1) Obtain consent
o Parent receives proceeds: X à Y à Z - If sells Z, sells Y’s shares ∴ Y receives proceeds • Confidentiality Agreement (Non-Disclosure Agreement) § Inform of reason, e.g. for due diligence on potential sale
o Subsidiaries transfer: If sells Y, subsidiary Z transfers o Seller’s solicitor drafts + potential bidders sign § But confidentiality issues ∴ inform immediately after completion
o If buys holding company, Buyer = new parent of entire group o Scope: For current + future owners of Target o 2) Legitimate interest, e.g. personal data for potential sale
• Asset sale o CROTPA 1999 Successful bidder can enforce against unsuccessful bidders • ≠ Criminal offence
o If sells Z’s business, Seller = Z ∴ Z receives proceeds = cash shell to pass onto shareholders § Affects Seller + preferred bidder, b/c info revealed to unsuccessful bidders/fishing for info o But failure to comply w/ enforcement notice = criminal offence, civil action by employee + bad publicity
o If sells Y’s business, subsidiary Z transfer IF part & parcel of Y’s business • Process Letter • Employment Practice Code:
§ Yes: Mini-share sale = transfers o Auction process: Procedure, timings, info required from bidders (e.g. sources of finance = checks o ANONYMISE data
§ No: Remains w/ Y’s cash shell genuine bids + ££ laundering) § Test = identifiability, e.g. remove names, job titles
o Invitation to treat ≠ binding (to sell to highest bidder) o If sale ≠ proceed, Buyer returns/destroys
PRIVATE TREATY VS. AUCTION SALES *If fails to complete = break fees o But: o If possible, inform employees
PRIVATE TREATY Blackpool o New employer after acquisition = ensures info is relevant, accurate + not excessive
• 1) Agree: - Duty to consider all bids equally = cannot disregard bids • Completion:
o 1. Confidentiality Agreement o Refers to property seperately: LTC owns, not Eurolearn ≠ in share sale ∴ seperate transfer via TR1 o Share sale: Identity of data controller (Target) ≠ change ≠ processing personal data, unless Buyer
§ Seller’s solicitor drafts o Indicative Offers clause: Bid must confirm if for company / company & property + impact on price uses data for new purpose
§ Target may be party / CROTPA o If ≠ make indicative bid = return/destroy + not reveal confidential info o Asset sale: Disclosure + receipt of info = processing ∴ inform data subjects
§ Consistent w/ Heads
• Information Memorandum: Info on Target to base bids
o 2. Heads of Term (Memorandum of Understanding) LISTED COMPANY
o E.g. Sells b/c non-core business, invest in growth / Types of buyers = competitors to ↑ market share,
§ Agreed terms + basis for negotiation CLASS TESTS
investment company, international company wanting UK presence
§ ≠ Binding, except confidentiality/lock-out • Listed companies require shareholder approval for certain transactions
• Indicative Bid
o 3. Lock-Out Agreement *Lock-In ≠ enforceable • % Ratio tests:
o Initial understanding between parties ≠ binding
§ Prevents Seller negotiating w/ other potential Buyers o 1) Assets: Target’s ÷ listed company’s gross assets
§ Exclusivity granted early VS. Auction sale: Once selects preferred bidder *Seller ≠ want REGULATIONS *SHARE SALES / MINI-SHARE SALES, not asset sales o 2) Profits: Target’s ÷ listed company’s profits
• 2) Buyer’s solicitor sends DD Questionnaire + conducts due diligence REGULATED ACTIVITY o 3) Gross capital: Target’s ÷ listed company’s gross capital
• 3) Buyer’s solicitor drafts acquisition agreement • S19(1) FSMA 2000 Cannot carry out regulated activity, unless authorised / exempt o 4) Consideration: Consideration as % of aggregate market value of listed company’s ordinary shares
• 4) Seller’s solicitor prepares disclosure letter • S22(1) ‘Regulated activity’ = SHARE SALES • Thresholds:
• 5) Negotiates AA + DL o Part III Art 76 RAO Specified investments = shares o Class 1: If any % ratio = 25%/more
• 6) Exchange / If conditional, satisfy conditions precedents o Part II RAO Specified activities = auction sale § 1) Notify RIS ASAP w/ prescribed transaction details
• 7) Completion § Art 14 Dealing in investments as principal § E.g. Consideration, value of assets, profits attributed to assets, effect on listed company
§ Art 25 Arranging deals in investments/securities, e.g. help client buy/sell shares § 2) FCA-approved explanatory circular = sent to shareholders
AUCTION § Seller’s solicitor: Art 25 / Art 53 Advising on investments, e.g. merits of selling shares § 3) Shareholder approval *OR = condition precedent ∴ splits exchange + completion
• 1) Identify potential bidders • Exclusions: o Class 2: If any % ratio = 5-25%
• 2) Sign confidentiality agreements o Art 28 Arranging transactions, where arranger = party à Seller, b/c party to share sale agreement § Notify RIS ASAP w/ prescribed transaction details
• 3) Send Process Letter + Information Memorandum o Art 29 Arranging deals via authorised person (financial advisor) à Seller’s solicitor
o Bidders: Prepare indicative bids o Art 70 Sale of body corporate à Both *Same as Art 62 FPO RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
• 4) Prepares data room + reviews indicative bids (VS. Heads of term) • LR 11 Transactions between listed company/subsidiary + related party
INFORMATION MEMORANDUM o Related party: Director/shadow director / substantial shareholder / person w/ significant influence /
o Selected bidders visit data room
Financial promotion any associates
• 5) Seller’s solicitor drafts acquisition agreement
• S21 FSMA Cannot communicate financial promotion = criminal offence, unless authorised / exempt o E.g. management buyouts = Target (listed company/subsidiary) + management
o Bidders: Mark up AA
o Information Memorandum = induces Buyers to buy Target’s shares • 1) Announce to RIS
• 6) Reviews marked-up AA + selected bidders conduct site visits & prepare 2nd bids
• Exemption stated in Information Memorandum: • 2) FCA-approved explanatory circular = sent to shareholders
• 7) Selects preferred bidder: o Art 62 FPO Sale of body corporate
o Factors: Cash, secured funding, unlisted company • 3) OR/conditional
§ 1) Conditions / o But related party cannot vote
• 8) Seller’s solicitor prepares draft disclosure letter § 50%+ voting shares in body corporate (/added to shares already held) +
• 9) Negotiates AA + DL • Exceptions:
§ Parties = individual/company/partnership/group of connected individuals o 1) Small transaction: All % ratios < 0.25%
• 10) Exchange / If conditional, satisfy conditions precedent § 2) (2)(b)(ii) Reasonably regarded as acquiring day-to-day control of body corporate’s affairs o 2) All % ratios < 5%, but 1/more > 0.25% = relaxes rules
• 11) Completion o If sells minority shareholding, only send information memorandum to:
Seller § Art 19(1) Investment professionals DISCLOSURE
§ Art 49(2) High net worth company (20+ member, > £500k) • Listed company must disclose new major developments if ≠ public info + significant effect on share price
• + ↑ Potential buyers
• + Competitive = ↑ price Prospectus • Exception: DTRs May delay if prejudices legitimate interests, e.g. negotiations –
o 1) ≠ Mislead public +
• + ↑ Contractual protection: Seller prepares first draft of AA • S85(1) FSMA Shares ‘offered to public’ = requires prospectus
o 2) Those receiving info owes duty of confidentiality +
• + Controls timetable + disclosure in data room • Exemption: S86(1) Limited to < 150 people / qualified investors (e.g. banks, investment institutions, govt)
o 3) Ensures confidentiality of info
• + Publicity o Reflected in Information Memorandum disclaimer: ‘Intended for limited no. of persons’
• But if breach of confidence in negotiations, e.g. news leak = must disclose
• + Directors can show shareholders they obtained best possible price
Misleading statements e.g. ≠ disclose litigation
COMPETITION LAW *Share and asset sales
• - Few buyers ≠ suited to auction • S89 FSA Criminal offence = *‘Relevant investment’ = shares, not business
o Make statement he knows is materially false/misleading • Either EU (Commission) / UK (CMA)’s jurisdiction, not both
• - Risks low price
• - Costly: ↑ Fees to prepare docs o Dishonestly conceal material facts UK MERGER CONTROL
• - Hard to maintain confidentiality = ↓ sales + staff morale o Recklessly make statement that is materially false/misleading • ‘Relevant merger situation’: 2/more enterprises ceased to be distinct
• - Non-serious bidders fishing for info o + For purpose of inducing someone to enter agreement to buy shares o 1) Turnover test: Target’s turnover in UK = > £70m /
• - If no sale, failure = public • Cannot embellish Information Memorandum o 2) Market share test: Merged entity (Target and Buyer) = 25%+ market share in UK
• - Wastes management time, e.g. sit1e visits, many bidders o Rescission: Not if shares sold +/ § Process Letter: Indicative Offer clause asks bidders to confirm market shares
o Damages • NO duty to notify CMA
Bidders o Against any misrepresenting party o But voluntarily pre-notify, otherwise CMA investigates on its own initiative
• + If few bidders, ↓ competition = ↓ price Smith New Court • Phase I: 40 working days
• + Quicker - Broker overstated interest in Target, which 1 bidder relied on + bought shares o Clearance / undertakings / Phase II
• + Cheaper: ↓ Fees, b/c Seller prepares ↑ docs ∴ Fraudulent misrep = damages • If ‘substantial lessening of competition’ à Phase II = 24 WEEKS
• + If selected as preferred bidder = redresses imbalance, b/c exclusivity period to negotiate o During investigation, Buyer cannot take steps
CONSENTS *Consents = condition precedent ∴ splits exchange + completion
• - No guarantee of success = wasted costs SHAREHOLDER CONSENTS o Clearance / undertakings, e.g. divest all/part of business / blocks merger
• - Potentially high price • Q) AoA requires consent? EU MERGER CONTROL
• - ↓ Contractual protection • S188 CA Directors’ long-term service contracts > 2 years = OR • 1) MUST notify Commission before transaction
• - ↓ Control of timetable + data room = ↓ disclosure • S190 SPT between company + 1/more directors = OR/conditional *Business sale = non-cash assets o High turnover thresholds apply to Buyer’s entire group
• - Spends ↓ time w/ Target’s management • S197 Loans to directors = OR • 2) Requires clearance before completion
• - If confidentiality breach = risks damage to Target *‘Deal leaked to press’ • S217 Pay leaving director = OR o If ‘significantly impedes effective competition’ = no clearance
• S551 Authority to allot = OR • Phase I: 25 working days
Concerns
• Buyer: REGULATORY CONSENTS • Phase II: 90 working days
o Before DD, Seller = • FCA-regulated Target: FCA consent for > 10% changing hands = criminal offence
§ Committed to selling at price Buyer is willing to pay • Newspaper merger: SoS consent
§ ≠ Negotiating w/ other Buyers • Acquires company w/ oil/gas interest: Regulator consent
o Due diligence: 1) Consideration? 2) Worthwhile acquisition? • Aircraft operators require Air Operators’ Certificate from Civil Aviation Authority

, EU Dimension? • Advice: FINANCE + TAX ISSUES
• Primary threshold o Target enters transitional services agreement 1) Charge by way of Legal Mortgage
o All: Worldwide turnover = > €5bn + § LTC continues providing services for short period after completion ∴ time to find alternative • See loan agreement = check EODs
o 2: EU turnover = > €250m arrangements
2) Cross-guarantee
o Exception: Each achieves 2/3 of turnover in same MS o Make new HR/payroll arrangements
• 1) Eurolearn cross-guaranteed LTC’s borrowings
§ Affects profitability: At cost / may cost ↑ in future
• If not, secondary threshold: o Buyer: Post-completion ≠ want Target to guarantee borrowings of non-group company
§ But if Buyer has its own services ≠ issue
o All: Worldwide turnover = > €2.5bn + o Advice: Release at completion
o 3: Turnover = > €100m + 4) Pension schemes § Bank wants new guarantor (e.g. another LTC group company)
o 2: Turnover = > €25m + • Share sale: • 2) LTC cross-guaranteed Eurolearn’s borrowings
o 2: EU turnover = > €100m o S75 Pensions Act 1995 If Target is member of group final salary scheme + in deficit, when leaves o LTC ≠ want to guarantee borrowings of company it no longer controls
o Exception: Each achieves 2/3 of EU turnover in same MS group = Target liable for its portion of deficit *Buyer issue o Advice: Release at completion
• Asset sale:
3) Property e.g. 2000: LTC acquired X for £134k, 2016: Transferred to ERL, Now: ERL leaving group
o Reg 10 TUPE

DUE DILIGENCE
• 1) Intra-group transfer
§ Personal pension scheme rights transfer
o 1. SDLT clawback *Buyer issue
§ Occupational pension scheme rights ≠ transfer
§ Company receiving LAND, b/c intra-group transfer = leaves group within 3 years of transfer
§ But Transfer of Employment (Pension Rights) Regulations 2005 Buyer must set up
§ SDLT clawback arises in company leaving group (ERL)
pension scheme + make min. contributions
• Aim: Investigates Target § Indirectly affects Buyer: ↓ ERL value = ↓ EL value
o S75 Pensions Act 1995 If group final salary scheme, in deficit + all employees transfer ∴ Target
o 1) Decides if requires warranties/indemnities/consents § Advice: Buyer wants ↓ price / indemnity
ceases to participate = Target liable *Seller issue
o 2) Assists negotiations o 2. Exit/degrouping charge *Seller issue
• Once completes actuarial report = revisit issue
o 3) Assesses risks + liabilities = decides whether to go ahead § Company receiving chargeable asset, b/c intra-group transfer = leaves group within 6 years
o 4) Buyer beware (Caveat Emptor): Little protection if ≠ what Buyer expects Due diligence on pensions § Advice: Seller gets tax advice on how to mitigate charge
• Share sale: ↑ Extensive, b/c liabilities remain w/ Target • Confirm:
• 2) Deemed distribution
• Asset sale: Assets being acquired o Registered
Aveling
o Sufficiently funded
• Legal: Solicitors - Intra-group transfer at undervalue = deemed distribution
o All contributions made
o Private Treaty: Buyer’s solicitors send DD questionnaire + gives DD report to Buyer o Advice:
• Details/docs of:
o Auction: Seller sets up data room for selected bidders + gives DD report to bidders = quicker o Pension schemes + benefits § 1. Request copy of LTC’s accounts from time of intra-group transfer = confirms sufficient
• Financial: Accountants o Trustees, trustee annual reports, audited accounts distributable profits at time of transfer ∴ proves lawful distribution
o E.g. trading history, profitability, suppliers, customers, competitors, tax affairs etc. o Actuarial report § 2. Indemnity: If insufficient distributable profits = unlawful distribution ∴ transferee (ERL)
• Commercial: Reports on environment, pensions, insurance, IT, IP o Target’s agreed contributions holds property on constructive trust, not beneficial owner
DATA ROOM o Claims
POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
HR ISSUES CUSTOMER + IP ISSUES • 1) Condition precedent / post-completion matter, e.g. insurance
1) Employment contracts 1) Key contracts • 2) ↓ Price / warranty / indemnity
• 1) Directors’ service contract • Buyer wants them to continue as clients: State how much key client represents total business • 3) Restructure as asset sale
o 1. Missing / onerous RC ≠ enforceable ∴ can compete • See copies of contracts • 4) Withdraw
§ But non-disclosure of confidentiality clause = indefinite ∴ comfort • 1) Duration
§ Advice: o 1. Ending soon

CONSIDERATION
*Considering bids:
§ Target enters enforceable RCs, in return for consideration § Once identifies Buyer, approach client to negotiate longer term § 1) How much?
§ 36 months ≠ reasonable à 12 months o 2. Ended § 2) Form of consideration?
§ LTC to review all service contracts across group § 3) When does Seller receive consideration?
§ Ask if being renegotiated / show new signed contract
§ Keep director for short handover period (1 year), b/c know-how of business + market § If no new contract, ↓ purchase price to reflect impact on Target’s future profits
o 2. Letter varied contract to rolling 1-year 1) CASH
o 3. Typo: “5-year period 2013-2017”
§ Advice: Ask Seller to confirm director accepted variation + check letter signed by director § Confirm contract ends in 2018, not 2017 • 1) Debt free/cash free: Assumes no debt/cash in Target ∴ parties must know how much cash/debt in Target
• 2) Change of control: Other party can terminate if Target’s shares changes hands • 2) Net asset value *Banking docs ≠ issue, b/c bank debt paid off as part of completion
• 2) Employee service contract o 1. Completion accounts
o 1. DPA ‘Processing’ personal data = inform employee of reason, but confidentiality issues o Affects SHARE SALES *Asset sale: Target ≠ change hands, b/c assets transfer
o Too early to approach, b/c response depends on chosen Buyer § Adjusts purchase price post-completion
§ Advice: Anonymise before putting in data room = avoids breaching DPA § At completion, Buyer pays purchase price based on estimate of Target’s NAV
o 2. Statutory notice o Advice: *If key client = Buyer ≠ issue
§ Once finalises accounts + determines actual completion NAV = adjust
§ Employment Rights Act 1996 Employees require 1 week’s notice after 1 month’s service, then 1 § Once identifies Buyer, approach client ASAP + sign waiver not exercise right to terminate
§ Higher NAV = Buyer pays ↑
week’s notice for every year of service up to 12 years when Buyer takes control
§ Lower NAV = Seller refunds
§ Reassure no material change to contract
• 3) Freelancers § Drawn up after completion, b/c info & financial records become available
§ Suggest grace period to not terminate
o Advice: Anonymise before putting in data room = avoids breaching DPA § Schedule sets out completion account details, e.g. who prepares, mechanism, what occurs in
§ Client = strong bargaining position to renegotiate terms
event of dispute, how/when adjusts
Due diligence on employment issues § Condition precedent
§ Agrees max. cap on consideration if ↑/↓
• Key/shared employees • 3) Non-assignment *In termination clauses
o 2. Locked box mechanism
o Affects ASSET SALES
• Salaries + benefits § Valuation of Target based on last set of accounts w/ no adjustment post-completion
• Standard T&C, directors’ service contracts, consultancy agreements, freelancers 2) Debt § + ↑ Certainty
• Notice periods, e.g. onerous • 1) Possible non-payment § Seller indemnifies Buyer for ££ taken out of Target since last set of accounts
• Terminations • 2) Loses customer’s business § Only Seller’s deliberate acts, not general business downturn
• Litigation • Advice: Indemnity to cover unrecoverable part of debt 2) LOAN NOTES
o If small claim ≠ ↓ price, but indemnity o Seller: Ensure Buyer = obligation to use ‘best endeavours’ to collect debt in full
• Buyer leaves some/all consideration to be paid after completion
2) HMRC Investigation: Self-employed? 3) Trade marks
BUYER
• 1) If ‘employees’, Target pays unpaid income tax + NI contributions • 1) No. X for class X due for renewal in XXX
• + ↑ Time to raise cash: Cash flow advantage
• 2) ↑ Employment costs, b/c ↑ employees than expected • 2) No. X for class X which was due for renewal in XXX + no evidence of being renewed
• + Set off warranty/indemnity claims against amount it owes Seller under loan notes
• Advice: • Advice:
o Press HMRC for answer / o How important is trademark? • - Buyer must pay interest to Seller VS. Discretionary dividends on shares
o Seller: If ongoing investigation = indemnity to cover costs (b/c believes investigation will fail) > ↓ price o Is trademark being used in business? o + But tax-deductible, unlike dividends
§ But resist covering ↑ costs incurred going forward if freelancers are kept as employees o Has trademark been renewed? • - Unlike shares, Buyer must raise cash eventually
o Seller pays for expired trademark + Buyer pays for trademark to expire • - ↑ Gearing: Attracts ↓ future lenders/investors
3) Shared services
• Other parts of Seller’s group provides servbices, but ≠ incl. in sale, e.g. HR/payroll 4) Intra-group trading SELLER
• Once Target leaves group, services stop • Q) Are textbooks essential to business in future? • + Interest
• If affects Target’s profitability = depends how shared services costed out in group • Yes: • + Defers tax
o Market rate ≠ affect Target’s profitability o If course materials = designed around these textbooks = costly to change textbooks
o If pays LTC’s costs = Eurolearn worth less than expected ∴ ↓ price o Buyer: Secure supply of textbooks for agreed period after completion ∴ time to adapt courses to • - Delay: Cash flow disadvantage
use diff textbooks • - Cannot redeem if Buyer in financial difficulty
o Seller: Consider on what terms o ∴ Seller should get security/guarantee = ↓ risk e.g. newly incorporated company = get security
• No: If suitable alternatives, substitute textbooks • - Possible set-off
o Depends if Buyer is already in business of language training
• Cost of textbooks = affects profitability + purchase price that Buyer is willing to pay

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lawnotesxo2. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $19.59. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

62555 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$19.59  54x  sold
  • (20)
  Add to cart