100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary *2023* Analyzing International Relations Notes on Readings - GRADE 7,5 $11.27
Add to cart

Summary

Summary *2023* Analyzing International Relations Notes on Readings - GRADE 7,5

1 review
 237 views  15 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of the reading materials for the final exam (2023) for Analyzing International Relations. INCLUDES notes, the puzzle/motivation and core ideas/arguments from (Total: 31 pages): Alexander Wendt’s article (1992) “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Polit...

[Show more]
Last document update: 11 months ago

Preview 2 out of 31  pages

  • November 18, 2023
  • December 29, 2023
  • 31
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: mailkikivannieuwstadt • 1 year ago

I thought I was giving a review to the stuvia website. The notes are perfect. Did I change the review now? :)

reply-writer-avatar

By: giacomoef • 1 year ago

Hi Mailkiki, thank you for changing the review. I appreciate it! Giacomo

avatar-seller
Summary of the reading materials for the final exam (2023) for Analyzing International Relations.
INCLUDES notes, the puzzle/motivation and core ideas/arguments from (Total: 31 pages):
● Alexander Wendt’s article (1992) “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics”,
pp. 391-425.
● Ayşe Zarakol’s introduction (2017) “Theorising Hierarchies” in Zarakol’s (ed.) “Hierarchies in World Politics”, pp.
1-14.
● Henry Farrell & Abraham L. Newman’s article (2019) “Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic
Networks Shape State Coercion”, pp. 42-79
● Nicola Phillips’ article (2017) “Power and inequality in the global political economy”, pp. 429-444.
● Robert D. Putnam’s article (1988) “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games”, pp. 427-460.
● Nicole Deitelhoff and Lisbeth Zimmermann’s article (2020) “Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of
Contestation Affect the Robustness of International Norms”, pp. 51-76.
● Igor Abdalla Medina de Souza’s article (2015) “An offer developing countries could not refuse: How powerful
states created the World Trade Organisation”, pp. 155-181.
● Darren G. Hawkins, David A. Lake, Daniel L. Nielson & Michael J. Tierney’s article (2006) “Delegation under
anarchy: international organizations and principal-agent theory” in the book (2006) “Delegation and Agency in
International Organizations”, pp. 3-38.
● Yf Reykers, John Karlsrud, Malte Brosig, Stephanie C. Hofmann, Cristiana Maglia, & Pernille Rieker’s article (2023)
“Ad hoc coalitions in global governance: short-notice, task- and time-specific cooperation”, pp. 727-745.
● Mette Eilstrup-Sangiovanni & J.C. Sharman’s article (2021) “Enforcers Beyond Borders: Transnational NGOs and
the Enforcement of International Law”, pp. 131-147.
● Xinyuan Dai & Duu Renn’s article (2016) “China and International Order: The Limits of Integration”, pp. 177-197.



*2023* Analyzing International Relations Notes on Readings


Table of Contents
“Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics” 1
“Theorising Hierarchies” 5
“Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion” 8
“Power and inequality in the global political economy” 11
“Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games” 14
“Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Robustness of
International Norms” 16
“An offer developing countries could not refuse: how powerful states created the World
Trade Organisation” 21
“Delegation and Agency in International Organizations” 23
Delegation under anarchy: international organizations & principal-agent theory 23
“Ad hoc coalitions in global governance: short-notice, task- and time-specific cooperation”
24
“Enforcers Beyond Borders: Transnational NGOs and the Enforcement of International
Law” 26
“China and International Order: The Limits of Integration” 29

, 1


“Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power
Politics”
Short Summary

Puzzle/motivation:
● The extent to which state action is influenced by “structure” (anarchy & the distribution of power)
vs. “process” (interaction & learning) + institutions.
● Build a bridge between neorealists & neoliberals, by developing a constructivist argument.
● Both traditions take the self-interested state as the starting point.
➔ Neorealists = anarchies are necessary “self-help” systems (both central authority +
collective security are absent).
➔ Liberals = anarchy does constitute states with self-interested identities exogenous to
practise.
● Modern/postmodern constructivists = how knowledgeable practices constitute subjects.

Core ideas/arguments:
● Argues against the neorealist claim that self-help is given by an anarchy structure exogenously to
process.
● Self-help + power politics do NOT follow logically/causally from anarchy.
● Today’s self-help world is due to process, NOT structure.


Anarchy & Power Politics
Anarchy: Conditions of possibility for causing war → human nature/domestic politics of predator
states.
➔ Self-interested conceptions of security are NOT constitutive property of anarchy.
➔ Self-help/competitive power politics may be produced casually by processes of interaction
between states in which anarchy plays a permissive role.

Political structures (Waltz) defined on 3 dimensions:
1. Ordering principles.
2. Principles of differentiation.
3. Distribution of capabilities.

States act differently toward enemies than they do towards friends (e.g., British missiles to the US vs.
Soviet missiles).

Actors acquire identities by participating in collective meanings.
➔ Identities: Relatively stable, role-specific understandings/expectations about self.
◆ Failure of roles makes defining situations/interests difficult = identity confusion.
◆ Institution: Relatively stable set or “structure” of identities/interests. Come to
confront individuals as more/less coercive social facts.
● Institutionalisation = process of internalising new identities/interests.

Standard continuum of security systems:
1. “Competitive” security system = states identify negatively with each other’s security, one’s
gain is another’s loss (“self-help” form of anarchy).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller giacomoef. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.27. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52928 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.27  15x  sold
  • (1)
Add to cart
Added