100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
CBP Entrance Exam Complete Study Guide – Q&A $10.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

CBP Entrance Exam Complete Study Guide – Q&A

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

CBP Entrance Exam Complete Study Guide – Q&A

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • November 28, 2023
  • 11
  • 2023/2024
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
avatar-seller
CBP Entrance Exam Complete Study Guide – Q&A
Some 480,000 immigrants were living in a certain country in 1999. Although
most of these immigrants were not employed in professional occupations,
many of them were. For instance, many of them were engineers and many of
them were nurses. Very few of these immigrants were librarians, another
professional occupation.

From the information given above, it can validly concluded that, in 1999, in
the country described above:

A) Most immigrants were either engineers or nurses

B) It is not the case that some of the nurses were immigrants

C) None of the engineers were immigrants

D) Some of the engineers were immigrants ✔️Ans -D) Some of the
engineers were immigrants

A trucking company can act as a 'common carrier' - for hire to the general
public at published rates. As a common carrier, the trucking company is liable
for any cargo damage, unless the company can show that it was not negligent.
If the company can demonstrate that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
for cargo damage. In contrast, a 'contract carrier' ( a trucking company hired
by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo damage
spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under common
carrier authority, was in a 5-vehivle accident that damaged its cargo. A Nichlos
Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in the
same accident, and its cargo was also damaged.

From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that, in
reference to the accident:

A) If Claus Inc. is liable, then it can show that it was not negligent ✔️Ans -C)
If Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable

, A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater
reliance on electronic mail (e-mail) systems. As this usage grows, there are
increasing chances of conflict between the users' expectations of privacy and
public access rights. In some investigation, access to ALL e-mail, including
those messages stored in archival files and messages outside the scope of the
investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of this, some people send
messages through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face or written
formally.

From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly concluded that:

A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as part of investigations
have contained messages that would neve be said face-to-face

B) Some messages that people would never say face-to-face are sent in e-mail
messages

C) Some e-mail messages have been requested as part of investigations

D) E-mail m ✔️Ans -A) Some e-mails messages that have been requested as
part of investigations have contained messages that would neve be said face-
to-face

Often, crimes are characterized as either "malum in se"-inherently evil-or
"malum prohibitum"-criminal because they are declared as offenses by a
legislature. Murder is an example of the former. Failing to file a tax return
illustrates the later. Some jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes
"malum in se" and "malum prohibitum", although many still do.

From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that:

A) Many jurisdictions no longer distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum"

B) Some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes "malum in se" and
"malum prohibitum"

C) Some crimes characterized as "malum in se" are not inherently evil

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller LeCrae. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79373 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart