AQA Psychology for A Level Year 1 & AS - Student Book
Full mark essay for anxiety and EWT from the topic of Memory. Written for the NEW 2015 AQA Psychology spec. It hasn't been officially published anywhere so you can submit it as your own.
AQA Psychology AS/A Level - Topic 1: Social Influence
Memory summary notes, aqa a level psychology
AQA A-Level Psychology | A* Student Notes | Social Influence
All for this textbook (173)
Written for
A/AS Level
AQA
Psychology
Memory
All documents for this subject (457)
Seller
Follow
aleema
Reviews received
Content preview
Discuss research into the effects of anxiety on eyewitness testimony
Anxiety is an unpleasant emotional state where we fear that something bad is going to happen.
People are often anxious in stressful situation. For example, witnessing a crime or being interviewed
as a witness. Anxiety is often accompanied by physiological symptoms – sweaty palms, shallow
breath, elevated pulse, etc. Research has also demonstrated that anxiety can often have a profound
effect on EWT.
Christianson and Hubinette conducted a study to demonstrate that anxiety has a negative effect on
accuracy of EWT. 58 witnesses to bank robberies in Sweden, who were either victims who had been
threatened or bystanders, were questioned between 4 and 15 months after the incident. However,
their results were the opposite of what they had expected. All the witnesses had generally good
memories of the event, with more than 75% accurate recall. They found that anxiety had actually
aided recall, rather than causing inaccuracies, as the higher anxiety condition, those who were
actually threatened, had the highest recall. This therefore implies that anxiety can have a positive
effect on EWT rather than a negative effect. Additionally, the fact that this is a field study means that
it has a higher ecological validity thus demonstrating how it can be applied to EWT in real life.
Contrastingly, Johnson and Scott set out to prove that anxiety has a positive effect on EWT. However,
like Christianson and Hubinette, they found that their results produced the opposite of what they
expected. Participants were asked to sit in a waiting room where they overheard an argument in the
room next door. A moment later, they saw a man running through the room. Those in one condition
saw the man with a greasy pen while those in the other condition saw him with a bloody knife. The
participants had to then identify the man from a set of photographs. The findings appeared to
support the weapon focus effect, which refers to the attention directed toward a weapon in a
situation. In the low anxiety condition, where the participants saw a greasy pen, the average recall of
the man was 49%. However, in the high anxiety condition, where the participants saw a bloody knife,
the average recall dropped to 33%. Conclusively, Loftus developed the idea of the weapon focus
effect, suggesting that the presence of a weapon can lead to higher anxiety and therefore
inaccuracies in recall. Witnesses can become drawn to the weapon rather than the culprit, leading to
inaccurate identification and lower levels of accuracy in recall. Nonetheless, this is a lab study, lacking
ecological validity, and so cannot exclusively be applied to real life.
In evaluation of both studies, it is unsure as to whether the effects of anxiety, a lab or field study or
even the time difference of questioning are responsible for the levels of accuracy in recall. Therefore,
these studies may not be able to demonstrate the definite effects of anxiety on EWT.
Deffenbacher (1983) reviewed 21 studies highlighting the effects of anxiety on EWT. While 10 of
these studies demonstrated that higher anxiety levels increased accuracy in eyewitness memory, 11
of them showed the opposite. Deffenbacher suggested that the Yerkes-Dodson effect can account for
the inconsistencies in the results of these studies. According to the Yerkes-Dodson effect, there
would be occasions where moderate anxiety would enhance eyewitness accuracy. If anxiety is too
high or too low, accuracy will be reduced.
Pickel (1998) suggested that reduced accuracy due to the weapon focus effect was due to surprise
rather than anxiety. To test his proposal, he arranged for participants to watch a thief entering a
hairdressing salon carrying either scissors (high threat, low surprise), a handgun (high threat, high
surprise), a wallet (low threat, low surprise) or raw chicken (low threat, high surprise). The results
established that identification was more accurate in the high surprise conditions, supporting the
notion that the weapon focus effect is due to surprise not anxiety.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller aleema. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.58. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
