Essay
Mind brain type identity theory A* essay
- Course
- Institution
Mind brain type identity theory A* essay
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
MasterPhilosopherAlevel
Reviews received
Content preview
Mind-Brain Type Identity is Correct. DiscussIntent: As Ockham’s razor dictates that the burden of proof is on the more complex theory (dualism is
more complex than physicalism), we will explore two dualist arguments against physicalism, and apply
them directly to identity theory. After this, we will consider one issue that is particular to identity theory
(multiple realisability). We will conclude that the dualist arguments are insufficient to reject physicalism.
However, identity theory cannot provide a convincing response to multiple realisability. Upshot, we should
explore alternative physicalist theories (e.g. eliminative materialism).
Against: Chalmers’ philosophical zombies argument – as a philosophical zombie is metaphysically possible,
mental states cannot be reduced to physical states, including brain states (a conscious human being has
the same brain states as a p-zombie, but possess a different mental state, qualia).
For: Chalmers’ begs the question assuming that physicalism is false and mental states are not
analytically identical to brain states (i.e. a p-zombie is only logically possible if we assume mental
states don’t analytically reduce to physical states).
Against: Identity theory doesn’t claim that mental states and brain states are analytically identical.
Therefore, according to identity theory a p-zombie is logically possible.
For: Just because a scenario is logically possible this doesn’t mean it is metaphysically possible (e.g.,
‘water is H30’ is logically possible, but not metaphysically possible). Mental states and brain states
may not share the same analytic identity, but they may share the same metaphysical identity, and
therefore – contra Chalmers – a p-zombie may be logically possible but this doesn’t mean it is
metaphysically impossible.
Intermediate Conclusion: Chalmers’ argument is insufficient to reject the identity claim that mental
states are metaphysically identical to brain states.
Against: Jackson’s Knowledge/Mary argument – Mary knew all about what brain states are realised when
people look at colour. When she saw colour for the first time she learnt a new, non-physical, phenomenal
fact about what it is like to experience colour. The mental cannot be entirely captured by brain states.
For: Mary didn’t increase her propositional knowledge [about a phenomenal fact], but ability
knowledge; how to imagine and identify red.
Against: We can conceive of someone who has both abilities, but only knows what it is like to
experience colour at the point at which they experience it, either in the imagination or reality.
For: Mary didn’t increase her propositional knowledge [about a phenomenal fact], but
acquaintance knowledge; first-hand, direct experience of the brain state realised by experiencing
colour. She already knew about the relevant brain state, now she simply has knowledge of it.
Against: Acquaintance knowledge is a means by which we can increase our propositional
knowledge. True, Mary increased her acquaintance knowledge, but at the same time she gained
propositional about what it is like to experience colour (a phenomenal fact). A fact she would
recognise she didn’t know before experiencing colour.
For: Mary increased her propositional knowledge, but only of an old physical fact. For example, if
someone knew that ‘ice is water’, and then after being taught that water is H20, knew that ‘ice is
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MasterPhilosopherAlevel. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $26.81. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79373 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now