,Constituents Are these sentences good english sentences?
1) Between you and I, the show was awful.
➸ Prepositions are followed by accusative forms of pronouns: with me, him, her, them - *with I,
he, she, they ▸ Node = the
2) You and me are going to have fun. ▸ Domination
What is syntax?
➸ Subjects are in the nominative form: I am going to have fun. - *Me am going to have fun. ▸ Constituen
3) Neither Tasha no Ashanti are coming.
➸ None, no-one, and nothing are singular forms Phrase mar
4) I‘ll no can tell ye. Constituency
➸ Scottish English, but *I‘ll not can tell you. ▸ The movem
5) Mummy home. ▸ The substi
➸ Early child language ▸ The omissi
▸ The wh-qu
To recap Example
▸ we will describe the syntax (i.e. the internal structure) of grammatical English sentences There was a
The syntax of a language ▸ grammaticality is an aggregated judgment about structure from all native speakers
The syntax of a particular language L is a description of:
▸ How words are organised into groups (called phrases) in L Why do this?
▸ How these phrases are organised into sentences in L ▸ helps to develop analytical skills (applying diagnostics, testing hypothesis)
▸ provides some insight into why certain sentences sound ‚strange‘
The main aim of this course ▸ provides a useful pedagogical tool for teaching English (e.g. at high school or abroad)
▸ develop a basic familiarity with the syntax of English ▸ helpful in learning other languages (some universality)
Grammaticality Syntax: Chunks or strings of words?
▸ in this course we are only interested in describing the grammatical sentences of English ▸ the basic unit of the sentence is the word
▸ but what are the grammatical sentences of English? ▸ Are sentences simply strings of individual words or are sentences built from chunks of words?
➸ is there a comprehensive list?
▸ no list is available because sentences are potentially infinite B) The subst
2 declaratives:
1) Gareth‘s nose is very very very very very very very….(handsome). 1) Susan will leave.
2) Lucia owns a cat that ate a rat that ate a spider that caught a fly that saw a banana 2) The boy will leave.
that…
▸ with no list available, we ask native English speakers to judge which sentences are good and How do we turn declaratives (statements) into interrogatives (questions)?
which are bad ➸ Swap will and the preceding word:
▸ native speakers have implicit knowledge about their language 1) Will Susan leave?
⊳ Where did this knowledge come from? ➸ Language Acquisition 2) *The will boy leave?
⊳ What form does this knowledge take (e.g. a list of rules)? ➸ Formal Linguistic Theory
➸ Swap will and the first phrase (chunk):
Grammaticality versus acceptability 1) Will Susan leave?
A) Acceptability = a general judgement about a sentence‘s suitability in a real-world context
2) Will the boy leave?
B) Grammaticality = whether a sentence displays acceptable structure
Conclusion: Syntactic rules make reference to phrases. Therefore, sentences must be ‚chunky‘.
▸ unacceptable sentences can still be grammatical
1) Colourless green ideas sleep furiously. Phrases
[nonsensical] Sentences are composed of phrases and phrases are composed of words:
2) I enjoyed the party very very very (x500) much.
[too long for conversation]
← ☒
3) To the king: Yo my homeboy, whaddup?
☒
[wrong register]
▸ an ungrammatical sentence is marked by an asterisk (*)
⊳ *Harry married has Megan.
⊳ *Not queen the is happy very.
⊳ *Kate jealous maybe is. D) The wh-q
, Functions Subjects and predicates
▸ both example sentences fit the same phrase marker
heads and modifiers
▸ the phrase dangerous criminals is a
➸ eternal structure of this NP?
Reminder from last week: Phrases
1) The nasty burglar had taken a bath.
▸ S always immediately dominates two constituents
▸ these are the subject and the predicate
▸ the phrase extremely dangerous is
Some grammatical properties of english subjects
▸ forming yes/no questions involves inverting the order of subject and auxiliary verb ➸ eternal structure of this AP?
2) Those people from Moscow left yesterday.
1) The man stroking a cat will bake a cake.
2) Will the man stroking a cat bake a cake?
Heads and modifiers
▸ subjects show agreement with the finite verb ▸ the functional relationship between
3) The man bakes many cakes. ▸ a modifier is dependent on its head
4) Those men bake many cakes. ▸ a head is not dependent on its modi
1) Batman regularly apprehends (dang
Constituents in sentences
Looking inside the predicate ➸ noun phrase
▸ the predicate must contain at least one verb 2) These people are (extremely) dange
The president entered the room.
▸ it may also contain other items ➸ adjective phrase
He entered the room.
Who entered the room? - The president.
Heads and complements
▸ the phrase into the ditch is a prepo
The president entered it.
An aside: Talking about structural relations
What did the president enter? - The room.
▸ if two nodes are immediately dominated by the same node, then they are sisters a) Charles fell into the ditch.
▸ an immediate domination relationship is also called a mother-daughter relationship b) *Charles fell into.
➸ Nominal constituents: The president (a phrase) + The room (a phrase)
⊳ A is the mother of B and C c) *Charles fell the ditch.
⊳ B and C are the daughters of A
3 possible structures:
▸ the functional relationship between
⊳ the complement is dependent o
Function versus form ⊳ the head is dependent on its co
▸ subject and predicate are grammatical functions
▸ Function = a dependency relation with respect to a sister constituent
▸ Form = the syntactic category of a constituent (noun, verb, etc.) Recursive phrases
▸ phrases often contain many modifier
An analogy ▸ constituency tests show that:
1) sings songs is constituent
2) sings songs acts like a verb ph
▸ often seems to modify the VP sings
Simplifying the problem
▸ therefore, the VP is a head
▸ let‘s compare our sentence to a simpler version, such as:
▸ in recursive phrases, there is one h
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller SerenaCécile. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.06. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.