The Complete Companion for AQA, Psychology A Level
Complete breakdown of the Research Methods section of the AQA () Psychology specification. Everything you need for the large section in the paper 2 exam - covering both AS and A2 content. Includes a breakdown of all the stats tests and all definitions and evaluation points.
Discuss explanations of a nicotine addiction (16 marks)
AQA A-level psychology HUMANISTIC APPROACH NOTES
AQA Psychology Paper 1 Summary Grid
All for this textbook (76)
Written for
A/AS Level
AQA
Psychology
Research Methods (71817182)
All documents for this subject (286)
3
reviews
By: emiliaf • 2 year ago
By: huzhayfaejaz • 5 year ago
thanks babe
By: lucygrace01 • 6 year ago
Seller
Follow
erinhk1
Reviews received
Content preview
Experimental method Control of variables
Experimental method: manipulation of an independent Extraneous variables: any variable other than IV that may
variable to measure the effect on the dependent variable have an effect on the DV if not controlled
Aims: general statement of what the researcher intends - Do not vary systematically to IV
to investigate – purpose of the study. Cofounding variables: variable other than the IV that may
Hypotheses: clear, precise, testable statements have affected the DV – cannot be sure of true source of
predicting/stating the relationships between variables change in DV
being investigated. - Vary systematically to IV
o Must be stated at outset. Demand characteristics: cue from researcher/situation
- Directional: states direction of difference or that may be interpreted as revealing the purpose to ppts
relationship. - Lead to change in behaviour (under-perform/
o One-tailed under-perform) – unnatural behaviour
- Non-directional: does not state the direction - Ppts not passive – participant reactivity
o Two-tailed Investigator effects: effect of investigators behaviour on
Variables: anything that can vary/change within an research outcome
investigation - Unconscious/conscious
- Independent: aspect that is manipulated by the - Can be in design, sample selection, interaction
researcher (can also change naturally) with ppts
o To measure effect on DV - Researcher bias
- Dependent: variable measure by researcher – Randomisation: use of chance in order to control effect of
changes bias when designing materials/deciding order of
o Should be a result of the IV conditions.
Operationalise: clearly defining variables in terms of how Standardisation: using the exact same formulised
they can be measured. procedures/instructions for all ppts in research study
Experimental design Types of experiment
Experimental design: different ways in which the testing Laboratory experiments:
of participants can be organised in relation to - Conducted in highly controlled environments (not
experimental conditions always a lab) – researcher manipulates IV, records
Independent measures: effect on DV.
- Participants allocated to different conditions – - High control over extraneous variables –
take part in one condition (compare conditions) demonstrates high internal validity, can
- Not the same conditions – individual differences determine change in DV is the result of the IV.
- Less economical – each participant represented - Easier replication – ensure findings are valid.
one result – need more participants - Lack of generalisability – often involve artificial
- No order effects – less likely to guess aims, get task/lack real-life experience – low ecological
tired or bored. validity and mundane realism.
Random allocation: remove individual differences in Field experiments:
independent groups by randomly assigning participants to - IV manipulated in more natural/everyday setting
different conditions - Higher mundane realism – natural environment
Repeated measures: - Produce authentic/more valid behaviour
- All participants take part in all experimental (especially if covert)
conditions (compare sets of data – like with like) - Loss of control – cause and effect more difficult to
- Order effects – likely to get bored, tired or wise establish (low internal validity – replication is
- Bigger chance of demand characteristics hard)
- Individual differences are controlled (none) Natural experiment:
- Fewer participants needed = cost effective - Researcher takes advantage of a pre-existing IV
Counterbalancing: control order effects in repeated (change in IV would happen researcher) – records
measures – half take part in one order, half the other. effect on DV.
Matched pairs: - Provides opportunities for research that would
- Participants are matched on some variable(s) that otherwise be impractical/unethical
may affect the DV – one goes to A the other to B - High external validity – involve study of real-life
, - Requires a pre-test = costly and time consuming issues/problems/events
- Participants cannot be matched exactly (even - May only happen rarely – limits generalisability
identical twins - No random allocation = socially sensitive.
- Order effects and demand characteristics less of a Quasi-experiments:
problem - IV based on pre-existing differences between
people (IV simply exists) – e.g. age, gender,
anxiety
- No manipulation
- Controlled conditions = high internal validity
- Cofounding variables from not randomly
allocating
Sampling Sampling
Population: group of people who are the focus of the Stratified sample:
researcher’s interest – target population - Composition of sample represents/reflects the
Sample: group of people who take part in research proportions of people in subgroups in target pop.
investigation – drawn from target population - Identify strata, work our proportions and select
Sampling technique: methods used to select people from using random sampling.
the target population - Avoids researcher bias
Random sample: - Representative – accurate reflection – generalise
- Sophisticated – all members of target population - Not perfect – cannot reflect all differences
have equal chance of being picked. Opportunity sample:
- Compile list, assign numbers and randomly - Researcher takes a chance to ask whoever is
generate sample around at the time of their study
- Free from researcher bias – no influence over who - Convenient – save time and effort
is selected - Unrepresentative of target population – drawn
- Time consuming/difficult to obtain – some from one area/likely psychology students
participants may refuse (end up being volunteer) - Researcher bias – may avoid people
- May end up unrepresentative. Volunteer bias:
Systematic sample: - Participants self-selected themselves to be the
- Every nth number of target population is selected sample
- List of target pop, alphabetise, nominate system, - Place an advert/ask people to raise hands
work through list until sample is complete. - Easy – minimal effort required
- Free from researcher bias – beyond influence - Volunteer bias – attract certain profile of person
- Usually representative (is possible but unlucky to (helpful, keen and curious) – affects
be unrepresentative). generalisability
Ethical issues Ethical issues
Ethical issues: arise when conflict arises between rights of Deception:
ppts and goals of research to produce authentic data. - Deliberately misleading/withholding information
Informed consent: from ppts – not revealing adequate information.
- Making ppts aware of the aims, procedures, rights - Overcome by giving full debrief at end of study
and what data will be used for. and provide chance to withdraw data.
- Informed judgement to participate – sign consent Confidentiality:
- Can produce unnatural behaviour as aims are - Ppts have the right over information about
known themselves – right to privacy
- Overcome by issuing letter or consent detailing - Confidential information should be protected
relevant information (under 16 = parental (Data Protection Act)
consent) - Use the act to protect ppts, location of study and
- Presumptive consent: ask similar group if study is institutions
acceptable – consent of original ppts presumed. - Overcome by using numbers/initials instead of
- Prior general consent: ppts give permission to names – remind them of their data being
various studies – one involving deception. protected
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller erinhk1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.55. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
