Summary

Summary Russia 1917-91 - Economy

1 purchase

Course
Unit 1E - Russia, 1917-91: from Lenin to Yeltsin

Institution
PEARSON (PEARSON)

Written by a Cambridge Law student with an A* at history A-level. Outlines the successes and failures of Soviet economic policy - very succinct and organised. It is categorised by industry, agriculture, social standards (including both consumer goods and living conditions), military and ideology...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 23 pages

View example

Uploaded on February 17, 2024
Number of pages 23
Written in 2022/2023
Type Summary

industry
agriculture
social standards
living standards
consumer goods
military
ideology

Study Level
A/AS Level
Examinator
PEARSON (PEARSON)
Subject
History 2015
Unit
Unit 1E - Russia, 1917-91: from Lenin to Yeltsin

$9.06

Also available in package deal from $32.39

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Also available in package deal (1)

Russia 1917-91, complete notes from a Cambridge student with A* at history A-level

$ 45.30 $ 32.39

2x sold

5 items

1. Summary - Russia 1917-91 - control of the people
2. Summary - Russia 1917-91 - party and government
3. Summary - Russia 1917-91 - collapse of the ussr
4. Summary - Russia 1917-91 - lives of citizens
5. Summary - Russia 1917-91 - economy
Show more

Economy
Industry

War Communism 1918-21
 Led to plummet in industrial production, with 1921 output only 1/5 of 1913 output
- caused by disorganization
 instability + upheaval caused by civil war (disruptions in supply chains etc)
 industrial workforce declined from 3 million to 1.2 million 1917-22

NEP 1921-28
 Industrial production output increased (by factor of 5 1921 to 1928) due to adoption of
more capitalist leaning policies during the NEP period AND the relative stability after the
end of the civil war
 Although economy did improve under NEP, this is mainly because it was in a terrible
state in the aftermath of the civil war; the economic growth in the period was relatively
quite limited
- GDP per capita in 1928 same as 1913
- By 1928 the economy had stopped growing

First three ‘Five year plans’ 1928-40
 Resulted in huge industrial output increase + huge advances in electrification
- Coal + oil production increased by factor of 3 1928-40
- Iron + steel production increased by factor of 4 1928-40
- Electric power increased by factor of 10 1928-40
 Big increase in mechanized transport + large expansion of transport networks
- 700 lorries 1928 to 136,000 lorries 1940
- 2000 tractors 1928 to 66,000 tractors 1940
 Impressive projects testament to huge gains in heavy industry

, - Dnieper dam built 1932 (world’s largest hydroelectric dam (60 metres high and
800 metres across)
- 141 mile ‘White sea’ canal built connecting white sea to Baltic Sea + used for
transport of ppl + goods
- First line of Moscow Metro (huge + magnificent underground station which made
the capital significantly more interconnected) opened 1935
 Huge output from factories
- Chelyabinsk: major tractor producing centre (1940, 100,000 tractors produced)
- Stalingrad centre of heavy industry (by 1939, its tractor works was producing half
of tractors in USSR)
 More detailed plan for each industry + region during second + third five year plans
(targets, costs, labour, prices etc all planned)  overproduction + underproduction
continued but not on same scale
 Huge inefficiency (overproduction + underproduction AND poor quality) resulting from
- lack of detailed planning and coordination of both resources and workforce (officials
and managers largely left to achieve targets)
- unachievably high targets set (created strong competition for the limited resources
available + forced firms to order more than was necessary to ensure they had a
sufficient supply)
- Problem exacerbated by
 Poor transportation system (inability to transport resources across country)
 Great purges 1936-38 (deprived economy of valuable, capable administrators
and leaders which could organise economy)
 Stalin’s response (ordered those that complained or criticised to be executed
and imprisoned, eg in Shakhty trial which led to five managers and technical
staff administering coal mine executed + rest imprisoned) which led to figures
being forged + worsening chaos of economy

Fourth + Fifth ‘Five year plans’ 1945-53
 Soviet industry quickly rebuilt beyond pre-war levels despite suffering huge destruction
(70% of industrial production capability lost by end of WW2 + 28 million ppl killed)
- 88% of investment went into heavy industry + armaments production
- Resulted in coal, oil and steel production doubling 1945 to 1950, + by 1950, coal, oil
+ steel output had exceeded 1940 levels
- Success is testified by fact that economy became fastest growing in world

, Khrushchev 1953 – 64
- Significant gains in light industry
 Synthetic fibre production increased by factor of 2.5
 Overall increase in consumer production of 60%
 Production of modern equipment increased (eg fertiliser production increased by
19 million tonnes / yr across period)
- Economy growing as a whole
 Annual growth rate 7% during 1950s (compared to 3% for US)
- Improvements in transport
 Important for logistical side of economy (moving machinery, resources etc)
o diesel trains added to Russian railways + some railway lines electrified
o New rail lines opened into virgin lands to transport crops/supplies
- Slow down in economy’s growth rate
 1950-58, economy grew at average of 7% per year (US only 3%)
 1958-64, growth slowed to 5%

Reasons for poor performance

 Long term problems (K refused to implement fundamental reform)
o Command economy (not designed to produce consumer goods or
improve efficiency (intensive rather than extensive growth))
 Very difficult to centrally manage production of complex goods
such as cars, lamps and watches with crude target system based
on quantity rather than quality, eg when consumer industries such
as furniture factories set targets for value of goods, they produced
small number of expensive goods which no one could afford
 Improving efficiency (eg of mines + factories) relies on detailed
information about particular factories + also ability to adapt to
unique needs, neither of which central command structure could
satisfy
o Military spending
 USSR committed to high levels of military spending, limiting funds
available for industrial development
 Although cut military spending from 12% to 9% between 1955 and
1958, series of cold war crises (including Berlin Crisis (Ultimatum

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Camhistnotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.06. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69052 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling