Class notes

PSYC 111 EXAM 4: SOCIAL MODULE STUDY GUIDE

0 purchase

Course
PSYC 111 (PSYC111)

Institution
State University Of New York - Binghamton

A comprehensive study guide for Exam 4: Social Module of the course General Psychology (PSYC 111), taught by Dr. Brittany Race, offered at SUNY Binghamton. This study guide covers the exam's important notes, vocabulary, etc.. Also includes review questions and answers.

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 20 pages

View example

Uploaded on February 20, 2024
Number of pages 20
Written in 2022/2023
Type Class notes
Professor(s) Dr. brittany race
Contains Social module

psychology
general psychology
psyc 111
dr race
dr brittany race
social
module
exam review
exam 4
study
social module
suny binghamton
class notes
introduction to psychology
study guide
exam

$11.48

Also available in package deal from $35.98

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Also available in package deal (1)

PSYC 111 EXAM 2-5 STUDY GUIDES

$ 45.92 $ 35.98

1x sold

4 items

1. Class notes - Psyc 111 exam 2 biologic module study guide
2. Class notes - Psyc 111 exam 3: cognitive module study guide
3. Class notes - Psyc 111 exam 4: social module study guide
4. Class notes - Psyc 111 exam 5: clinical module study guide
Show more

EXAM 4 REVIEW: SOCIAL MODULE

SOCIAL

IMPORTANT TERMS

SOCIAL COMPARISON THEORY: we evaluate ourselves by comparing ourselves to
others, generally comparing to similar people
- UPWARD: comparing ourselves to someone that's doing better than us, tends to
make us angry or upset or we can use it as fuel for change
- DOWNWARD: to someone doing worse than us, tend to make us feel good
about ourselves

ENLIGHTENMENT EFFECT: occurs when you learn about psychology and that
learning causes a change in your behavior

HALO EFFECT: when someone has one positive trait you assume they have many
positive traits; often times that positive trait is attractiveness and therefore if someone’s
attractive you would assume they're nice

SELF-FULFILLING PROPHECY: believing something until you cause it to occur (e.g.
stereotypes, when you believe someone would respond in a certain way you act a
specific way to them, and through that change in behavior they’re led to react how you
expected them to)

ATTITUDES

COMPONENT
- AFFECTIVE: how you feel about something (e.g. chocolate pie = happiness &
joy)
- BEHAVIORAL: how you WANT to respond, not necessarily how you actually
respond (e.g. presented with a choco pie you WANT to shove your face into it,
doesn't mean you would b/c of social norms you will change that behavior)
- COGNITIVE: how you think about the object (e.g. past memories, what the
object is connected to)

DIMENSIONS
- STRENGTH: how strong the attitude is (e.g. if choco pie is your fav dessert you
are unlikely to change the “ABC” of attitude)

, - ACCESSIBILITY: how easily you are able to access those attitudes
- AMBIVALENCE: when you have a positive and negative attitude toward the
object

ATTITUDE CHANGE COMPONENTS

SOURCE: person/company wanting to cause change
RECEIVER: who they're hoping to change
MESSAGE: what they're saying or doing to cause the change
CHANNEL: how they're distributing their message, can be really important b/c different
receivers can have different channels

ATTITUDE CHANGE

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE: when we have two opposing beliefs it makes us
uncomfortable, to avoid that discomfort we try to change something
- people came in to do a boring task, turning knob slightly one at a time
- need participant to tell the next participant that this task is fun and exciting
(researcher is functionally telling participant to lie), “if you do this i’ll pay you a
dollar or 20 bucks”, everyone said yes
- they go and tell the participant (except its not really a participant), half the
participants are lying for a dollar, half lying for 20
- after they lied, researcher asked them how much they enjoyed the very boring
task; most researchers believe 20 bucks participants would have bigger
enjoyment, but 20 bucks participants rated the experiment as very boring, 1
dollar participants rated the experiment as very fun
- the 20 bucks people have justification for lying, while 1 dollar people have no
justification (“i lied, lying is bad”), they cant change what they said to the
participants but they can change their response to the rating (they cant change
the actions but they changed their attitude, kinda like convinced themselves to
think it’s fun)

SELF-PERCEPTION THEORY: we determine our attitude by looking at our behavior; if
we change our behavior we can change our attitude, this may not happen consciously
(e.g. dating someone that enjoys horror movies but b/c you love that person you watch
horror movies with them, changing your behavior to change you attitude about the
object)

, IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT THEORY: express different attitude depending on the
impression you’re trying to get

ELABORATION LIKELIHOOD MODEL: theory of attitude change with two pathways
- CENTRAL PATHWAY focus on the argument for change (e.g. political), hard to
have change but the change that comes with it tends to be long-term
- PERIPHERAL PATHWAY is trying to cause change through any means but your
argument (e.g. kids breakfast cereal, no argument but using toys and mascots to
distract children into buying the cereal), easier to change but that change is
short-lived

FOOT IN THE DOOR (FITD): smaller requests are asked in order to gain compliance
with larger requests

DOOR IN THE FACE (DITF): works in the opposite direction, where larger requests are
asked, with the expectation that they will be rejected, in order to gain compliance for
smaller requests

ATTRIBUTIONS

STABLE VS UNSTABLE: explanation unlikely to change; likely to change

INTERNAL VS EXTERNAL: assuming the person or yourself caused the situation to
happen; something in the environment caused the situation to happen

INDIVIDUALISM vs COLLECTIVISM: making decisions on your own; make decisions
based on the group, prioritize other people first

FUNDAMENTAL ATTRIBUTION ERROR: where we incorrectly attribute a person's
actions. For example, when someone cuts us up on the road, we may think it's because
of their personality. They are simply not nice.

DEFENSIVE ATTRIBUTION ERROR: a bias or error in attributing cause for some event
such that a perceived threat to oneself is minimized (e.g. people might blame an
automobile accident on the other driver's mistake because this attribution lessens their
perception that they themselves are responsible for the accident)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller khloros. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67479 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling