FTCE ESE k12 193 CORRECTLY ANSWERED QUESTIONS LATEST UPDATE
3 views 0 purchase
Course
NURSING 706
Institution
NURSING 706
FTCE ESE k-12 193 CORRECTLY ANSWERED QUESTIONS LATEST UPDATE
English
IDEA
*Brown v. Board of Education, 1954
*Diana v. The State Board of Education, 1970
Wyatt v. Stickney, 1971
*Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens (PARC) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1972
*Mills v. Board of Ed...
FTCE ESE k-12 193 CORRECTLY ANSWERED
QUESTIONS LATEST UPDATE
1). English
Ans:
2). Idea
Ans: Individuals with Disabilities Act. Requires states to provide free, appropriate
public education for all students with disabilities who participate in special education.
The four main challenge areas: learning, social/emotional, motor skills, and
communication. The basic source of law for special education. Represents the latest
phase in the philosophy of educating children with disabilities
3). *brown v. board of education, 1954
Ans: Topeka, Kansas. Addressed the inequality of "separate but equal" facilities on the
basis of race. School segregation became illegal.
4). *diana v. the state board of education, 1970
Ans: This case resulted in the decision that all children must be tested in their native
language
5). Wyatt v. stickney, 1971
Ans: Established the right to adequate treatment (education) for institutionalized
persons with mental retardation
PaperStoc.com Page 1 of 28
, 6). *pennsylvania association for retarded citizens (parc) v. commonwealth of pennsylvania,
1972
Ans: The first right to education lawsuit. Laid the foundation for the right to education
for all children with disabilities previously denied if they had not attained a mental age of
5 by the start of first grade. Special Education was guaranteed to children with mental
retardation. The victory in this case sparked other court cases for children with other
disabilities.
7). *mills v. board of education of the district of columbia, 1972
Ans: The right to special education was extended to all children with disabilities, not
just mentally retarded children. Judgements in PARC and Mills paved the way for P.L.
94-142. Students with disabilities must be given education regardless of the schools'
financial limitations.
8). Public law 93-112 (rehabilitation amendments of 1973)
Ans: The first comprehensive federal statute to address specifically the rights of
disabled youth. It prohibited illegal discrimination in education, employment, or housing
on the basis of a disability.
9). Section 504, rehabilitation act of 1973
Ans: Section 504 expands on older law by extending its protection to other areas that
receive federal assistance, such as education. Protected individuals must (a) have a
physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities,
such as self-care, walking, seeing, breathing, working, or learning; (b) have a record of
such an impairment; or (c) be regarded as having such an impairment. A disability in
itself is not sufficient grounds for a complaint of discrimination. The person must be
otherwise qualified, or able to meet, the requirements of the program in question.
10). Public law 93-380 (education amendments of 1974)
Ans: P.L.94-142 is the funding portion of this act. It required states to provide full
educational opportunities for children with disabilities. It addressed identification, fair
evaluation, alternative placements, due process procedures, and free, appropriate public
education.
11). Public law 94-142 education for all handicapped children act), 1975
Ans: Provided for a free, appropriate public education for all children with disabilities,
defined special education and related services, and imposed rigid guidelines on the
PaperStoc.com Page 2 of 28
, provisions of those services. It paralleled the provision for a free and appropriate public
education in section 504 of Public Law 94-142 and extended these services to preschool
children with disabilities (ages 3-5) through provisions to preschool incentive grants.
12). Seven fundamental provisions of idea
Ans: 1. Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
2. Notification and procedural rights for parents.
3. Identification and services to all children
4. Necessary related services.
5. Individualized assessments
6. Individualized Education Plans (IEP's)
7. Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)
13). Goss v. lopez, 1975
Ans: This case ruled that the state could not deny a student education without
following due process. While this decision is not based on a special education issue, the
process of school suspension and expulsion is obviously critical in assuring an
appropriate public education to children with disabilities.
14). Public law 95-56 (gifted and talented children's act), 1978
Ans: This case defined the gifted and talented population, and focused upon this
exceptionally category, which was not included in Public Law 94-142
15). *larry p. v. riles, 1979
Ans: This case ordered the reevaluation of black students enrolled in classes for
educable mental retardation (EMR) and enjoined the California State Department of
Education from the use of intelligible tests in subsequent EMR placement decisions.
16). Parents in action on special education (pase) v. hannon, 1980
Ans: Ruled that IQ tests are necessarily biased against ethnic and racial subcultures.
17). Board of education v. rowley, 1982
Ans: Amy Rowley was a deaf elementary school student whose parents rejected their
school district's proposal to provide a tutor and speech therapist services to supplement
their daughter's instruction in the regular classroom. Her parents insisted on an
interpreter even though Amy was making satisfactory social, academic, and educational
PaperStoc.com Page 3 of 28
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Academik001. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $14.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
