Exam (elaborations)

CONTRACTING OFFICER WARRANT BOARD WITH QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS [ACTUAL 100%] GRADED A+

0 purchase

Course
CONTRACTING OFFICER WARRANT

Institution
CONTRACTING OFFICER WARRANT

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 63 pages

View example

Uploaded on March 18, 2024
Number of pages 63
Written in 2023/2024
Type Exam (elaborations)
Contains Questions & answers

contracting officer
contracting
contracting officer warrant board with questions
contracting officer warrant board

Institution CONTRACTING OFFICER WARRANT
Course CONTRACTING OFFICER WARRANT

jackwa Member since 1 year 44 documents sold

$22.99

Add to cart

Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

CONTRACTING OFFICER
WARRANT BOARD WITH
QUESTIONS AND CORRECT
ANSWERS [ACTUAL 100%]
GRADED A+

You are the PCO for a major competitive negotiated source selection. The RFP,
which reflects the user's requirements and is based on the user's budget, has a
requirement for 220 cargo loaders to be delivered at 55 per year over the next
four years. One offeror proposes to deliver all 220 loaders in the first year at a
dramatically reduced price. Can you accept the offeror's proposal? What factors
should you consider in your decision? - ANS---You can accept the offeror's
proposal under certain circumstances. Firstly, what did the RFP say about
alternate proposals? Is this a situation where requirements are changed and the

,other offerors should be allowed to propose on the basis of the changed
requirements? You need to ask the user if he wants all 220 in the first year and
are the operating locations physically able to accommodate their loaders in the
first year. Finally, the offeror could be taken into discussions and asked to
conform to the RFP with there being the possibility of not being selected for
award or elimination from the competitive range if the proposal is not made
compliant with the RFP.
You are the PCO on a new $2B aircraft development program. The program is
in contract negotiations for a Fixed Price Incentive (Firm Target) System
Development and Demonstration contract award to a sole source contractor.
The program director, a fast-burning young colonel, e-mails you that she is very
concerned with the aircraft's ultimate speed at the full specification payload. She
would like the contractor to achieve the faster, desired objective speed rather
than the mandatory threshold speed, and thinks that an objective performance
incentive would be the way to go to achieve her goal. You are asked to go to her
office and discuss the matter and the issues involved in using such an incentive.
What do you tell the colonel? - ANS---There are a number of considerations for
the colonel:
The desired additional speed should provide benefit to the Government in order
to justify the expenditure of funds to achieve it. The colonel should be able to
articulate the justification.
The situation is very amenable to a classic performance incentive that would
allow the contractor to earn profit for achieving the desired speed above and
beyond what the final FPIF profit would be for achieving threshold speed. If the
contractor perceives this can't happen, he will either not sign up to the incentive
or will ignore it from Day One.
The incentive and resulting payment have to be structured so as to be based on
observable, measurable results that would determine how much is earned by
the contractor. Subjectivity is not allowable under current AF policy without HCA
approval.

,We have to be very careful to understand what possible unintended
consequences could be caused by the existence of this feature in the contract.
For example, will the contractor reduce aircraft weight beyond safe limits in
order to help achieve the payment? Also, will the contractor consume excessive
schedule to get the extra speed?
There has to be a cost incentive in place so that the contractor doesn't spend an
unconstrained amount of money to win the payment, such as under a CPFF
contract. The FPIF share line serves this purpose when balanced against the
incentive.
The incentive has to be balanced with the FPIF share line so that the contractor
doesn't spend more money to achieve the desired speed than he has potential
to earn by receiving the payment. Similarly, the contractor can't be allowed to
spend an excessive amount of money with little cost penalty to achieve success.
In some cases, Contracting Officers are also Grants Officers. They can award
Grants and Assistance Instruments as well as contracts. What is Assistance?
How does it differ from Acquisition? What gives the Grants Officers their
authority to enter into assistance? What are the types of Assistance? - ANS---
When the principal purpose is to transfer a thing of value, to carry out a public
purpose of support or stimulation authorized by law of the United States, it is
Assistance.
Acquisition, by contrast, has the principal purpose of acquiring property or
services for the direct benefit or use of the United States Government.
Federal agencies must be authorized by statute to support or stimulate a public
purpose. The statutory authority from Congress must exist either in broad
legislation or in a program-specific statute. Absent that statutory authority, a
Grants Officer may not use an assistance instrument.
Authorities to issue Assistance can be of three types: (1) Provide to the
Secretary of Defense by statute, e.g., 10 U.S.C. 2391; (2) Authority provided to
DoD components that requires no delegation by the Secretary of Defense, e.g.,
10 U.S.C. 2358; (3) Authority coming indirectly from statutes, i.e., federal statute

, authorizing a program that is consistent with using a grant or cooperative
agreement.
Two types of Assistance are Grants and Cooperative Agreements. They differ in
the following way: In a Grant, substantial involvement is not expected between
the agency and the recipient. In Cooperative Agreement, substantial
involvement is expected between the agency and the recipient. Cooperative
Agreements, then, are particularly useful in the research arena when the
Government is interested in being involved in program decisions or may be
doing some testing or research themselves.
You are the Contracting Officer on a new Research and Development program.
Proposals were recently received in response to a Broad Agency
Announcement, and a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type is anticipated. The
proposal most favored by the technical team was priced significantly under what
was estimated for the effort. The contractor proposed fee in an amount that
equates to 20% of the estimated cost. The users have more than enough funds
to cover the proposal and want you to accept the price as is. How should you
advise the user and what factors should you consider in determining a
reasonable fee? - ANS---The statutory limitation on fee for CPFF type contracts
do no permit exceeding 15% of estimated cost for experimental, developmental,
or research performed under a CPFF contract. Since the proposed amount of
fee is outside the statutory limitations you need to determine what a fair and
reasonable rate is that falls within the limitations. The FAR recommends a
structured approach for determining fee such as Weighted Guidelines. If a cost
reasonableness review determines the estimated costs to be acceptable, we
can still negotiate and adjust the fee.
You are the Contracting Officer for a well established transport aircraft program.
The program is nearing the end of production. A Program Manager approaches
you requesting that you issue a Broad Area Announcement (BAA) to support the
development of a source list to supply active noise reducing headsets. The
headsets are commercially available from multiple sources and the PM wants to
receive performance specification sheets from each offeror and then request

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jackwa. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $22.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

69052 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 15 years now

Start selling

Exam (elaborations)

CONTRACTING OFFICER WARRANT BOARD WITH QUESTIONS AND CORRECT ANSWERS [ACTUAL 100%] GRADED A+

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview