100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary European Commission - Tax Reforms in EU Member States $3.25   Add to cart

Summary

Summary European Commission - Tax Reforms in EU Member States

1 review
 29 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary on European Commission (2015). Tax Reforms in EU Member States, Working Paper no. 58, section 4.4

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • December 15, 2018
  • 6
  • 2017/2018
  • Summary

1  review

review-writer-avatar

By: sylvia0101 • 4 year ago

avatar-seller
European Commission (2015). Tax Reforms in EU Member States,
Working Paper no. 58, secton . .
WT – wealth tax(es); taxaton of wealth

. . WEALTH AND INHERITANCE TAXES FROM A REDISTRIBUTIVE PERSPECTIVE

. .1. Introducton

- stocks of wealth  increasingly seen as a potental base for taxaton
- WT – atractie as a way of addressing concerns relatng to distributve justce  Pikety
- EU MS  leiy WT and taxes on transfers of wealth; most commonly: real estate and land taxatonn
then inheritance tax
 Italyn Spainn France and the Netherlands  iarious forms of net wealth taxaton
- reienue-raising potental:
 taxes on the possession or transfer of real estate or land – ca. 3 %;
 inheritance and gif taxes – 0.6 %;
 net wealth taxes – 0.5 % of the tax reienue.
- goiernments – try to steer away from taxes on labour (to foster growth)n thus the asset-based
taxaton becomes a part of the discussion

. .2. Wealth taxaton

- WT – regarded negatiely in recent decades; tendency of rates to be loweredn scope reduced;
arguments:
 WT was not optmal for efficiency reasons
 High leiel of tax avoidance
 Administratve costs of WT
- Yet: now the shif of the debate is more towards the general wider efects of the inequality of
wealth distributon

The arguments:

Diamond and Saez; Jacobs – the reliance on labour taxes at the detriment of capital and WT in economic
theory
- labour and consumpton taxes alone do not seem able to make high-income earners contribute
effectiely (the distintti betweei napital aid labtur iintme bentmes blurred at the ttp tf the
iintme snale, the ntrrelatti betweei eariiig tpptrtuiites aid the prtpeisity tt save is ptsitvee
- tax rates applied to the highest incomes are limited – there is a need to preserie the positie
incentie effects on labour supply and human capital investment; ttp perstial iintme tax rates are
btuid by the CIT rate, whinh ants as a ‘banksttp’, aid whinh, ii turi, is limited by iiteriattial tax
ntmpettti
- wealth is more concentrated compared to incomen and thus net asset taxaton could beneft
borrowing-constrained householdsn and could potentally haie a greater redistributie effect

Also: the practcal feasibility of WT is improving
- internatonal standards on third-party reportng & on informaton exchange relatng to asset
holdings and capital income  the aioidance of capital taxaton is less profitable
- new standardsn falling cost of managing large databases  lower administratve costs of WT

, - exchange of informaton (net wealth countries)  useful way of checking the ialidity of capital
income reportng

Arguments for WT  wealth is a source of utlity independent of income (the saiing of wealth is consistent
with such an interpretaton)
- wealth as ‘insurance’ and consumpton smttther  minimizes the effect of a temporary reducton
in incomen allows indiiiduals to maintain the same lifestyle throughout lifetme
- wealth as conferrer of power  power that results from the command oier resources; proiides an
adiantage in bargaining situatonsn creates disproportonal politcal infuence and encouraging rent-
seeking

For all these reasons: wealth distributon maters

- tax design should thus 1) be eialuated on how it redistributes wealth in additon to income and 2)
wealth should be considered among possible tax bases
- household income and wealth – positvely correlated (not necessarily highly  income thus is not a
good proxy for wealth)
- current income tax systems: do not mitgate growing income inequality (factors playing a role:
limitatons on IT progressiiityn the unequal inital capital endowments)

WT proponents  arguments in faiour of the progressiiity of WT (desirability of a more equal wealth
distributon):
- highly unequal distributon of net assets can be a source of macroeconomic instability

US: household debt  mitgated consumpton inequalityn but resulted in the pre-crisis growth model

Europe: difcultes in adjustng household portolios to income and wealth  important role in depressing
consumpton and growth in the countries most affected by the crisis

- widening asset ownership may encourage entrepreneurial actvity and growth

asset ownership  an important prerequisite for accessing creditworthiness

more equitable distributon of assets  easement of funding constraints for less wealthy  generaton of
entrepreneurial actvity and innovaton  and thus in the long run improiement of general economic
performance

wealth inequality  can haie an effect on external imbalances (the signifcant effect of the saiing behaiiour
of the wealthiest on aggregate saiings and the responsiieness of consumpton to changes in stocks of
wealth)

stockbased progressiiity would allow higher levels of wealth to be taxed more  the income tax system
would then help more accurately to mitgate socioeconomic inequality

. .3. Housing taxaton between efficiency and equity

- consumpton of housing seriices by owner-occupiers  historically more faiourable tax treatment;
outdated property ialuatons used as the tax base further increase this adiantage
- to make tax system neutral  housing taxaton would need to be aligned with the approach taken
to other forms of investment and to savings

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller taxgirl206. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $3.25. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you


$3.25
  • (1)
  Add to cart