MPOETC STUDY GUIDE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, GRADED A+/ VERIFIED.

MPOETC STUDY GUIDE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, GRADED A+/ VERIFIED. Mapp v. Ohio - -federal court exclusionary rule to the states Terry v. Ohio - -Creates stop and frisk Nix v. Williams - -inevitable discovery Katz v. US - -reasonable expectation of privacy Who investigates aliens being smuggled or trafficked or aliens engaged in narcotics trafficking, bulk cash smuggling production of counterfeit ID documentation or nation security and terrorism - - Homeland Security Special Agents Graham v. Connor - -objective reasonableness Brower v. Inyo County - -Seizure occurs when government termination of a person's movement is effected through means intentionally applied. Commonwealth v Edmunds - -No good faith in PA Commonwealth v Speaks - -Inevitable discovery in PA Commonwealth v Greensburg - -Reckless driving Commonwealth v. Mimms - -Allowed to order driver out of a vehicle and pat down for safety Commonwealth v. Brown - -Order passengers out vehicle Commonwealth v Bunch - -can arrest all people for one thing due to close proximity in car - weed US v. Leon - -good faith exception Commonwealth v Mocoliocco - -Ethnic intimidation/possession of instruments of a crime Georgia v. Randolph - -Without a warrant police have no constitutional right to search a house Miranda v. Arizona - -The accused must be notified of their rights before being questioned by the police Commonwealth v Gary - -Warrentless Searches of a Vehicle 1st Amendment (Article 1 Section 11) - -Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition 2nd Amendment (Article 1 Section 21) - -R