100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A LEVEL - EDUCATION - KEY SOCIOLOGISTS $10.48   Add to cart

Class notes

A LEVEL - EDUCATION - KEY SOCIOLOGISTS

 17 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Every single and important references and explanations used for Sociology -Education. Includes every significant link and sociologist relating to every topic within Education. Most include: 1) External Factors - Class Differences In Achievement 2) Internal Factors - Class Differences In Achie...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 25  pages

  • May 6, 2024
  • 25
  • 2022/2023
  • Class notes
  • Mr tim
  • Education
avatar-seller
External Factors - Class Differences In Achievement


Introductory Middle-class (MC) - non manual occupations e.g. doctors/ teachers/ managers and white
Notes collar office workers
Working-class (WC) - manual occupations
- skilled workers e.g. plumbers
- semi skilled workers e.g. lorry drivers
- unskilled/routine workers e.g. cleaners

Explaining Social class backgrounds - influence success
Class Middle class families perform better than working class - ↑age ↑gap
Differences Middle class - better GCSEs, longer full time education, more in university
Private schools (7% educated) - believe better education - take up places for best
universities

Internal and Internal Factors - factors within school and education system e.g. interactions between
External Factors pupils and teachers/inequalities between schools
External Factors - Factors outside education e.g. influence of home/ family background/
wider society

Cultural Cultural deprivation - theory where a person has inferior norms, values, skills and
Deprivation knowledge (primary socialisation). People of the working class experience cultural
deprivation which disadvantages them - gap between classes increases.
- Disadvantaged families - one year behind those that are more privileged by 3yrs old
‘Cultural Equipment’ - language/self-discipline/reasoning skills etc…

Cultural Hubbs-Tait et al - parents use language that challenges children to evaluate
Deprivation: understanding e.g. ‘what do you think?’ ‘are you ready for the next step?’ - improves
Language cognitive performance - Feinstein: educated parents do this more - also found that they
praise more - improves competence
Uneducated parents use simple language that requires minimal response - lower
performance
Bereiter and Engelmann - language in lower class homes - deficient - use gestures/single
words/broken phrases - children don’t learn the necessary language skills - less
achievement

Speech Codes Bernstein - 2 types of speech codes
- Restricted Code - used by working class - limited vocab, short simple sentences
(lack proper grammar) - descriptive not analytical - speaker assumes listener
shares experience
- Elaborated Code - Middle class - wider vocab, complex sentences, varied speech,
speaker does not assume listen shares experiences - more explicit in
communication - clearer
EC - used by teachers/textbooks/exams etc. more accessible for MC
Critics - Bernstein is a cultural deprivation theorists - WC speech is inadequate - he
argues that they are not culturally deprived - school fils to teach the code

Cultural Parent attitude affects child achievement
Deprivation: Douglas - WC parents place less value on education - less ambitious, less
Parents’ encouragement, visited school less, discuss with teachers less - children less
Education motivated/successful
Feinstein - agrees - parents’ own education - most important - parents are advantaged -
can socialise their children better

Parenting Style Educated parents - consistent discipline and higher expectations - more encouragement in
learning

, Less Educated - harsh and inconsistent ‘do as your told’ stops children learning
independence/self-control - problems interacting with teachers / motivation in school

Parent’ Educated P - know what is expected - do more at home e.g. read with child, teach
Educational alphabet, help with homework etc…
Behaviours More advice, better relationships with teachers, better at guiding child - more likely to send
child on trips e.g. museum/library

Use of Income Educated P - spend more on children’s education
Bernstein and Young - MC mothers buy more toys - educational/ require brain -
intellectual development - WC can’t do the same
MC have more money - healthier diets - better in school

Class, Income Better paid MC - better educated vice versa
and Parental Feinstein better educated P have kids who are more successful at school - not all WC
Education children do bad and not all MC children do good

Cultural Subculture - a group whose attitudes and values differ from those of the mainstream
Deprivation: culture
Working Class Sections of WC have different goals, beliefs, attitudes and values - kids fail at school
subculture Sugarman - 4 barriers of WC subcultures that stop educational achievement
- Fatalism: belief in fate - go with the flow - different to MC - they believe in
meritocracy - you can do better
- Collectivism - valuing groups than individual self - MC differ - you should do what
is best for you - ignore attachments
- Immediate Gratification - fun now instead of sacrificing to achieve goal in the
future - MC differ - hard life now great life later
- Present-time Orientation - lack long term goals - present more important - MC
look to the future
He thinks that differences in values come from types of jobs - MC jobs - more secure -
encourages ambition, long term planning, time and effort, individualism - opposite for WC
Theorist argue parents pass on values of class to their children

Compensatory Compensatory education programmes - tackle cultural deprivation - providing extra
Education resources to deprived areas - help in early socialisation
E.g. Operation Head Start - American program - pre-school education in poor areas - give
planned enrichment - develop skills - parenting classes/ home visits by psychologists - own
t.v programme

The Myth of - Keddie - victim blaming explanation - children cannot be deprived of their own
Cultural culture - WC children are only culturally different not deprived
Deprivation? They fail because they are put at a disadvantage by an education system dominated by
middle-class values
Schools should help build on the strengths - challenge teachers - anti working class
prejudice
- Troyna and Williams - problem not child's language - it is schools attitude -
teachers have ‘speech hierarchy’
- Critics say some WC parents do care about their kids education
- Blackstone and Mortimore say parents want to be involved - problem - they work
long/irregular hours - segregated by MC

Material Refers to poverty and lack of material necessities e.g. adequate housing and income - How
Deprivation poverty links to education
- Barely ⅓ of people who have free school meals achieve 5/more GCSEs at C+
- Exclusion and truancy more likely for poorer families ⅓ leave school with no
qualifications

, - 90% of failing school located in deprived areas

Housing Overcrowding in families - harder to study - hard to sleep/homework etc…
Children - can’t develop/explore - overcrowding
Temporary accommodation - moving schools - disruptive education
Condition of house - heating/clean/damp etc… - health problems - absent from school

DIet and Health Howard - young people from poor homes have lower intake of energy/ vitamins/ minerals -
lead to bad health - harder to concentrate/absent because kids are ill
Poorer homes - more emotional and behavioural problems - Wilkinson - lower the social
class the higher the anxiety/ hyperactivity and conduct disorders - all affect education
Blanden and Machin - low income families - more likely to fight/tantrums - disrupts
schooling

Financial Lack of finance - miss school trips/ equipment/ food
Support and Tanner et al - study found costs like transport/ equipment etc… place burdens on poor -
Cost of children are more likely to use hand-me-downs/ cheaper/ unfashionable equipment -
Education isolated/bullied/ stigmatised - children lose self esteem - could be reason for 20% of people
not taking free school meals
Smith & Noble - stops poor from getting into private schools/tuition
Financial support (EMAs) for people 16+ has been removed by coalition government -
2011

Fear of debt University - debt - stops WC from going to university/restricts options -
Callender & Jackson - survey found - more costs than benefits - attitudes to debt helped
decide which uni to apply - WC were 5x less likely to apply than MC
Uni fees - £9000 a year at least - fall in applicants
WC kids in uni receive less financial support from families
The National Union of Students - survey (2010) - 81% MC received financial help
compared to 43% WC
Restricted options - live at home (save travel costs) - less likely to go to high status uni
Uni drop out rates are higher amongst poor

Cultural or Some poor people do succeed - material deprivation is only part of explanation
Material Factors? Other factors could include - cultural/ religious/ political etc… values
Feinstein - educated parents are good for kids even with bad income
Robinson - tackling child poverty is most effective way to boost achievement

Cultural Capital

Bourdieu: Three Argues both cultural and material factors contribute to educational achievement - uses
Types of Capital ‘capital’ to explain why MC are more successful
3 types of capital - educational/cultural/economic

Cultural Capital Refers to knowledge, attitudes, values, language, tastes and abilities of MC - gives
advantage to those who have it - happens through socialisation - kids acquire ability to
analyse/express abstract ideas - more educational interest
Education values the list above so favours MC
WC kids feel segregated - education not for them - act out instead/quit

Educational and Converted into each other
Economic MC kids with cultural capital - better at school - parents pay for education (private
Capital schools/tutors) - converting economic capital to educational capital
MC families more likely to buy houses near schools - school on catchment system takes
their kids in - WC can not enter - house prices too high to live their - Leech and Campos’
study of Coventry

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jamalchowdhury. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79223 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.48
  • (0)
  Add to cart