Exam (elaborations)
reconstructive memory sample essay on 8 marker evaluation
- Course
- Institution
a sample essay on an 8 marker question about evaluation of the working memory model including 2 PEEL paragraphs and 1 conclusion
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
erikakumar
Reviews received
Content preview
2In conclusion, Sebastian and Hernandez-Gil was artificial and not ecologically valid, but
its conclusions can be replicated as they were supported by other studies looking at
different cultures.
● Evaluate the working memory model (8)
One strength of the working memory model (WMM) is that there is experimental
research evidence to support the model. The model proposes that there are 2 slave
systems that make up part of the model. One of the slave systems is known as the
phonological loop which deals with auditory information (spoken and written) and
preserves word order. Thi can be further subdivided into the phonological store that
holds words heard (speech perception) for 1-2 seconds (inner ear) and the articulatory
process which holds words heard/seen and silently repeated (looped) like an inner
voice (speech production). The support for the role of the phonological loop as a slave
system, comes from a study conducted by Baddeley (2003). For example, Baddeley
(2003) tested participants’ recall of similar sounding letters (E,G,P,etc) and found that
they got lower scores than with dissimilar letters (W,X,K,etc). If the phonological loop is
overloaded, that would explain this. This supports the notion of the role of the
phonological loop. This is good as it suggests that the model is credible as it has
scientific research to support the components of the model. However, studies such as
this which support WMM lack ecological validity because they are unrealistic and
artificial. For instance, Baddeley’s lists of similar sounding words are not an ordinary
everyday activity and don’t tell us how memory works in normal situations. This means
that the research which supports the model may be flawed, which may also undermine
the credibility of the model itself.
In conclusion, the WMM is a highly influential model which has developed our
understanding of memory. It has both case study and experimental research to support
it. However, more work is needed to better clarify some of the key components such as
the central executive and the episodic buffer. To develop the model further, more
discussion is required surrounding the role of long term memory which the model
overlooks.
Evaluate the theory of reconstructive memory (8)
A weakness with the original studies into Reconstructive Memory is that they
were not very scientific. For example, Bartlett showed how participants changed The
War of the Ghosts to fit in with their own expectations and understanding, such as
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller erikakumar. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.02. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
81311 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now