,CHAPTER 1
Introduction:
• Double function of crim proc law :
o Regulates procedure
o Operates as ground of justification in substantive law
Formal consequences: Evidence & witnesses can be excl. as admissible
evidence in case
Substantive consequences: owner/ tenant of property not entered with
warrant can issue civil claim against officers/ minister of police etc.)
• Stipulates formal rules
• Protects substantive interests
• SA law partially codified crim proc law is example of codified law
• Roots of SA crim procedure: Roman; Roman-Dutch & English Law
• Constitutional provisions form dominant source of crim procedure
• Definition: Crim Proc regulates duties & powers of crim courts, prosecutional authority &
police, rights of accused/ arrested/ suspected persons, procedural matters &
accommodates rights & interests of victims
Main purposes of crim proc law:
1. Provide process to deliver substantive crim law goals in a manner promoting crim law’s
sentencing objectives
2. Provide a dispute resolution mechanism that distributes power amongst state officials
3. Provide legitimation function in resolving state-citizen disputes
PROCESS OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE NB
Pre-trial (crime/complaint/ arrest/ investigation/ bail)
Trial (hearing; judgement (possibility of discharge)) s v Dewani 2014 art 174 Appeal &
review Not compulsory but usually happens
In practice the above can be disrupted by processes: interdicts, postponements, applications etc.
, 2
2 models of crim proc law: crime control & due process.
• Public perception: constitution seen as pro-criminal(constitution on the criminal’s side) o
Constitution emphasizes rights of accused persons
• Historical context: procedure used as tool by apartheid gov. to enforce racist laws &
deprive people of basic crim process (e.g. detention w/o trial) o Crim proc was abused
to suppress & abuse people
Distinction between adjectival & substantive law:
• Substantive law:
o Legal rules determining individual rights & duties of individuals &
state o Present in private & public law o Substantive crim law:
Requirements for crim liability
Prescribes elements of specific crimes
Attaches consequences to crimes Adjectival law:
o provides measures to enforce rules of substantive law
puts substantive law into action o crim proc rules can’t, don’t & may
not operate w/o common law & constitutional rights (substantive law)
Scope & content of crim proc:
• crim procedure shouldn’t be viewed as a formalistic subject with rules o encompasses
norms, underlying principles, & interests that are protected.
o It can be viewed only as a process.
• Part of the crim justice system o Incl. crim proc, law of evidence, law governing
prisoners & prisons, substantive crim law & law of sentencing
o Common binding factor: deals with crime, its forms & its perpetrators o
Ensures firm & fair rule enforcement of substantive law in society’s interests
Broad & narrow crim procedural law:
• crim proc in the narrow sense:
o Concerned w course of process (pre-trial, trial, post-trial)
, • crim procedure in broad sense o Concerned w extradition, cooperation w international
courts/ tribunals etc.
• Minister of justice v additional magistrate Cape Town 2001.
Tension between Crime Control & Due Process
• NB: aren’t opposing models, most systems conform to combo, with more emphasis on 1.
• Crime control model :
o Packer: Most NB function of crim process: repression of crime
o Packer: power (especially state power) always subject to abuse SA
history has many examples of state power abuse (especially in apartheid) Due
process model :
o Ensures rules followed in accordance with rights of individual at every
stage.
o “Constitution is pro-criminal”?
e.g. Presumption of innocence, right to remain silent
emphasis on rights of accused, SA crim process is seen to be pro-criminal
Do we have unreasonable protection for suspects? Should constitution
be amended to make it easier for the state to prosecute?
• “Detention w/o trial”-Historical context o Crim proc can be abused so guarantees in
constitution shouldn’t be seen as procriminal
• INTERNAL TENSIONS:
o Innocent people are drawn into crim justice system especially during pre-trial
stage o liberty of the innocent shouldn’t be sacrificed to increase efficiency of crime
control
Increases probability of innocent people being convicted
Risk: acquitting guilty in favour of error prevention o If state
were given absolute power, society would be ruled under autocracy
If individual rights were absolute, state wouldn’t have power to
enforce law o Crim proc rules must regulate state power
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gabrielmusyoka940. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.